Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
influence of the media on politics
influence of the media on politics
influence of the media on politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: influence of the media on politics
The “Panama Deception,” directed by Barbara Trent of the Empowerment Project and narrated by actress Elizabeth Montgomery, observes a distinct failure to implement 20th-century democracy in Latin America in the late '80s and early '90s. More specifically, the film documents the U.S. invasion of Panama under "Operation Just Cause” during this period, showing how the cause was anything but just. Rather, the film shows how the Operation intended to impose a biased renegotiation of the aforementioned treaties. Released on July 31, 1992, the two-year film production was meticulously researched, yet laid out simply and forcefully the case against the US government story, and won the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature as a result. Made all the more timely by the recent war on terrorism (or errorism, as I like to call it), the “Panama Deception” shows how the U.S. killed between 3,000 to 4,000 people over the course of an invasion that the rest of the world was against (a theme duplicated in the War on Iraq and others prior to then Panama invasion). Years before the United States went after Saddam Hussein, the White House had General Manuel Noriega, who had been on the CIA’s payroll over the 20 years prior to the invasion, in its sights. Noriega was actually taken off the CIA payroll by President Jimmy Carter's CIA Director Mansfield Turner back in 1978, but immediately put back on the CIA payroll by the Reagan Adminstration at double Mansfield’s salary. Placed at the head of the CIA to do the government’s bidding, Noriega was basically manipulated into becoming a tyrannical arms and drug kingpin. Under the Bush administration, Noreiga’s orders to organize drug trafficking and support the Nicaraguan Sandinista rebels ensured ... ... middle of paper ... ... Cited The Panama Deception. (n.d.). IMDb. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105089/?ref_=ttmd_md_nm The Empowerment Project::The Panama Deception. (n.d.). The Empowerment Project::The Panama Deception. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://www.empowermentproject.org/pages/panama.html Hinson, H. (1992, October 17). ‘The Panama Deception’ (NR). Washington Post. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/thepanamadeceptionnrhinson_a0a7bd.htm Canby, V. (1992, October 23). The Panama Deception (1992) Reviews/Film; Invasion of Panama: Rooting Out the Reason. . Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9E0CE1DA113EF930A15753C1A964958260 Burns, E. B., & Charlip, J. A. (2007). Latin America: an interpretive history (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Manuel Noriega, the former dictator of the Central American country of Panama, rose to power through the art of destruction deception and detail. Manuel Noriega was able to profit and flourish as Panama’s new leader because of the Cold War environment. Due to the Cold War, its geographical positioning, and financial liberties, Noriega was able to manipulate all parties involved while making him very wealthy, powerful, a political asset, and finally a threat to the United States National Security.
“What We Learned from the Bay of Pigs.” Reader’s Digest July 1963: 92-94. Frankel, Max.
6. Lewis M. Simons, Panama’s Rite of Passage and American Trade, National Geographic, November 1999.
In 1979 Jean Kirkpatrick published Dictatorships And Double Standards, an article dealing with U.S. foreign policy under Jimmy Carter, including policy toward the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. Kirkpatrick argues that Carter “abhors only right wing autocrats” ((43) and that he ignores the primary goal in foreign policy which should be U.S. interests. In her world view, the end justifies the means and stability should be sought over any sentimental notions about democracy for, or sovereignty of foreign nations. She argues that Latin America is not fertile for democracy and that, in the long run, supporting right wing dictatorships will lead to a better chance at this goal, to be achieved at a later date. In her Machiavellian prescription for Nicaragua she downplays the horrors of Somoza and misrepresents the character of the Sandinista revolution. The violence that occurred under the Reagan administration in the eighties can be seen as the realization of the Kirkpatrick school of thought and the results were extremely negative for Nicaragua.
Prior to his Chilean President Salvador Allende’s election, who ran on a ticket of socialist economic reforms, the US government spent millions of dollars in Anti-Allende propaganda and attempted to reason with military forces to stage a coup against him, not even caring of the ramifications of the destabilization of Chile and the ripple effect it would have on other Southern Cone countries. Considering the military dictator Augusto Pinochet’s ascension to power being riddled with gross violations of human rights including state sponsored torture against its citizens the connotations were that because the US prioritized its own security over an entire continent, “there is no doubt that Condor's ruthless operations against political opposition advanced the security agenda of the U.S. national security establishment in its war against communism and revolution in Latin America.” (Mcsherry, 41)
Throughout the 1970s and early 80s, Manuel Noriega was an asset to the United States as he worked closely with the Central Intelligence Agency (The Associated Press). As Noriega’s political strength increased in the early 80s, so did the tensions with the Reagan Administration. These increased tensions led to increasing encounters between Noriega’s Panama Defense Forces and American servicemen and civilians stationed in Panama (Phillips). According to the U.S. Army Center of Military History, “there were over 300 incidences of U.S. military personnel and family members' having experienced...
The President gave orders to Miguel Angel Face, the President's confidential advisor, to help General Canales to escape. H...
In Stephen Schlesinger's book Bitter Fruit, the 1954 coup in Guatemala is discussed, with a particular focus on the U.S actants involved, the larger hemispheric implications of the coup, and the use of foreign policy and propaganda to circumvent Latin American nationalism in favor of American corporatism. I argue that The United States fear of communism, conflation of nationalism with communism, and loss of economic supremacy in the Western Hemisphere were the impetus to invade Guatemala under false pretenses. Through the use of propaganda, masterful (and unethical) political manuevering, economic pressure, foreign dictators, and indirect (sometimes more direct) CIA intervention, the U.S was able to oust a democratically elected leader. I,
The United States Central Intelligence Agency armed and trained an anti-Sandinista Guerrilla force based in the neighboring countries of Honduras and Costa Rica called the “Contras.” (Corn) These Contras began a series of terrorist raids in Nicaragua, and the death toll mounted. A large amount of opposition and protests by European powers soon followed. Congress then banned any further US financial or military assistance to the Contras in legislation titled the Boland amendment. (“Iran-Contra Affair”) This is where the deception started. The Reagan administration knew that if their aid to the Contras st...
Noriega at this point was so involved in the operation that as the business became lucrative he purchased a jetliner that was used exclusively to transport drug money earned from trafficking in the U.S. back to panama where it was placed in Panamanian banks. CIA agents slowly learned of all the activity happening in Panama and that General Noriega instead of attacking the drug cartels and traffickers was actually working with them and benefitting from the millions of dollars in bribes (Phillips,
In 1983, Manuel became the military dictator of Panama. In 1984, Noriega committed fraud in Panama’s presidential election. Noriega was still supported by the Reagan campaign, which helped him overthrow the government. In 1988, Noriega was accused of drug-smuggling and money-laundering by juries in Tampa and Miami. The U.S. government disowned Noriega and said they had nothing to do with him. In 1989, the dictator of Panama got rid of a election that would’ve made Guillermo Endara president of Panama. December 17, President Bush gave way to “Operation Just-Cause”, which was a U.S. invasion in attempt to take over Panama. “Operation Just-Cause” was the largest military operation since the end of the Vietnam War. December 20, U.S. forces met with their forces already in Panama. December 24, U.S. crushed Panama’s forces and took control of most Panama. January 3, Noriega was arrested by U.S. Forces. The U.S. invasion of Panama only cost the U.S. 23 soldiers lives and 3 civilians. Even with the little amount of casualties on the U.S. side, it was considered one of the most destructive and violent attacks of the century. It is said that the attack killed more people than 9/11. European Parliament protested the U.S. invasion of
Burns, Bradford E. Latin America: A Concise Interpretive History. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2002.
On September 11, 1973, within a matter of hours, the once proud and historic democracy of Chile gave way to a coup d’état orchestrated by the most senior and trusted leaders of the State's military. As explained by Pamela Constable and Arturo Valenzuela in A Nation of Enemies, “The coup shattered … the myth that Chile's 150 year old civilian constitutional government was invincible”(Constable, p.20).
Why would the Panamanian Defense Force arrest someone who was not only an American citizen but also a Department of Defense dependent; then hold him for nine months in Carcel Modelo, one of Panamas most notorious prisons? Kurt Muse was born in the United States of America but spent most of his life in Panama City, Panama; where he ended up working in the family printing business. Kurt loved Panama and her people very deeply; he could not stand to see what Manuel Noriega was doing to the country. During the summer and fall of 1987 Panama was in a state of disarray, the economy was suffering, protests and strikes were rampant.
Bridging two continents and two oceans, the international crossroads that is Panama has created a massive cultural diversity that has continued to grow for over 500 years. To understand Panamanian culture one has to explore not only its people but also its significant location, and the importance of its canal in fostering business and trade with the countries of the world. The United States has also had a close, stake in the success of Panama for over a century. This partnership continues today and Panama plays a vital part in the success of U.S. interests around the world. Without the canal access and established ties that we share the United States would not be the super power that it is today.