Social scientists and biological scientists have consensus that people are from Africa.
Introduction
The anthropogenic assignment seeks to analyse the debate amongst scientists about modern man. Fossil, genetic, archaeological, geological and palaeontological contributions by various sciences will be stressed. The main reason for stressing these five science branches is their huge contribution in the study of human’s history. Some of the branches will be discussed in relation to anthropology. Scholars’ agreements and disagreements will be examined and, finally, it will be argued that human beings originated in Africa.
The discussion will be in the following order: fossils, genetics, archaeology, geology and palaeontology
Contextual categorisations
…show more content…
Geology fuses different discussed fields and provides knowledge and concepts that are helpful for scientific analyses on the origins of Homo sapiens. For this reason, scientists in archaeology and palaeontology can conduct geological studies that have to do with human origins.
Palaeontology
Palaeontology is arguably the most relevant field on human history and origins. Palaeontology, by fusing archaeology, genetics, anthropology and sometimes minute geological knowledge has made the origins of humans very pertinent by its studies. Through one of the sub-disciplines of palaeontology, palaeoanthropology, anthropology has been incorporated into the study of human origins. This is highly appreciable because fusion of anthropology and palaeontology allows for the social science and previously dominant biological perspectives to contribute on the literature about Homo sapiens.
Fossils cannot be ignored in the study of human origins, realising this fact, palaeontology focuses on fossils. Multidisciplinary nature of palaeontology makes the outcomes of applying tools of analyses from archaeology, anthropology, genetics and many other fields on fossils to be valuable on human
…show more content…
One of the famous remains is named of this world heritage site is known as Mrs Ples () by the scientists due to the realisation that these are female remains of a Homo sapiens’ most South African complete ancestor (Wits, 2015) which is Australopithecus genus
Over the last few hundred years, more and more has been added to the world’s fossil collection, fossils from all over the world. New theories have been created and old theories have almost been proven about the evolution of man. For example, we have proof that different species of man existed with certain types of DNA sequences and instincts, some we may not have anymore, or some that other species did not have back then. Even though it is subjected to much debate, one of the most widely accepted theories however, is that Homo sapiens interbred with the slightly more primitive species of man, the Neanderthal.
middle of paper ... ... Rickman, J. (2001).Earliest Hominid Discovery Not the Missing Link—But Close [online].Energy Science News. Available from: www.pnl.gov/energyscience.com [Accessed 30 March 2004].
Allen, John S., and Susan C. Anton. "Chapter 13 The Emergence, Dispersal, and Bioarchaeology of H. sapiens." Pearson Custom Anthropology. By Craig Stanford. Boston: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2013. 200+. Print.
In 1972, a group of researchers led by Donald Johanson, founding director of the “Institute of Human Origins” of Arizona State University, sets out to discover a hypothesized human ancestor, Lucy, in the Hadar Formation in Ethiopia. Donald Johanson’s group hypothesized the existence of a biped human ancestor, with the great ability to walk upright like humans, which of Lucy having a relatively small cranial capacity like that of an ape. This creature, Donald Johanson hypothesized, would be a “missing link” between the apes and humans, and prove that the populated humans developed the ability to walk upright before developing higher intelligence, which was opposed to the common b...
Australopithecus afarensis who existed 3.5 million years ago and a 4.4 million year old skeleton of an Ardipithecus ramidus are the closest science has come to discovering the human lineage. Shattered Ancestry an article written by Katherine Harmon discusses the remains of two hominids found within Ethiopia. These skeletal remains have created a huge controversy within the topic of evolution questioning many assumptions that have been made referencing the human lineage. The skeleton of the Australopithecus afarensis was named Lucy and was discovered in 1974. The evidence of her walking upright on her two feet essentially guaranteed her a spot in the human lineage line. Lucy was a chimplike ape that was said to walk upright making scientists believe the human ancestry was simple. The complete skeleton found in Ethiopia of an Ardipithecus ramidus named Ardi completely changed all assumptions made from scientists about the complexity of the human lineage. These remains have encouraged researches that the human line is not the only lineage to have evolved but the chimpanzee line has undergone drastic changes as well. There are many traits that researchers have always directly linked to the human lineage however since these discoveries occurred researchers are reconsidering. The recent discoveries that have shattered what has always suggested what linked a species to the human lineage have changed the certainty of whether it is possible to confidently identify the human’s last common ancestor. Majority of scientist had forgotten that there would have been many hominid species living together at one time. New theories have been suggested since scientists revealed that the foot of a hominid found called the Burtele site was found ju...
Trinkaus, E., Milota, S., Rodrigo, R., Mircea, G., and Moldovan, O. (2003). Early modern human cranial remains from the Pesxtera cu Oase, Romania. Journal of Human Evolution 45, 245–253.
Myers, provider of source material for Edie Heydt's notes from "Human Origins," fall 1997, Alfred. Much of the material in the notes is paraphrased, and the original information sources are unknown.
This paper has shown how Homo sapiens had several advantages over the Neanderthals including better diets, better tools and just better luck. The Neanderthals could not survive the harsh climates they were thrust into and eventually died out. In this paper I looked at how Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis had co-existed but the disappearance of the Neanderthal ius due in some part to the appearance of the more culturally advanced and genetically superior Homo sapiens. Although the How and Why of how Neanderthals went extinct, it is clear that Homo sapiens had a part in their demise. In the last one hundred and fifty years that we have been studying humans we have seen them come from savage brutes, to Homo sapiens respectable contemporary. If we had not gotten lucky in the past, Neanderthals could be studying us today.
Paleoanthropology: Pliocene and Pleistocene Human Evolution. Paleobiology, 7:3:298-305. Frayer, David W. and Milford Walpoff 1985 Sexual Dimorphism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 14:429-473 Key, Catherine A. 2000 The Evolution of Human Life History.
The human archaeological record is a long and undefined story that may be the most complex question researched today. One of the big questions in human history is the disappearance of the Neanderthal people from the archaeological record around 30,000 BP. While for thousands of years Neanderthals and Anatomically modern humans crossed paths and perhaps lived in close relations, we have yet to really understand the degree to which they lived together. My hypothesis is that these two hominids, Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans, interbred exchanging genes after Modern Humans dispersed from Africa and creating like cultures and material remains. The differences between Neanderthal and Modern humans are not only physical but also genetically evolved and this research will determine an estimated amount of admixture between the two groups.
The idea that early hominids were powerful players in the ancient is slowly slipping away. Evidence is emerging that our ancestors were not great hunters, but scavengers that roamed the savanna looking for leftovers. Pat Shipman, discusses how it would be possible for early hominids to survive as strangers and how this method of cultivation affected human evolution. Shipman, uses the marks that stone tools, and teeth would make on the bones of prey animals as evidence for her hypothesis. She theorizes that early hominids weren't mighty hunter, but cunning scavengers.
“The scientific study of how humans developed did not begin until the 1800s in Europe. Until that time, people relied on religious explanations of how humans came into existence. Starting in the 1500s a scientific revolution began to sweep Europe. Thinkers started using scientific methods and experiments to try to better understand the world and the creatures living in it. Eventually these methods were turned to the question of human origins” (The Nature Of Human Origins, 1). Earth made it possible for species to change over time because Ancient Earth provides ability to plenty of time.The Homo Sapien a is very complex creature. The species started off very simple by living in caves and surviving with little food and then later evolved into a species that were able to do many more complex things. The first species was Sahelanthropus tchadensis They were one of the most simple humans in that time period and on. They had very small skulls compared to Homo Sapiens today and their motor skills were just the same. We have evolved and changed for the better both mentally and physically. The Evolution of Homo Sapiens started off simple, such as the Neanderthals, and now we are the most advanced species to ever walk the planet so far.
also films that could have been seen for a small price, but if one has the time
Author Yuval Noah Harari has a unique way of reviewing the past fourteen billion years in his monograph Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. His intention for writing this book is mainly to bring up the conversation of the human condition and how it has affected the course of history. In this case, the human condition coincides with the inevitable by-products of human existence. These include life, death, and all the emotional experiences in between. Harari is trying to determine how and why the events that have occurred throughout the lives of Homo Sapiens have molded our social structures, the natural environment we inhabit, and our values and beliefs into what they are today.
The evidence for human evolution begins with the australopithecines. All the australopithecines were bipedal and therefore possible hominines. In details of their teeth, jaws, and brain size, however, they modify enough among themselves to be divided into five species: Australopithecus anamensis, A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. robustus, and A. boisei. Genus Homo are also divided in five different spices: Homo erectus, H. habilis, H. sapiens, and H. sapiens sapiens.