Pablo Ecobar As A Hero In Killing Pablo, By Mark Bowden

1315 Words3 Pages

The public views infamous figures in a variety of ways. Some may love a certain person, while others may hate that individual. In the book Killing Pablo, the author Mark Bowden describes Pablo Escobar as a villain and a hero. Pablo Escobar lives his life as a drug lord in Colombia. He starts out selling cigarettes and cassettes to residents within Colombia, and later on in his life turns to illegal drug trafficking worldwide. Pablo builds an empire; as one of the richest and most powerful men in the world at the height of his reign, which leads to the extensive manhunt for him and his cartel. Pablo Escobar violently terrorizes the streets of Colombia for almost two decades, yet Colombians look upon him as a hero for building schools and helping …show more content…

In the United States, the American government publishes articles daily about the horrendous acts Escobar commits. The American government instructs the media to influence the public's opinion of Escobar, because the government knows they need the support and money from the average American taxpayer to bring down Escobar. “The federal government needed any type of money they could find, as they were using every nickel on the pursuit of Escobar.” (148). The American government needed every single dollar they could obtain to invest in the capturing of Escobar. When Pablo decides to run for president in Colombia, the Americans immediately start to investigate him and his wealth. When they interview Escobar and question his success, he claims he earns his money as the owner of a Colombian taxi company. When the Americans follow one of his taxis throughout the streets of Medellin, they find almost a kilo of cocaine in the trunk. This sparks a reaction from the American press, which results in the government deploying men and resources into Colombia in the effort to find Escobar, as “The hunt for Pablo had consumed years and thousands of lives and many millions of American dollars (123). The American government preventing the smuggling of narcotics across our border is worthy of any sum of money, according to DEA agent Steve Murphy in the television show Narcos. He claims, “The primary goal for the American …show more content…

Colombian citizens experience and live through the good and bad things Pablo does, when Americans only hear about the negative actions Escobar commits. Hearing versus seeing plays a vital role in the difference of perspectives between the Colombians and Americans. In the United States, only hearing about Pablo Escobar leads to confusion among different people as “For what, exactly, isn’t easy to understand without knowing Colombia and his life and times” (15). American civilians not knowing personally know why they hate Escobar reflects poorly on the United States. The media does not inform the general public about all the great and generous things Escobar accomplishes for Colombia, and only publishes the stories of his cartel killing innocent people. From the perspective of Colombians, they only know Escobar as a hero of Colombia as “At his death, Pablo was mourned by thousands. Crowds rioted when his casket was carried into the streets of his home city of Medellin” (15). Colombians create a national mourning day for Escobar after his death, when the Americans celebrate their success in killing him. This represents the difference in opinion of Escobar between the two countries. Pablo made promises and he conqueres them; he said he would end poverty as he provided education and housing to the poorest people inside of Colombia. On the other hand,

More about Pablo Ecobar As A Hero In Killing Pablo, By Mark Bowden

Open Document