700 Words3 Pages
3. Procedures for Classification and Review of Television and Film 3.1 Designation of Reviewer It is an obligation for the President of the board to appoint his delegates for the evaluation committee. The delegates of the board are liable to divulge any prospective dispute of interest with respect to the subject matter assigned to him for its review. No affiliate of the committee is hereby authorized to carry out the duties in inspecting and categorizing when said panel member has an argument in connection with the said film and television show or advertising/commotional matter. 3.2 Committee on First Review 3.2.1 The Committee on First Review should be made up of at least a minimum number of three board associates, one of whom should be elected as Head by the President of the board. 3.2.2 It is strictly prohibited for the First Review Committee to offer special appraisal for a claimant on terms of an awaiting motion picture date/telecast. 3.2.3 A superior number of votes from the Committee must be adjudicated in order to generate the final conclusion. If in case the dominant decision has not been attained, the Board should carry on contemplating until the associates came up for a majority vote. An associate is strictly not allowed to decline. The final conclusion must be deliberated the same day the subject matter has been inspected by the Board. 3.2.4 If at the end of the day the Committee failed to formulate a final conclusion, the President of the Board shall appoint alternative committee to inspect the picture in the nearest possible time. 3.2.5 After the subject matter has been showed, and before the Board deliver its final judgment, the delegates of the creator and/ or contributor permitted by the Philippine Decr... ... middle of paper ... ... himself the petition, or be accommodated by an ad hoc board he may generate, or the Appeals Committee which is authorized by the Philippine Decree 1986. 3.4 Termination of Committee Only after the Board has delivered its final conclusion and conveyed its conclusion to the claimant, a Committee review is considered dismissed. 3.5 Decision An encrypted report of the final conclusion of Board’s Committee on First and Second Review is obligatory, in which the duplicates must be accessible to the claimant in terms of his appeal, and in no reasons for him to be rejected. The conclusions shall be comprised of encrypted statements of the Board’s necessities which must also be encrypted in the Committee Report that should be authenticated by the claimant or his approved delegates. Works Cited


      Open Document