Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consecuences Of North American Colonization
Relationships between american indians and european colonists
The colonization of europeans into north america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consecuences Of North American Colonization
Hakluyt argues in his discourse that the British could work with the Indians to make a thriving empire in the New World. It was certainly possible for each group to help each other: early contact between Indians and Europeans showed curiosity and interest opposed to aggression. This can be seen in the Indian leader Powhatan’s speech to Captain John Smith: Powhatan wanted to “assure [Smith] of our loves, and every yeare our friendly trade shall furnish you with Corne.” Powhatan and the Indians also knew that the English settlers need their aid. There were goods that the colonists could not “get but by our (the Indian’s) labors.” However, the kindness was not always reciprocated: Smith, a reader of Machiavelli’s Art of War as well as governor of the colony, argued that violence was the only thing the natives would respond to. However, the English colonies never went quite to the extent of the Spanish conquistadores and men like De Soto and Coronado. The English did not really have the ability to though: the British government or military did not support colonization directly until the eighteenth century. The English colonists did not have the military might to crush the powerful indian confederacies. Many tribes saw the English as potential allies at first: using firearms, and military assistance the indians used their English allies to defeat their rivals. During the Pequot War the English, Narragansetts, and the Mohegans combined their forces to defeat the Pequots.It initially proved a boon for all; the English had defeated an enemy and the Mohegans and Narragansetts now found themselves as the lead native powers in the region. Comparing the English’s methods to the Spanish is a bit of a misnomer: the native groups each European... ... middle of paper ... ...s the dominate force in Europe and North America. It was thanks to an altered, and at times spontaneous, version of Hakluyt’s plan. . The Catholic threat was driven out of the colonies once France was defeated by the British during key wars in both Europe and America. The Native American’s proved to be useful allies and destructive enemies; their loyalties forever shifting, Hakluyt’s idea for a unified front never materialized. The spread of Protestantism was quickened with the colonization of the new world, but not because of Native American converts. The population growth of the English colonies not only produced lots of new believers, but also workers who helped build the empire. England by 1763 was the premier North American power, thought that would be altered by a revolution a few years later, but for the moment men like Hakluyt and Johnson could rest easy.
To many of the English colonists, any land that was granted to them in a charter by the English Crown was theirs’, with no consideration for the natives that had already owned the land. This belittlement of Indians caused great problems for the English later on, for the natives did not care about what the Crown granted the colonists for it was not theirs’ to grant in the first place. The theory of European superiority over the Native Americans caused for any differences in the way the cultures interacted, as well as amazing social unrest between the two cultures.
...rth American domination, now held the entire continent, with the exceptions of Florida, Mexico, and the Californian coast, which still were the possessions of Spain. England had won the struggle for North American dominance.
In the period between the parts of 17th century and 18th century, in which most of the European countries were so anxious to proceed in their present condition of colonizing states inside the recently discovered Americas. One specific European country that had an mapped out system that unmistakably conveyed many gatherings to a large portion of the parts of eastern drift particularly two sections known as Chesapeake and New England. It is important that there was a scramble and a surge in an offer to vanquish whatever number countries as could reasonably be expected because of the advantages that would bring about the procedure. Accordingly in the late 1700's the two countries that were vanquished by England later signed up to be one country.The distinctions that existed between these two countries really show the principle motivation behind why England chose to colonize
Delving upon the topic of England versus America, Harriot’s elaboration on both are vivid, resulting in equal perspectives on both sides of the pond. Harriot’s constant references to England’s colonization of America and the Algonkians was a large part of the text and as he often did, hinted that while the Algonkians were people of culture, they were terribly naive and “if means of good government be used, that they may in short time be brought to civility and
Although Smith was of the opinion that the Indians could be incorporated into the English community, he rescinded to a persuasive process of integrating them. Actually, Smith pictured the role of the Virginia Indians as slaves since the English possessed superior weaponry and technology to subjugate them. Notwithstanding, Smith maintained a “cordial” relationship with the Indians.
Thomas Pownall was a man of high status who had a huge influence in British politics. With a resume of governing the Province of Massachusetts Bay, to serving in British parliament, one could say that Pownall was a huge advocate of British practices. Although a supporter of the colonies, Pownall confidently spoke of the impossibility of Independence America faced. He was not alone in this idea, and was supported by other people and situations that made his statement a reality. There were examples from 1600-1763 that support Pownall’s implications; however, through great perseverance and help, the colonies were able to support themselves long enough to build a flourishing America.
...e relatively positive relations that characterized early trade relations between European traders and Native Americans quickly deteriorated. Cultural clashes and disputes over land escalated as English towns grew and population pressures intensified colonists' demand for more land.
During the numerous years of colonization, the relationship between the English settlers and the Native Americans of the area was usually the same. Native Americans would initially consider the settlers to be allies, then as time passed, they would be engaged in wars with them in a struggle for control of the land. This process of friendship to enemies seemed to be the basic pattern in the majority of the colonies.
For the Indians of the Ohio Valley, the third major party in the French and Indian War, the British victory was disastrous. Those tribes that had allied themselves with the French had earned the enmity of the victorious English. The Iroquois Confederacy, which had allied themselves with Britain, fared only slightly better. The alliance quickly unraveled and the Confederacy began to crumble from within. The Iroquois continued to contest the English for control of the Ohio Valley for another fifty years; but they were never again in a position to deal with their white rivals on terms of military or political equality.
I believe that, from the perspective of the British, their desire and efforts to control the colonists were reasonable. After winning the war, Britain had two major problems: the country was in debt, and it had to find a way to protect the land it had just won (Murrin et al. 161). In order to protect the settlers from the Indians,
North America in the early eighteenth century was split between the three major imperial powers of the time, Great Britain, France and Spain. This period was a crucial moment in the colonial history of these three powers due to the expanding nature of their colonies, constantly looking to grab more land and resources for the nation at home. However, before the turn of the century, Great Britain had gone from a few colonies on the east coast of the continent, with the smallest amount of land claimed, to owning the largest part of the New World and obtaining almost complete control over North America. This dominance was not caused by the downfall of France or Spain’s colonies, at least not through their own fault. But rather through Britain’s
The Europeans invaded America with every intention of occupying the land, the bountiful natural resources as well as the complete domination of the native people. The Europeans desire for the land created an explosive situation for the native peoples as they witnessed their land and right to freedom being stripped from them. They often found themselves having to choose sides of which to pledge their allegiance to. The Europeans depended upon Indian allies to secure the land and their dominance as well as trade relations with the Indians. The Indians were in competition with one another for European trade causing conflict among the different tribes altering the relationships where friends became enemies and vice versa (Calloway, 2012, p. 163). These relationships often became embittered and broke into bloody brawls where it involved, "Indian warriors fighting on both sides, alongside the European forces as well as against European forces invad...
In the 1580’s the English settlers feared the Native Americans because the land was new and unknown to them. They did not understand the ways of the Native Americans and feared them. From the settler’s perspective they needed to claim and posses land in order to feel safe. Many English settlers had read articles about the Native Americans prior to there journey to the Americas. The French and Spanish had portrayed the Native Americans as “Indians”. Christopher Columbus wrote that the Native Arawak Indians he encountered as “loving people without covetousness”. Others early explorers also wrote...
In this topic, the Jefferson Administration seeks to expand westward, following the “manifest destiny”, with ever growing desire of white Americans for settlement land. Jefferson’s efforts to expand would be hindered by the Native Americans, who sw their available land decreasing steadily, being backed into a corner, and relied on enemies of the U.S. such as Great Britain for support against expansion. William Harrison, governor of the Indiana territory, would be one of the leading figures against the Indian problem, by which natives were offered an ultimatum: assimilate into American society, leaving their customs aside, or migrate farther west of the Mississippi, losing tribal lands either way. This assertive policy was deemed benign on the part of the Americans, as Jefferson saw the Natives as eventually losing the conflict against white settlers. Through the use of immoral tactics, Harrison concluded many treaties that granted treaty rights to many northwestern lands, with the Indians helpless to America’s power,yet the alliance between native tribes and the British would come to make the American expansion not as smooth. The Chesapeake incident, as well as the surge of resentment towards the British would reveal the development of a new British attitude towards Americans. As a result of such animosity, both politically and socially, British colonial
They were having marriages among them. For example, when Pocahontas married John Rolfe, many said it had a political implication to unite more settlers with the Indians to have a better relationship between both groups. As for the Indians, their attitude was always friendly and full of curiosity when they saw the strange and light-skinned creatures from beyond the ocean. The colonists only survived with the help of the Indians when they first settled in Jamestown and Plymouth. In these areas, the Indians showed the colonists how to cultivate crops and gather seafood.