Outline: A Comparison Of Two Cartoons

Comparing too cartoons

Outline

Thesis statement: - Although both cartoons clearly show the problem from different views, but cartoon A is stronger because of the smarter and stronger techniques it uses like irony, labeling and exaggeration.

1) Introduction

A. Problem statement: - People’s sense fear when they feel unsafe in the street or even in them own houses.

B. Definition / size of problem: - Crime is defined as an act or the commission of an act that is forbidden or the omission of a duty that is commanded by a public law and that makes the offender liable to punishment by that law

C. Stake holders / statistics: - The stakeholders to this problem are not only the citizens but the government and in turn the stability of society as we know it. Home invasions jumped from

The look of the lazy dad that could not remember his own son because he didn’t care about him enough is very ironical.

2. Also cartoon B contains a verbal irony (I don’t know where we went wrong with you son) the dads inability to differentiate his son tells us that he was lying is this sentence and he went wrong with him a lot of times.

C. Conclusion sentence:- In comparing the two cartoons, irony is stronger in cartoon B because it clearly shows how badly the son got neglected by his dad to a point that his dad couldn’t differentiate between his son and another prisoner.

3) Topic sentence: - ( second techniques is labeling and it is the usage of few words to reveal the identity of the person or object being labeled )

A. First cartoon:-

1. In cartoon A the cartoonist labeled two signs with (prison) and (cemetery), also the car labeled with (gang life)

2. Such labeling reveals the stupid life of criminals and nothing they achieve by doing it.

B. Second cartoon:-

1. In cartoon B the cartoonist labeled the father (I don’t know where we went wrong with you son)

2. This tells us the lack of interest by some parents and how they blame their sons when they are in