Middle East, and the Western culture have for a long time served as implicit justifications for the European and American Imperial ambitions. In light of this, Said denounced the practice of influential Arabs who contributed to the internalization of Arabic culture ideas by US and British orientalists. Thus, his hypothesis that Western scholarship on Muslim was historically flawed and essentially continues to misrepresent the reality of Muslim people. In lieu to this, Said quotes that, “So far as the United States seems to be concerned, it is only a slight overstatement to say that Muslims and Arabs are essentially seen as either oil suppliers or potential terrorists. Therefore, very few details such as human density, the passion of Arab-Muslim life has entered the awareness of even the people whose profession revolve around reporting of the Arab world.
His discourse uses both artistic as well as academic trains of thought to define different qualities of Middle Eastern cultures as defined from the Western perspective. According to Ghazoul (2004), among other scholars, Edward Said’s observations are reminiscent of attitudes that extolled European imperialism in the days of colonialism. According to Said (1978) the entire concept of ‘orientalism’ is compromised, in the eyes of most Arabic and Asian peoples because it appears to them to be filled with archaic prejudices against Eastern cultures. Moreover, the word ‘orientalism’ is also used to refer to the definitions of Middle Eastern cultures by scholars who hold more pro-Eastern attitudes. Another common complaint is that Western historians and scholars’ definitions of orientalism do not seek to make distinctions between the different tribes and cultures that make up the Middle East (Varisco 2013).
The Aesthetic Movement implied that art is only to exist for the idea of beauty, and that the viewer of the art should not look into the meaning behind the art. Oscar Wilde believed this theory, and he used ideas from the Aesthetic Movement in many of his pieces, including The Picture of Dorian Gray. The Picture of Dorian Gray was an incredibly controversial novel, especially with its added aesthetic ideas. David A. Upchurch emphasizes the impact that the novel had on Victorian society in his article, “The Picture of Dorian Gray: Overview”. Upchurch declares: The novel was immediately controversial because of the ethics of the aesthetic doctrines it seemed to embrace.
The unsightly face of an Arab or Muslim being does “become symbolic of the... ... middle of paper ... ...edly objected to covering the religion of Islam. He brings up how the media and entertainment world represents aggression as the nature of Islam. According to Said the Orient is constructed in relation to the West, as it is a mirror image of what is inferior and aliens “other” to the West. He finds that Muslims and Arabs “are essentially covered, discussed, apprehended, either as oil suppliers or as potential terrorists” (Said, 9). Rather than provide “the human density” of their lives, “a limited series of crude, essentialized caricatures of the Islamic world are presented in such a way as to make that world vulnerable to military aggression” (Said, 26).
It is clear that Lawrence is simply mocking the tone of those who sympathize with Hester Prynne. By criticizing and retaliating against the idea that Hester Prynne is an admirable character, Lawrence succesfully attacks how Hawthorne seeks to portray Prynne, as well as those who cannot see Hester Prynne as a contradictory symbol to pure society. In this case specifically, Lawrence targets the seduced reader who fails to detect Hester’s mortal sin, mainly because it helps him lead into the gravity of her sin itself. Lawrence also warns those of pure society to not “let [Hester] start tickling [them]” (Lawrence). Lawrence issues a direct statement to the reader that Hester Prynne’s characterization is used for the mere purpose of seduction.
In the novel, The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, D.H. Lawrence views Hester Prynne as a dishonorable character. Lawrence focuses most of his written work around Hester’s adulterous sin and accuses her to be evil. The use of the literary techniques of allusion, critical diction, and choppy syntax to prove she is not a praiseworthy character. Lawrence uses a variety of allusions to persuade his audience that Hester Prynne is not a meritorious character. When describing Hester’s adulterous forms of seducing Dimmesdale, he references that the “Deerslayer refused to be seduced by Judith Hutter” (Lawrence 8).
Caravaggio's uses of symbolism in his work helped him create a name for himself. The ability to read his paintings from so many angles, like in the Sick Bacchus, is what has helped keep Caravaggio and his art alive. His ability to incorporate so many aspects into his work through symbolism and indirtectness, in some cases can be noted a s ingenious. Much of Caravaggio’s is a dissection on the meaning and conditions of knowledge. He can be explained as a "phenomenon which his contemporaries feared, admired, and did not understand (Kitson 9)."
Orientalism is the most typical term, which describes the way of western people seeing the rest of the world. It is a way of seeing the world that western people imagine, emphasise, exaggerate, and distorts the differences of the rest and its cultures as compared to that of Europe and the United States of America (the West), while the western people recognised themselves as overwhelming superiority. The West calls the people of the rest of the world Orient, and sees them different individuals from the West. In addition, Orientalism often involves seeing the Eastern culture as exotic, uncivilised, and at the same time it is going backwards. According to Edward Said, Orientalism is a western misinterpretation of the rest of the world, defined
From this example I can say that titles do matter in terms of understanding paintings, especially when it comes to their main idea and the painters’ main messages. The idea that lies withing the title makes us see the painting in a whole new way and find details that we didn’t pay attention to when the title wasn’t known
What he calls ‘The Clash of Civilization’ is a term that describes the Muslim community as a whole and their unattended support of the West’s freedom of speech. Therefore, he claims that through this approach, their hatred towards the West grew, which also partly blames the West for the expansion of the Muslim fundamentalism. His justification implies that the Muslims were skeptical and resentful of the West’s freedom, in spite of this, the Muslims were only conservative and defensive of their own religious traditions. They were concerned about the West’s freedom influencing them and their younger generations. They saw change within their citizenry to be disadvantageous to their own intellectual awareness and