Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
concept of comparative advantage
the example of opportunity cost
the example of opportunity cost
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: concept of comparative advantage
1.a)Because of the issue of scarcity, people must make choices, what determines these choices is the value we place on them and what we have to give up to get them. What we have to give up is called opportunity cost (OC). For example, if I decide to go hiking instead of attending my tutorial class, “attending the class” would be my opportunity cost, and “hiking” what I have evaluated more important in term of benefits and costs. In this instance, the opportunity cost of making a pizza for Monica is 6 coffee: which is the quantity of coffee Monica has to give up to make a pizza, for Rachael the opportunity cost is 4 coffee. To determine absolute and comparative advantages we compare the opportunity costs. Given that Monica and Rachael are using …show more content…
It is possible to be more productive if specialised in something and then cooperate and trade.The higher is the opportunity cost the smaller they pay-off. While Monica has to give up to 6 coffees making a pizza in a hour, Rachel has the lower opportunity cost of 4 coffees. However, in this instance Monica is able to make 2 pizzas in one hour and Rachel to make 4 coffees in the same amount of time. If Rachel specialises in making pizza and Monica in making coffee they would both end up with ½ of a pizza and 6 coffees each. The best choice to get both benefit in the trade would appear to be for Monica to specialise in making pizza while for Rachael to specialise in making coffee so they will be able to get 1 pizza each and 2 coffees …show more content…
We can consider those values as prices of the good. Monica would not receive any benefit paying more than 6 coffee as she can make 1 pizza in 30 minutes and in the same time 6 coffee. Rachael would not pay more than 4 coffee as she can make 1 pizza in 1 hour and in the same time 4 coffees. Therefore, the highest price would be 6 coffee and the lowest price would be 4 coffees.
2)The marginal benefit is the additional benefit caused by each new unit of a good and it does depend on how people make the decision to pay to consume that additional unit, the additional satisfaction they gain. It may varies because of the quantity and in general decreases as consumption increases. However, in the case of water, I can decide to reduce the consumption and for example use water less for activities like having showers or watering the plant in such as that situation the marginal benefit will be smaller but, if I live in a desert area, the marginal benefit will be larger because of its
A cost-benefit analysis is “whenever people decide whether the advantages of a particular action are likely to outweigh its drawbacks” (Benefit-Cost Analysis, n.d.). The analysis estimates the economic value placed upon a
In the example above these are both five packs and the Kraft is $4.59, and the Annie's is $5.39. With 80 cents you can grab another 20 cents and then you have a good bag of chips from the Edgewood Middle School vending machines. Imagine having delicious Kraft Mac n cheese with a good bag of chips. Yeah, that's better than having gross organic Mac n' Cheese without delicious chips. then , if you break down the price to the unit rate, Kraft is 91 cents per box, and Annie's is $1.07. This shows that they is actually quite a big difference for each Mac n cheese. Why would Annie's be more expensive if it doesn't even taste as good. Kraft Mac n' cheese
In the article “Opportunity Cost Consideration”, Stephen Spiller aims at addressing the various issues that are involved in the decision making process of consumers. Spiller argues that buyers need to involve the concept of opportunity cost in their purchasing decisions so that they can manage to meet their unlimited wants using limited resources (Spiller 595). In relation to this, the article focuses on when buyers should embrace opportunity cost, individuals or parties that embrace opportunity cost, opportunity cost that spring into buyers’ minds and consequences involved in the consideration of the opportunity cost. The author accomplishes his goal by conducting several studies. These studies are fall under various categories such as application of multiple mechanisms in assessing opportunity cost consideration, self-reported consideration, thought listings and possibility of purchase. Thus, the author’s findings play a vital role in highlighting consumers’ need to embrace opportunity costs in their purchase decisions.
As a college student, you are required to make decisions all the time. These decisions differ in there level of seriousness and way it can affect you as an individual and how they may affect your academic performance. I came to college as an athlete, and my choice to be a college athlete meant my life would be different from traditional students. The rigor of my sport meant i would have weights every morning, and practice in the afternoons. It meant I would have to miss class to travel for games but that is what I signed up for.
These economic models are immensely useful and help us to understand what is going on in the world economically speaking. These particular economic models are usually shown in graph or diagram form as they are clear representations of data. The production possibilities curve is a model used to understand how the economic problem relates to a nation’s productive capacity. The PPC (Production possibilities curve) enables economists to gather information on what level of production is possible when all resources are being used and what will occur when there is no availability or unemployment of particular resources. This particular model, PPC, is represented by a two dimensional diagram, therefore assuming that resources can be used to produce either product on the model. The PPC can clearly visualize opportunity cost between two products as the model demonstrates that to produce more of one good, e.g. vegemite, whilst using the same amount of resources, economies must produce less of the other good, e.g.
Price discrimination is a significant and influential practice on the market in the modern economic world. It aids in a firm's profit maximization scheme, it allows certain consumers with more scarce resources the opportunity to purchase goods or services that would otherwise be usable, and it aids firms in balancing what is and what is not sold. Price discrimination is an effective means by which a firm can sell a higher quantity of goods, make a higher profit margin on the goods it sells, and builds a broader consumer base due to differing price elasticity of demand for given goods and services. Price discrimination ultimately equalizes price and value for both the consumer and the firm, creating a more ideal situation for both entities in terms of preference and opportunity cost.
From classroom to a cocktail party, having knowledge in today’s economics is definitely an asset when it comes surviving in the world of business. Cocktail Party Economics, by Eveline Adomait, and Richard Maranta undeniably satisfies as an economic training book, helping you understand the concepts of basic economics. The book brings to light many theories and thoughts, which are explained in a certain way that help readers easily, compare and relate them to each other. During the first couple chapters of the book, the main theories presented are scarcity, value, opportunity cost, production, and absolute/comparative advantage. Believe it or not, all of these theories are relatable to Supply and Demand; the two concepts introduced in chapters six and seven.
Marginal Private Benefit (MPB) is the net private value of the product to the consumer for every additional unit consumed. Marginal Private Cost (MPC) is the net private cost of the product for every additional unit produced.
“Marginal analysis involves changing the value(s) of the choice variable(s) by a small amount to see if the objective function can be further increased (in the case of maximization problems) or further decreased (in the case of minimization problems)” (Thomas & Maurice, 2012, pp. 91). Marginal analysis is known as “the central organizing principle of economic theory” for its importance and applicability to many aspects of our daily lives as well as our careers (Thomas & Maurice, 2012, pp. 94). The key concepts of marginal analysis include total benefit, total cost, marginal benefit, marginal cost and net benefit. These concepts all come together to play a significant role in the use of marginal analysis to reach the optimal desired outcome.
There are three components for the coffee industry which is composed of the suppliers or the farmers, the manufactures or the producers and the consumers or the drinkers. All three of these components of the industry are fighting each other to make the most profit and salary, while also spending the least amount of money. This causes problems when the workers are demanding higher wages which will result in higher cost of production and lead to higher coffee costs. On the other side of the equation the consumers want their coffee to cost less and less for them, which is making workers work harder and for less money. All the arguing between these three aspects of the industry eventually results in a price which makes all the aspects of it happy, although each wants more the benefit them.
I do believe, that if done correctly and wisely, we can make trades that benefit both parties equally. But there many be smarter people working in trading that are able to outsmart others. That being said, I think that these people have a tendency to seek their own gain rather than an equally balanced trade. Personally, I believe that although it is possible to have an equal trade where both parties’ needs are met, I think that there are some instances where a party may outsmart the other and it result in an unfair trade of goods and
Job costing involves usage of situations where every job is done cost differently, consumers specifications play a bigger picture in this case. Direct and indirect costs are encountered. It is believed that job costing has lots of costs accrued from the production to the consumers (REEVE, J. M., WARREN, C. S., & DUCHAC, J. E. 2012). This involves labor, running of machines, and all the individuals who are involved in the production of a product from raw to the final product, indirect costs are applied in this order. Job costing order is best showcased in a manufacturing company, let’s take coca cola company, company specialized in beverages manufacturing and distribution, usually customers have no say in the final products of this company, but as the trends for consumption of a certain flavor, according to their statistics they will conform with the demands. The special requirements, like name branding on the bottles of the beverages, customization of the containers have had a significant impact in the consumption of coca cola products (Weygandt, J. J., Kieso, D. E., & Kimmel, P. D. 2010).
The negative externalities of consumption produced here make the marginal social benefits less than the marginal private benefits. The marginal social benefit is equal to the marginal private benefits plus the external benefits. If the plastic bags are over-consumed, then for some of those goods, the overall cost to society is greater than the benefit received. The graph below shows the effect of a negative externality of consumption.
The diagram shows the income and substitution effect of a consumer for good 1 and good 2, that is the substitution effect for bananas and mangoes .Initially, the consumer is faced with a situation where they choose to consume a combination of both goods 1 and 2, forming a point of equilibrium at point A. at this point, the old budget line of the consumer is tangent to the indifference curve that is located at the outer side (the higher indifference curve). Here, the consumer makes a choice of the amount of good 1 and the amount of good 2 to consume so as to attain the highest level of utility. In this case, the consumer makes a choice to consume 11 units of the good 1 and 8 units of the good 2, forming the equilibrium level at point A. A price change occurs for the good 1,say the price changes from 50 to 70. This is a price increase of 20. following the increase in the price for bananas, good 1, the good becomes more expensive. This brings about a change in the consumption of good 1 by the consumer. Thus the consumption level of the consumer moves along to the point E. this becomes the new equilibrium level following the price increase of 20. At the point E, the new budget line of the consumer is tangent to the indifference curve that is on the lower side in the diagram. The increase of the price of bananas leads to a decline in the amount that is consumed. Hence, the consumption level falls from 11 units to 4 units. On
...ises. Therefore, In the case of competing with another student on the market of ice-cream, it is clear that the price of ice-cream on our campus will falls from 1.50 to the new price and the quantity of ice-cream available will rises while the level of demand will stay unchanged.