Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender bias in everyday life
Debate on abortion pros and cons
Debate on abortion pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender bias in everyday life
Opinion on Abortion
My own opinion of abortion is very varied. There are so many different
reasons for abortions. Every woman who has had one will have had
reasons. I am sure they wouldn't have decided in a few minutes that
they were going to abort their baby. They would have thought long and
hard about what to do. I put myself in the position of someone else.
If I got pregnant now would I really be able to keep it. I would, for
one, have to stop school and miss out on the education I would need to
bring up a child. I probably wouldn't be able to cope with the
emotional pressures and cope with the pain of giving birth. It all
seems so easy before you see it through someone else's eyes. Women
don't just have an abortion as an urge of the moment thing.Abortion is
the termination of a pregnancy, known as 'murdering' of the foetus.
There are many theories of the foetus being starved of oxygen, or the
womb being filled with a toxic gas, crushed up, and extracted from the
womb. This is all very well, but remember this foetus will be less
than twenty-four weeks old and is not able to feel pain anyway. If the
foetus was brought into the world unwanted, unloved and entering into
a life of torture, is this not where the pain comes in? Is it not
better that the child had passed away painlessly as an embryo in the
mother's womb, rather than having a life of torture? Of course, not
all abortions take place due to the welfare of the child's life when
it leaves the mother's womb. I do not agree with the pregnancy being
terminated because of the sex of the child. I do not see that as being
a valid reason.
About Abortions:
In the UK, the 1...
... middle of paper ...
...s to abortion argue
that the rights of the unborn child override those of the mother. I
think that the woman should be allowed to make her own choice, as it
her body and it is her life that will be affected by the birth of the
child.
Conclusion:
In conclusion I consider the dilemma of abortion is not one that can
be overcome quickly. Each case is different; each woman has different
needs, hopes and dreams. Who are we to judge one of the hardest
decisions of her life? And who are we to say if it is right or wrong?
, but we can express our opinions towards it. I believe that abortions
should be available but that a woman should have a valid reason for
aborting the baby. I don't think a woman should be able to walk into a
clinic and have an abortion but they should need the consent of 2
doctors as they do now.
Abortion is one of the most hotly contested social issue’s in American politics. It has been used as a political tool by the Republicans (conservative Right) to mobilize its opponents as a strong voting block within the party. On the other side, the Democrats (liberal Left) has use their pro-choice stance over the issue to mobilize women voters, along with other proponents who believe that abortion should be a viable option for pregnant women. It is in this context in which the political debate of abortion is framed in American politics. It is a highly polarized issue; in this paper, we will review articles from both the New York Times (NYT) and the Washington Post (WP) to see how these viable news organizations report on this very sensitive issue.
There are several different perspectives on weather abortion is right or wrong. It often becomes a controversy. One way of arguing it is with Kerby Anderson’s “A Biblical View of Abortion.” Another is with Richard J. Hardy’s “The Right to Choose.” And lastly is Rachel’s, an anonymous writer from msngroups.com, “Abortion the Murder of Innocence.” Each of theses controversial articles are to objectively present different view or perspectives of abortion.
What if someone killed a mere baby, a person who hasn’t had a chance to truly live? What if a stranger, a complete outsider who is just flexing their “power muscles” decided to make pregnancies illegal? In these extenuating circumstances the Government oversteps their boundaries by determining whether or not a medical operation can occur. In the case of Roe v. Wade, these boundaries were overstepped, but it needs to be determined, whether or not to keep the ruling that allows abortions. The Roe v. Wade decision should be upheld because abortion saves women’s lives, it would violate women’s lives to outlaw abortion, and it also decreases the amount of dangerous “back alley” abortions.
Abortion, defined as the intentional termination of a pregnancy, is one of the most highly debated liberties of all time. Approximately one to three million abortions are performed each year. Women receive abortions for reasons such as rape, teen pregnancy, and health concerns. Unfortunately, it is a liberty that some still wish to eradicate due to religious beliefs and misconceptions. Abortion should remain a legal option for women because illegal abortions result in far more fatalities, religion does not serve as grounds for a law, and most importantly, there is no conclusive evidence that a fetus is equal to a human being.
Abortion is a very controversial word. It is not something to be taken lightly whether you are against it or for it. When I say for it, I mean pro choice. Pro-choice to me means being able to decide what I want to do with my body, I am not for abortion. Of course I would rather see a fetus come to life but that is not choice. Whichever your feelings are, there are reasons why the new Texas laws hurt women and could be a gateway to more of our rights being taken away.
For many years, the morality of abortion has been questioned by two perspectives: pro-choice and pro-life. While modern culture explains that abortion is a woman’s free choice if she does not want the unborn baby, the Catholic Church teaches the world that from the moment of conception there is a child with a soul within the womb, and to abort it would be to murder an innocent being.
Even if having a baby is a danger to the body of the mother, abortion is not an option. After the viability point abortion is illegal. The viability point is the baby’s ability to survive outside of the
Abortion has been a perplexing and controversial debate throughout time. There are many articles and philosophers who state their strong polarized opinions on whether it is ethical to have an abortion. Some people believe that abortion is morally unacceptable and under no circumstances will it ever be acceptable. On the contrary, other people believe that a woman should have the right to choose whether she wants to continue with the pregnancy, especially under certain conditions. In “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Jarvis Thomson uses real-life analogies to illustrate her key argument that, even assuming a fetus is considered a person from the moment of conception, the mother and the fetus have an equal right to life. Thomson believes that the human fetus doesn’t have the right to occupy a woman’s body for survival, if it against her will. Thomson argues that, even if we grant that the fetus has the right to life, abortion would still be morally permissible in cases of rape, dangerous pregnancy or contraceptive failure. In this essay, I will argue that even if the fetus has the right to life, abortion, is still morally acceptable in the case of ectopic pregnancy, rape and contraceptive failure, as the fetus doesn’t have the right to use a woman’s body without her consent or if it endangers her.
Perhaps the most heated ethical debate of the twenty first century is the debate around abortion. Abortion is a medical or surgical procedure to end a pregnancy. Abortions are currently legal in the United States, although the laws differ from state to state. Abortions have a long history in the United States, and have been being performed here almost since the colonial settlers first arrived from England. For almost a hundred years, beginning in 1880, Abortions were made illegal almost nationwide. During this time, many women performed illegal self abortions that were often dangerous to their health. Many women were hurt or died from these self abortions, and those who sought out a different path suffered from the lack of proper medical care at small clinics. The prohibition of abortion caused nationwide protests, with protesters calling abortion a right a woman should have. By 1970, almost a third of states had reformed or repealed their abortion laws. Finally, in 1973, the Supreme Court struck down all existing laws prohibiting abortion in the Roe V. Wade court case.
Abortion alone has always been a major issue. Whether it’s the woman having to decide to get an abortion, or anti-abortion groups who are against abortions, trying to make them illegal all over the United States. Deciding on legalizing abortion in the United States seems to be an even bigger issue. For years people haven’t been able to come to a conclusion, legalizing or illegalizing it for good. Abortion which means the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus. Legalizing abortion has always been a big controversy. Deciding whether or not it’s up to the mother if she decides to terminate her pregnancy. For the sake of society’s future, it is important to dwell on the question: Who gets to decided if abortion should be legal in the United States?
Abortion Abortion is an ongoing controversy that affects millions of Americans every year. Abortion is the removal of an embryo or fetus from the uterus in order to end a pregnancy (Dictonary.com) -. The law provides and protects the mother's decision. and consent for medical professionals to perform these procedures. There are several factors that are considered in debating whether abortion is morally permissible or wrong.
In a pluralistic culture of unwanted pregnancy, there exists a contradiction between a relative sense of morality and the democratic ideal of free choice. Aristotle provided the first written record of this irresolvable contradiction in his book Politics, saying, "When couples have children in excess, let abortion be procured before sense and life have begun; what may or may not be lawfully done in these cases depends on the question of life and sensation." (1) The controversy has always consisted of two sides: "Pro-Lifers", who believe that abortion is morally wrong and should not be allowed, and "Pro-Choicers", who support the woman's right to choose the outcome of her pregnancy in all cases. There is also a large group of people who fall somewhere in between, believing that abortion should only be allowed under certain circumstances. To this day, abortion continues to be a topic of dispute, with each side offering many of the same arguments that have been offered for several millennia. Those concerned with the issue saw this played out most recently in the presidential election, a very close race in which abortion was a key factor in many citizens' votes.
One of the most controversial issues in this day and age is the stance people take on abortion. The two main positions that people take are either of pro-choice or pro-life; both sides, although polar opposites, tend to refer to both the issue of morality and logical rationale. The pro-life side of the debate believes that abortion is an utterly immoral practice that should be abolished. On the contrary, abortion should remain a legal procedure because it is a reproductive right; its eradication would not only take away the pregnant person’s autonomy, but would also put more children in financially unstable homes and the adoption system, and would cause an increase in potentially fatal, unsafe abortions.
The deliberate termination of a human pregnancy is called an abortion. Abortions are a widely debated subject throughout the world. In the United States, abortions are legal due to the Roe v. Wade law. Some would argue that abortions are ethnically and morally wrong, while others assert it is simply a woman’s choice. There are a number of legitimate reasons why a woman would choose to abort her unborn; financial status, age and health are just a few. With today’s technology and a certified doctor, this procedure is harmless to both the mother and her fetus. Abortions are viewed by many as dangerous and immoral acts of humanity against an unborn fetus. But in reality, abortions terminate a pregnancy that could result in a child being born into a family with inadequate finances, irresponsible parenting, and possible health problems. For these reasons, abortions offer a perfectly viable solution in situations that would otherwise result in children being raised under circumstances that are at best, not ideal, and at worst, harmful and potentially dangerous.
Abortion by definition means the way of ending pregnancy by removing fetus from the womb before it is able to survive independently. Abortion is an extremely debatable issue because while some people are completely against it, others believe that a woman should have the right to choose. Abortion decision is like killing own child or killing an innocent human life before coming out from uterus. I will explain how a human life is being destroyed, the process in which they destroy the fetus, and how to avoid this situation all together I believe that abortion is morally impermissible.