“There were once two little girls who saw, or believed they saw, a thing in a forest” (Byatt 324). So opens A.S. Byatt's short story, “The Thing in the Forest”; a dark little tale about two young girls named Penny and Primrose, and their experience during the Blitz in World War II (Byatt 325). They, along with many other children, get shipped off to the English countryside to be spared from the threat of bombs from Germany. After a long train ride and a sickening bus ride, they arrive at their destination. It is a very large house, large enough to be considered a mansion, with a stone terrace and lawn behind it. Beyond the lawn is a classic dark English wood, which the two girls decide to go into and explore. They are not used to seeing the natural flora and fauna of the forest as they both have only lived in urban environments. Then they both begin to hear horrific noises, and at the same time begin to smell a smell best described as the “liquid smell of putrefaction” (Byatt 328). The noises and smells continued to get stronger and more intense until the source of both made its appearance to the girls. It is the Thing mentioned in the title; a horrid, miserable creature appearing to be made of all sorts of foulness glued together in a way which makes it appear to be “like still-wet Papier-mâché, or the carapace of stones and straws and twigs worn by caddis-flies underwater” (Byatt 329). The creature makes slow progress past them as they lay behind an old log, cowering in fear. Once the creature has past they stand up and walk out of the forest, hand in hand. After returning to the house they never speak to each other again and are sent to different families. They never see each other again until they are both middle-...
... middle of paper ...
...o some of the most disgusting substances on the face of the earth. Byatt actually forces the Thing into a very awkward position in the story by making it representative of both life and death at the same time. It is very easy to see that Byatt is truly an expert at using symbols and elaborate imagery to bring her tales to life.
Works Cited
Margaronis, Maria. "Where the Wild Things Are."Nation. 14 Jun 2004: 24-8. Print.
Messud, Claire. "The Beast in the Jungle." New York Times 9 May 2004: 233 pp.. Print.
Sorensen, Sue. "Death in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt" Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 43.2 (2002). 27 Mar. 2011.
Villanueva, Maria Casado. "Terrible Absences, Horrible Presences: Phantasmagorias of Childhood in the British Modernist and Postmodernist Short Story." Fear Withing Melting Boundaries. (2011): 21-28. Print.
When the author was describing the petrifying appearance of the creature, she made sure to use words that would make us sick to our stomachs in order to get a really good idea across about how simply disgusting this now-animate creature was. She does this by explaining to us how the creature’s “yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath”. The thought of seeing something so sickening even makes us make a wry face and try to get the image out of our heads – and that’s exactly the reaction the author is hoping to see from us. This also helps us know how Mr.
An image of a dead skull indicates that a substance is poisonous because it happens to be a symbol. Throughout our lives, symbols are used to interpret meanings in an easier way. Similar to how trees represent life and death. They are a constant source of renewal. In Laurie Halse Anderson’s novel Speak, Laurie uses the power of symbolism to expound Melinda’s progress and growth throughout her bildungsroman story by using Melinda’s art class’ project: trees.
In Mary Oliver’s poem “The Black Snake,” the narrator contemplates the cycle of life with the unpredictability of death. Mary Oliver’s work is “known for its natural themes and a continual affirmation of nature as a place of mystery and spirituality that holds the power to teach humans how to value one’s life and one’s place” (Riley). In the poem, The Black Snake, the narrator witnesses a black snake hit by a truck and killed on a road one morning. Feeling sympathy for the snake, the narrator stops, and removes the dead snake from the road. Noting the snake’s beauty, the narrator carries it from the road to some nearby bushes. Continuing to drive, the narrator reflects on how the abruptness of death ultimately revealed how the snake lived his life.
Byatt starts off by telling the reader that the girl, Primrose and Penny, were evacuees from the air raids on Britain and that they were by themselves. This allows the readers to start getting the feel for the scared children. Upon arriving at the mansion the two girls made a pact to stay together, “It’s like were orphans, she said to Penny. But we’re not. Penny said, If we manage to stay together….” (Byatt 353). Once allowed to go, the girls went out to wonder the forest, showing their independence and pushing away Alys in the process. The Thing appears scarring Primrose and Penny, then Byatt pushes to the girls’ departure. Once the girls came back the when on a tour seeing each other. Showing that they still are not orphans because they still have each other. This can also be shown when we figure out each girl is still single. They decide to go looking for the Thing but have no luck. Primrose gets caught up in the magic of the forest and tries to figure out what Penny meant by the Thing being more real than themselves. What can be concluded from her thoughts were that she has a connection to the forest and she wants to regain what she lost. Penny finds the “den” of the Thing and finds reminds of its victims. She tries to confront the Thing but she concluded nothing else was there for her and that it was their way of
Since the beginning of the society, the forest has been portrayed as a place filled with darkness, and inhabited by the devil and other unworldly creatures. The rumors that were formed about what could be lurking in the forest were created to fill the void of knowledge of what was in the woods and to give them something to believe in. In reality, what lurked in the forest was still unknown to most people. The mystery of the forest was what people were so scared of.
The audience is directed to react positively to the protagonist through the use of costume colour choice. The protagonist is wearing white pyjamas underneath a yellow rain coat; white is the symbol of purity and innocence while yellow represents warmth and happiness. During the tension scene, an axe is used as a symbolistic prop. The axe, when used in a barn house, represents the seriousness of farm life, where animals are commodities and not family pets. The placement of the axe in the shadows emphasises it use as tool for death. As the axe is lifted from the wall the blade glints in the light, which does two things: it draws the viewers’ attention to the ominous object, adding to the tension, whilst warning viewers of the blades sharpness and reminding us of its use. Lastly the axe is used to propel the protagonist into action and become a voice for the pig, a voice for mercy and
The tile of the novel refers to a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, who creates a being, using dead human body parts. This creature that he creates causes utter havoc, misery and pain. It’s an extremely thrilling novel, and even Mary was quite surprised she created such a terrifying novel at the time:
Early in the story, the reader is told of Winston 's death. This occurs again in the book using symbolism. Winston’s obsession with the past and trust in a stranger are what leads to his immanent death. The song itself is not the memory of an old man, but more of a morbid warning to Winston. The picture which brings up the rhyme hangs on the wall in the room owned by Mr. Charrington. It is here that Winston and Julia have their secret rendezvous. Likewise, the paperweight is not a simple piece of coral enrobed with glass; it serves as a link to the past for Winston. This item, as well, is also linked to Mr. Charrington.
The moon gleams luminously down on the clearing, revealing a small village that appears to be whittled out of the jungle. On the outermost edge of a cluster of small buildings there sits a hut, all of its windows lit by firelight. All of a sudden a fierce squalling cry pierces the quiet night. The mother lying inside the hut breathes out a sigh of relief as she wipes her sweaty brow. After all these months, her baby has finally made his way into the world. She reaches out and grabs a hold of her newborn son, bringing him up to her so she can see his tiny face. As she looks down on him, a whimper of dismay escapes her. It’s a monster! Surely this horrifying creature cannot be her baby! His face seems to be split from the lower lip up; he looks like he is snarling at her. As she watches, he utters another loud cry. The ghastly tissue where his cherubic mouth should be flaps wildly. Her heart sinks in grief as she realizes that all her pain has been for naught. This monster cannot be allowed to live. They will have to dispose of him.
...hy, disgusting insects. If the villagers knew what the small, disaster-riddled pests were capable of doing, then they would fear the swarm’s return instead of praising and rejoicing it.
The narrator fantasizes death. “So I take phosphates . . . forbidden to ‘work’ until I am well again” (pg. 1). The narrator is taken away from her
Fundamentally, Victor abandons the newborn creature, leaving the helpless orphan to suffer the society’s rejection. Passionate in his benign desire of discovery, Victor outlines his invention of a life from corpses: “As the minuteness of the parts formed a great hindrance to my speed, I resolved … to make the being of a gigantic stature” (Shelley 32). To quickly achieve his goal, he simplifies his work to avoid small parts by building immense features, yet he ignores how the deformities fit in their society. To him, this life is just a lab product and not a sensitive soul. However, Victor recalls his astonishment at the figure’s ugly birth: “Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room” (Shelley 35). Clearly, this gruesome aftermath catches Victor off guard. Unlike natural parents who take care of their infants, Victor deserts his scary-looking creature wi...
Lawrence uses figurative language in order to present his ideas of societies expectations of a man. Lawrence changes the structure and style of “Snake” in order to highlight the struggles of the narrator. Specifically, when writing about the snake he uses repetitive and flowing words. He also uses traditional devices like alliteration, for example “and flickered his two-forked tongue from his lips.” The use of these technics gives the snake an almost human like feel that the reader can connect to. At the same time, Lawrence writes about the log used to hurt the snake in a different style creating such a contrast between the snake’s description and the log. The words describing the log are much different, “and threw it at the water trough with a clatter.” The changing styles helps emphasize the internal struggle the narrator is experiencing as he tries to figure out if he should do as society dictates and kill the snake like a man or do as he wishes and leave the snake in peace as his guest at the water
The story describes the house as being old and tended by an old man. The house is barely described other than it just being dark (paragraph 4). This adds to the creepy
As the bushes and brush grew more solid I began to ponder. Will I make it through this forest tonight or will I be taken in by the thick of the mystery? Sounds from sluggish foot steps caused a vibration around me that lead me to stop in my place and listen closely. Could this forest be haunted or was I just over exaggerating? I started to get very nervous by this time. “It will be just fine,” I told myself. I am just imagining things. I continued my journey through the forest but negative thoughts were running through my l...