On The Waterfront, by Elia Kazan

790 Words2 Pages

For a near-championship boxer to fall from the limelight after a defeat is fairly common, but to lose due to his own brother betting against him is unheard of. Elia Kazan’s On the Waterfront portrays the role of this former fighter living his life as a bum under a local mob boss. This movie stands out from how movies are portrayed today. It didn’t have a lot of fast chase scenes, immense battles, or over-the-top special effects. This movie focused on its characters, by portraying their reactions to the cumbersome niche they play on the dockyard. It was driven by a series of intertwined conflicts, and a strong mix of character development and storytelling, and made for a phenomenal piece of art.

Conflict is what viewers watch movies for, and a well-developed series of conflicts all wrapped up into a single film is a recipe for success. Kazan’s portrayal of Terry Malone, the former boxer who lost his fame due to a betting operation, shows many sides of one’s life when controlled by oppressors. His primary conflicts include his inner turmoil over the death of a fellow dockworker, the constant hammering of grief in the form of Joey’s sister Edie, and the ever vigilant preaching of Father Berry. At the start of the film, Terry is asked to send Joey Doyle, a fellow dockworker, up to his rooftop to have a talk with some mobsters. Unbeknownst to Terry, Joey is killed and the blame for the crime goes to no one. Terry is burdened with the knowledge that he evoked the death of Joey Doyle, and throughout the film is plagued with reminders of his death. He is given Joey’s coat in memory of him, and helps the viewer sympathize with the downtrodden protagonist. Edie Doyle is simply a young woman hoping to find the man responsible for her brot...

... middle of paper ...

...ther’s death, was muffled completely by horns from ships and barges. I believe this took away from the scene, as dialogue helped fuel the story thus far, and such a critical scene being masked to show “pure emotion” overdramatized it to me.

In Conclusion, Elia Kazan’s portrayal of a young savior attempting to bring justice to those that oppress and give a better life to those around him was done superbly. From a series of complex conflicts that broadened to much more than a mere death, to the sheer feelings he evokes through the use of characters and plot; Kazan created a critically acclaimed piece of art that tells a dark tale of one rising against a monopoly for the sake of those around him. This film shows his artistic prowess, and helps inspire new film makers daily: creating storytellers that can spin tales that hypnotize audiences for generations to come.

Open Document