preview

Oklahoma City Bombing

analytical Essay
1861 words
1861 words
bookmark

Acts of terrorism are carried out due to ideologies that are followed by terrorists. These ideologies do not cease to exist with the apprehension of any particular terrorist that commits one act of terrorism. A clear example to point out is the death of Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and their beliefs have continued full force despite the apprehension and execution of one of their top leaders. Their beliefs in their ideology will continued to fuel motives for potential acts of terrorism in the future. By understanding the motives of terrorists, societies can take precautions and measures to protect them from future acts of terrorism. “It's the human intelligence that is the answer and not the physical” that will allow us to fight back again terrorists states Wood, an international studies expert (Dahl & Thomas, 1995).
Countries will never be completely protected from all acts of terrorism. Consequently, it is up to each society to ensure that all available resources are expended to safeguard their country and its citizens. This case study researches the Oklahoma City bombing of 1995. In hopes of understanding this act of terrorism the following topics are explored; the history of the terrorist act and organization portrayed in the act, logistics of the event, effect of the act, and the reaction of the intended target.
History
In April 19, 1995 an explosion occurred at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. The explosion killed 168 people and additionally injured over 800 more; the victims included men, women, and children. Timothy McVeigh committed the majority of this atrocious act, his accomplices Terry Nichols and Michael Fortier, assisted in the planning of the act. Nichols received a sentence of 161 consecutive coun...

... middle of paper ...

...ernment have a prolonging effect to the nation.
Conclusion

References
Dahl, D. & Thomas J. (1995). Terrorism Has Already Left Its Mark on American Institutions. St. Petersburg Times (Florida).
Evans, M. (2013). The Times. A “Lone Wolf” Attacker is Investigators’ Best Guess.
Historical Crime Case Study #2: The Oklahoma City Bombing. Retrieved from: http://resource.rockyview.ab.ca/t4t/forensicscience35-3cr/Module3/L4/M3L4P03-CaseStudyOklahoma.html
Linenthal, Edward. (2001). The Unfinished Bombing: Oklahoma City in American Memory. Oxford University Press.
Solomon, J. (2013). FBI Linked McVeigh to Group After Bombing. Associated Press Writer. Retrieved from: http://www.ourmidland.com/import/fbi-linked-mcveigh-to-group-after-bombing/article_22536953-36df-55b1-a7c9-9ad4abc0dee5.html
White, J. (2014). Terrorism and Homeland Security. California: Thomason-Wadsworth.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that acts of terrorism are carried out due to ideologies that are followed by terrorists. osama bin laden, al qaeda, and their beliefs continue to fuel motives for potential acts.
  • Opines that countries will never be completely protected from all acts of terrorism; it is up to each society to ensure that all available resources are expended to safeguard their country and its citizens.
  • Explains that timothy mcveigh committed the majority of this atrocious act, his accomplices terry nichols and michael fortier, assisted in the planning of the act.
  • Explains that the first assumption was that mcveigh perform a random radical crime against the federal building. the associated press gathered evidence that suggests he had contact with elohim city and members were familiar with his plan.
  • Explains that mcveigh carried out the majority of this terrorist act, but was tied to an organization with anti-government ideologies. the bombing of oklahoma city took place on the same day april 19 years after the waco siege.
  • Explains that the waco siege was a 51-day standoff between federal bureau of investigations (fbi) agents and branch davidians.
  • Concludes that mcveigh acted as a lone wolf on behalf of the ara and its ideology.
  • Analyzes how mcveigh funded the explosives used in the oklahoma bombing. he also gave money from a bank robbery to his sister and asked her to launder it.
  • Explains that the oklahoma city bombing was made as a time-delayed explosive to allow mcveigh to detonate the bomb.
  • Analyzes how mcveigh and his accomplice, nichols, parked their getaway car a few blocks from the building they planned to bomb. they took two days to mix the chemical elements and packed the truck with the created explosive.
  • Analyzes how mcveigh planned to damage the alfred p. murrah federal building. the waco siege resulted in the death of 21 children.
  • Explains that mcveigh was stopped by a patrol officer due to the absence of 'license plate' on the getaway car. the concealed handgun acted as the secondary method to detonate the bomb if the fuse failed.
  • Analyzes the impact of the oklahoma city bombing on the lives of 168 people, including 19 children, and the injuries caused by glass shards.
  • Analyzes how mcveigh planned to bomb a federal building composed of various organizations to honor the deaths from the waco siege, which occurred two years prior to the bombing.
  • Explains that the oklahoma city bombing was an anti-government terrorist act with ideologies founded in aryan nations.
  • Analyzes how the community and country came together to assist in the clean up and rescue effort. the public disregarded their own safety to continue to help the victims of the attack.
  • Explains that the secondary reactions to the bombing consisted of force protection improvements and legislative acts.
  • Concludes that terrorism has already left its mark on american institutions.
  • Explains that the fbi linked mcveigh to group after bombing.
Get Access