Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Oedipus the king as a tragedy
Oedipus the king as a tragedy
Oedipus the king as a tragedy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Bad things happen to good people. It’s a life lesson that’s well-illustrated in many plays. Lope de Vega’s Fuente Ovejuna and Sophocles’ Oedipus the King are two prime examples. Fuente Ovejuna features a small Spanish town of the same name which is unjustly oppressed by a man named Commander Gomez and his subordinates. Oedipus the King features Oedipus, a man doomed by a prophecy to murder his father and marry his mother. Many would argue that both plays are tragedies. Although both certainly feature strong tragic elements, thoroughly examining the final condition of the protagonists, society’s final condition, and the way fate is represented in the final scenes of each play proves Fuente Ovejuna is a heroic drama, while Oedipus the King is a tragedy.
The final condition of the protagonist is one of the main factors in determining whether a play is a heroic drama or a tragedy. In Fuente Ovejuna, many argue that the protagonist is the town itself, since each townsperson suffers from the actions of the antagonist, Commander Gomez. This is particularly noticeable in the final scenes of the play, when every member of the town is tortured to reveal the name of Commander Gomez’s murderer. Despite being tortured, the only answer any of the townspeople give the judge is a resounding “Fuente Ovejuna!” When King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella hear of this, they realize they must decide whether they want to pardon the entire town, or execute everyone in Fuente Ovejuna. They meet with the townspeople and announce that since no killer could be named, the town is pardoned. The town rejoices; they fought against Commander Gomez’s tyranny and won, they have a full pardon from the queen and king, and they’re no longer under the control ...
... middle of paper ...
...d decide to take hold of their fate instead of passively watching it unfold. This coincides with the final condition of the protagonist and society; since they fight for what they believe in, they reap the benefits at the end of the play.
In the final scenes of Fuente Ovejuna, the protagonist and society are in a far better position than they were at the beginning of the play. Fate is represented as something they can change by taking their destinies into their own hands and fighting for what they believe in, they emerge victorious in the end. In Oedipus the King, Oedipus fulfills a prophecy, ensuring his demise and the society he lives in, with no power to control his destiny. These characteristics distinguish the two plays from one another and help to illuminate how Fuente Ovejuna is much more of a heroic drama than a tragedy, like Oedipus the King.
Classical tragedy is one of the most popular sorts of tragedy. The main ideas of classical tragedies include pity and fear for the victim; downfall from a high position for the main character. They usually end in the death of the protagonist, they start in harmony and end in chaos, and it is usually the innocent character that suffers. Sophocles’ ‘Oedipus Rex’ is probably the most famous classical tragedy ever written. Sophocles first produced the play in Athens around 430 B.C. at the Great Dionysian, a religious and cultural festival held in honour of the god Dionysus. The story of ‘Oedipus Rex’ is about a boy who is fated to kill his father, and marry his mother. One of the main features of classical tragedies is that whatever is ‘fated’ to happen, during the story, will always happen, and the characters cannot change it, it is an inevitable tragedy.
Originating in Greece, tragedies were and remain a common and popular form of dramatic entertainment. To be considered an authentic tragedy, the protagonist must be one of aristocracy. This noble character begins the story as a likeable person whose destined fate is foreshadowed in dramatic irony to the reader. The reader is aware of the errors in judgment that the protagonist is inflicting on oneself. As the last to discover one’s unfortunate fate, the protagonist is devastated. The revelation is far too much to bear; therefore, the protagonist either commits suicide or inflicts pain or mutilation onto oneself. “Oedipus the King” reflects all of the essential components of a tragedy; however, “Death of a Salesman” lacks some of these defining characteristics. In “Death of a Salesman” the protagonist is not a “tragic hero” (Kennedy, Gioia 1282) like Oedipus. He lacks the nobility that is a prerequisite to being...
Oedipus Rex. A play that enacts the story of a man who’s ignorance, battle with fate over his free will, and his blindness to truth; lead him into his own demise. With so many critical elements in one play, there must be a climax where all of these elements come together and culminate into one key passage.The passage in lines 350-450 accomplishes this. In this passage there are several elements, but there are five significant ones: character development, the theme of: ignorance, fate versus free-will, and blindness to truth are revealed; and there is also foreshadowing of Oedipus’ demise as a result of these elements. The purpose of this essay will be to investigate these elements and establish this passage as a key passage of Oedipus Rex.
The ancient Greeks were famous for their tragedies. These dramas functioned to “ask questions about the nature of man, his position in the universe, and the powers that govern his life” (“Greek” 1). Brereton (1968) stated that tragedies typically “involved a final and impressive disaster due to an unforeseen or unrealized failure involving people who command respect and sympathy. It often entails an ironical change of fortune and usually conveys a strong impression of waste. It is always accompanied by misery and emotional distress” (20). The play, Oedipus the King, by Sophocles definitely demonstrated the characteristics of an impressive disaster unforeseen by the protagonist that involved a character of respect, included irony, and was accompanied by misery and emotional distress.
In Oedipus Rex, the writer Sophocles shows the inaccuracy of human enlightenment through the tragic character of Oedipus, whose firm belief that he has full knowledge ultimately leads to his downfall through injustice and uncertainty. The Scholar Bernard Knox once wrote that “knowledge, certainty, and justice – are all qualities Oedipus thought he possessed – and that is why he was the perfect example of human knowledge, certainty, and justice.” Oedipus’ belief that he had full knowledge led him to make false assumptions resulting in inadequate certainties. These certainties furthermore, led Oedipus to administer what he though was true justice, but was in fact the exact opposite, bringing his lacking of the truth full-circle.
...eveloped into a full out tragedy. This incorporation of incidents induces a sense of apprehension, where the audience easily realizes Oedipus’ fate, and lethal flaw. Oedipus’ hubris indeed becomes an undeniable fact influencing the protagonists turn of events. Every institution of self-righteous comments appears to have an enormous effect on the structural molding of the play itself. Many of the protagonist’s feelings and acknowledgements seem to underline the phases expressed in an indicative play or plot. Sophocles was right in coaxing a more understandable exposition where the audience knows of the fatal future, and in doing so successfully applies Oedipus’ hardships and weaknesses as an essential and vital allotment to an archetypal tragedy.
Sophocles’ Oedipus King and Shakespeare's Hamlet both contain the basic elements of tragedy, although the Shakespearean tragedy expanded its setting far beyond that of the ancient Greek tragedy. The tragic hero of Hamlet finds himself burdened with the task of avenging his father's death from the start of the play, and is not himself the source of the pollution of regicide, while Oedipus is of course the unwitting fashioner of his own doom, which is unveiled to him through recognition and repentance.
They were both caused by the same thing, which was a tragic character flaw. Oedipus was full of hubris. He was so proud, and he thought there was no possible way that it was his own fault. His pride was also partly because of the fact that he solved the riddle to get rid of the last plague, and this is why he became king. The people loved him so much after that. However, Othello’s tragic flaw was his raging jealousy. This was such a problem that he actually killed the girl that he was in love with because of his jealousy. He was also very gullible. He barely needed any convincing from Iago to become suspicious of his own wife. To make the two even more closely related, Othello also suffered from hubris. This ties in with killing his wife. He felt the need to kill her because his pride was hurt by her “affair.” He did not want to be made to be a fool, so he killed her. Therefore, both of these stories include ironies that are caused by a tragic flaw in the main characters. This means that the ironies in Oedipus Rex and Othello reinforce each other by teaching the audience to not be proud or jealous. These are both common flaws that almost everybody deals with, but if we let them get out of hand, we could end up like Othello or
The tragic hero is defined by Aristotle as "a great man who is neither a paragon of virtue and justice nor undergoes the change to misfortune through any real badness or wickedness but because of some mistake” (Aristotle n. pag.). There are a few principles that Aristotle believes to form a tragic hero: the protagonist should be a person of power and nobility, who makes a major error in judgment and eventually comes to realization of his or her actions (Aristotle n. pag.). In Arthur Millers’ play, Death of a Salesman, he has twisted Aristotle’s belief of a tragic hero, and has created his own. Although Miller has twisted Aristotle’s belief, Sophocles’ play, Oedipus Rex, has a tragic hero (Oedipus) that follows the flaws, dignity, and acknowledgment of the truth that Aristotle believes in to make a tragic hero. It is essential for them to recognize their position and role in the play. Due to the fact that Willy Loman and Oedipus experience tragic flaws throughout their respected plays, they both have nobility, and they both realize the fact (anagnorisis) that they made an error in their life (hamartia). Through their fatal mis-steps, their pride and ego, predominately affect their familial lives, which in turn causes them to realize the truth that they are tragic heroes.
Although classified as a tragedy, Oedipus Rex by Sophocles greatly focuses on the investigation of a mystery. Oedipus must discover who murdered Laios, the former king of Thebes, then exile or kill this person to end a plague befallen upon Thebes. The solution of the mystery, although important to the plot, is not as great a revelation as the knowledge gained through the investigation. The investigation elucidates the theme one can not escape the power of fate and ubiquitous beings.The enigma of the murder of Laios and the investigation of is the majority of the plot and displays the power of kismet.
Oedipus Rex qualifies as a tragedy. It fits all the characteristics as defined by Aristotle. The tragic hero of a play is a man of some social standing and personal reputation, but sufficiently like ourselves in terms of his weaknesses that we feel fear and pity when a tragic flaw, rather than an associate, causes his downfall. Oedipus is the tragic hero in this play for many reasons. Even though he does not know it, he fulfills the oracle's prophecy by killing his father, Laius, and then sleeping with his mother, Jocasta. His father was just a tragic mistake. Oedipus thought that the person he killed was just a random person that was harassing him.
Is it destiny or pure luck? Written by Sophocles, King Oedipus is a story of dramatic irony, tragedy, sadness, and pity. Oedipus is destined to kill his father and marry his mother. Prophesized to bring disaster, Oedipus is a tragic hero who will bring destruction to him self. Oedipus is a tragic hero because he is doomed from the beginning, yet noble in nature, physically and mentally wounded, with a pitiful story, and suffers more than he deserves.
Paulo Coelho once said, “Tragedy always brings radical changes in our lives, a change that is associated with the same principle of loss.” In Poetics, Aristotle describes the qualities of a tragedy and uses the character of King Oedipus as a perfect example of tragedy. In the modern world, authors continued to create tragedies as depicted in the modern book of Death of a Salesman. Considering the time difference between the two books, one is left wondering how the concept of tragedy has remained relevant for many centuries, and whether in the modern world tragedy has changed in any way. In light of these facts, the author gives a personal definition of tragedy and examines the tales of Oedipus the King and Death
Throughout Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex, Oedipus frantically searched for the truth, but due to his pride, remained blind to his own connection to the dire plague that infected Thebes.
Oedipus the King by Sophocles has the ingredients necessary for a good Aristotelian tragedy. The play has the essential parts that form the plot, consisting of the peripeteia, anagnorisis and a catastrophe; which are all necessary for a good tragedy according to the Aristotelian notion. Oedipus is the perfect tragic protagonist, for his happiness changes to misery due to hamartia (an error). Oedipus also evokes both pity and fear in its audience, causing the audience to experience catharsis or a purging of emotion, which is the true test for any tragedy according to Aristotle.