Obama's Argument Against Islamic Terrorism

After the recent atrocity in Orlando, Florida, it’s now back to the drawing board for our friends of the regressive left. It’s been a magnificent year, already, for the rise of SJW lunacy, hysteria, and full-scale stupidity. But even in the face of inhumanity which was inspired irrefutably by an Islamic stigma of homosexuality, we see the left thrashing about with an agenda – an agenda so irrelevant, so trivial, so Utopian, that it’s not only laughable in itself, but hazardous to the survival of the most tolerant and free-thinking culture in the world.

In the wake of Orlando, ardent progressives, namely President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, have pivoted to gun control, and some have even gone so far to blame the GOP. But Obama’s response to the attack is the most appalling. His blunder in accountability reflects one in how his administration counteracts the threat of global Islamic terrorism. In his speech, Obama hastily reaffirmed his call for tighter gun restrictions:

This

Have leftists honestly not reached their endgame? This, in itself, seems to signify a losing cry, given McKernan purposely expunges all the empirical evidence presented to her by the right. Or she seems to have researched little to none on the subject – and I don’t like pulling that card. Omar Mateen is not a Columbine shooter or a Sandy Hook shooter – he pledged allegiance to the Islamic State, a regime that’s earned backing from sixteen percent of French Muslims, 1.5 million British Muslims, as well as 81 percent of Arabs who responded to an al-Jazeera poll. Accounting for the expansive support Muslims all over the world seem to have for Islamic terror, from 9/11, 7/7, to Orlando, something is, perhaps, amiss with the religion,