Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Collectivism vs individualism easy
Case of individualism versus collectivism
Individualism vs collectivism social theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Collectivism vs individualism easy
Individuality is the substance that differentiates us from each other. One’s individuality can be very hard to hold to when society is constantly demanding that we conform into its norms. It is a constant struggle for us as individuals to hold onto our sense of style, manner of speech and even our expression of thoughts while having to battle the constant bombardments of laws that supposedly keep us just. Although, these laws have imposed on our supposed inalienable rights which are “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”, we have kept them because within a set limit we can freely express ourselves (Jefferson 262). However, our government has recently decided to destroy the very last bit of this limited freedom we had left.
This freedom is the very basis for individuality and it is also the foundational idea for which our nation has been rooted upon. Then why has the government turned against this foundational idea? It has become evident that the rising national debt is causing tremor within the government but is that enough of a reason to adopt a new style of governing? Our government proposes peace and unity of this nation as long as we give up our individuality to the ruler ship of Barack Obama, who has decided to adopt the teachings of Lao-Tzu, which states that the president-the master-is“above the people” (Lao-Tzu 214). When the president begins to esteem himself to be higher than his people, there is no longer a representation of the people; it has now become a declaration of a sovereign ruler-the master. It has become evident that we have forgotten the wars that were fought to liberate us from the system of a monarchy and we have now allowed a system that is far worse. Therefore any leader that accepts such a syste...
... middle of paper ...
...be abused and perverted before the people can act through it” (Thoreau 305). The government that was once a protector of the weak, the minorities and even the bullied has now become an attacker of not only one’s individuality but also the society as a whole because of its desire to become efficient. One rights to their personal religion is being destroy
Furthermore, in every teaching of Loa Tzu, he emphasizes that the world needed to submit to the “natural rhythms” of the Toa in order for the “whole world to be transformed” because it is impossible for an individual or individuals to “improve the world” unless they were the master-the sovereign ruler, whose attributes are god-like ( Loa-Tzu, 208-209). Therefore, the idea of one’s individuality is not supported under the current of Toa because every being under the system of Toa must be subjugated under the Master’s.
Everyday we have the chance to make her own opinions and give reason to our own voice. We have the chance to live in a country that encourages freedom in society, which separate ourselves from any restrictions imposed upon by authority, actions or any political views. liberty is the power we possess to act as we please through freedom and independence. But what happens when we choose to give away our basic liberties for temporary safety? Benjamin Franklin once stated, “They who give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Those who decide to give away their personal freedoms for something that is temporary do not see the value in the long-lasting gift called freedom. In
insist on our right of and capacity for being self-governing individuals. But we find ourselves again under the rule of a king - an authority exterior to the self. This time, however, we cannot as easily identify the king and declare our independence." Despite
From the opening sentence of the essay, “We are free to be you, me, stupid, and dead”, Roger Rosenblatt hones in on a very potent and controversial topic. He notes the fundamental truth that although humans will regularly shield themselves with the omnipresent first amendment, seldom do we enjoy having the privilege we so readily abuse be used against us.
...n a government is the group that states what is to be socially acceptable and what is not, it greatly hinders a person ability to act as an individual. Whether it is the fear of being classified as abnormal, false or unjust imprisonment, or making a show out of large groups of the abnormal people, it is all in order for the government to maintain control. Within both of these contexts it is more important for there to be a strong central government than to allow a person to truly be an unique, which in return takes away what is considered to be a persons right.
The most valuable aspects of individualism is the freedom to speak and to express are feelings that is what makes us human, as President Robert F. Kennedy stated in his Day of Affirmation Address that “…the first element of this individual liberty is the freedom of speech: the right to express and communicate ideas, to set oneself apart from the dumb beasts of field and forest…” My family came to the U.S. because of the promises of freedom. When we were in India we could not speak ill of the politics that were corrupt because if we did there would be chaos and riots. As we came to America we found that we did not have to look constantly behind are backs when we criticized the government until the Patriot Act was put into place but now we can not express are feelings due to the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act fails to secure American liberties but that the act exposes the weakness in the U.S. government. The act encourages government corruption, secrecy, fraud and discrimination and violates are constitution. The government uses the national security as a pretense for violating our constitutional rights; for example the freedom of speech and our privacy (Day).
It is thus distressing to read in David Bernstein’s excellent book how anti-discrimination laws are being used to undermine civil liberties, such as the freedom of speech, in the very home of liberty itself. The US courts have in the past upheld freedom of speech, even where it might seem to encourage crime or subversion, but they have allowed anti-discrimination laws to over-rule freedom of speech. Once again the drive for equality is revealed as the greatest enemy of individual freedom.
As James Madison, the fourth President of the United States said, “The religion of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man, and it is right of every man to exercise it as they may dictate” (Haynes, C...
Proponents of a highly limited separation of church and state often argue that America’s founding fathers would be appalled at the extent to which the Judeo...
Hawley, Helen, and Gary Taylor. "Freedom of religion in America." Contemporary Review 282.1649 (2003): 344+. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
America is a free a nation with a Bill of Rights that provides every citizen of this country the freedom and protection of the inalienable rights granted to them. However, there are certain actions that have stirred controversy as to how far those protections and freedoms can be stretched. Throughout history there have been numerous cases involving the Bill of Rights and the amount of freedom and or protection granted by each one. The First Amendment, the protection of free speech, has garnered much attention due to the increasingly negative and violent expressions America has come to know. The morality and public decency that Americans used to hold dear has been lost. In a world of constant input, Americans have becom...
In “Resistance to Civil Government,” Thoreau articulates the importance he places on resistance against a powerful, controlling government. He opens his essay with a reference to the...
Individualism in today’s society is the “belief that each person is unique, special, and a ‘basic unit of nature’.” The individualism concept puts an “emphasis on individual initiative” where people act independently of others and use self-motivation to prosper. The individualists “value privacy” over community the individual thrives to move ahead in life (U S Values).
Individuality and conformity both play a major role in society. No matter what it may be individuals will need to choose appropriately between conforming and acting individualistically about their situation. Individuality allows individuals to freely express themselves while conformity offers safety under the protection of other conformers. Both of these aspects are beneficial to many individuals and is a key to maintaining societal order; however, it is disastrous to have too much of either side of the spectrum. Therefore, there should be a balance between individuality and conformity because having too much of either side morally and physically harms components of society, such that it pressures and forces individuals to do tasks against their will, and causes individuals to think selfishly and worry solely about themselves.
An individual does not make a community, and a community does not make a society. In order to have a functioning and prosperous society, one must relinquish some free will in return for protection. According to John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty, there are certain rights of the individual which the government may never possess. Centuries after the publication of Mill’s Essay, the court case Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegeta l, 546 U.S. 418 (2006) challenged the protective role of government against the free exercise of religion.
... of the majority, the minority endures oppression. The quality of government suffers when it has been mixed too much with religion, and the quality of religious motives suffer when they have been polluted by political motives.