Skip to Content (press Enter/Return)
preview

OJ Simpson Case

explanatory Essay
759 words
Open Document
759 words
  • Small
  • Normal
  • Large
  • Huge
bookmark

Americans sat, eyes glued to the television as they watched the famous Buffalo Bills running back fight for his innocence. The O.J. Simpson case is one of the most controversial cases in the United States. “In addition to the inflaming media frenzy and public obsession, the celebrity and racial dimensions of the Simpson case have had a profound impact on what is going on in courtrooms today.”() A case full of disasters. Racist cops, troubled relationships, lack of useful evidence, jury based on color and gender, the dream team. This trial changed the way we look a fairness in the courtroom.

One of the key parts to solving a crime is gathering evidence. It can either make or break any criminal case. Objects, stains, etc are handled with the utmost care. If anything were to ruined, the case would be lost. “Proper processing of the crime by crime scene investigators ensures that evidence won't be overlooked or accidentally destroyed.”()Proper attire includes latex gloves, to prevent the investigators fingerprints from transferring to the evidence, and footwear, to not track foreign substance or shoe prints on the scene. Blood samples and DNA are important in cases too. When investigators collect the samples, they …show more content…

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the o.j. simpson case is one of the most controversial cases in the united states. it has had a profound impact on what is going on in courtrooms today.
  • Opines that proper processing of crime scene investigators ensures that evidence won't be overlooked or accidentally destroyed.
  • Opines that mr. simpson's case was full of racial tension, and the judge of this case would have to see the trial as a murder charge.
  • Explains that the prosecutors were the first to tell the jury their facts in the mr. simpson case.
  • Explains that the defense team was nicknamed the "dream team" and that they had an unfair advantage over the prosecution with the media.

In the Mr. Simpson case, the prosecuting team was Marica Clark, Christopher Darden and William Hodgeman. All were extremely successful. But there are always flaws. Marcia was seen as very aggressive. Darden was thought to only be on the case because he was African American. Hodgeman dropped out of the trial after it had begun. “The prosecution, by casting the murders as a predictable endgame of wife abuse, has opened the way to rebuttal by expert testimony for the defense. The prosecution was focused mainly on the murder charges, so when race became the big issue they had nothing. They brought good evidence and points to the case but the end game changed and they weren’t

Get Access
Check Writing Quality

Let Our AI Magic Supercharge Your Grades!

    Related
    • analytical
    • explanatory
    • opinion
    • Analysis Of Oj Simpson
      analytical essay
      On the night of the deaths Fuhrman went to O.J Simpson’s house and supposedly unveiled a glove that he believed took part in the murders. When the evidence of the glove was presented in court Simpson was asked to put it on and unexpectedly the glove didn’t fit. People then began to believe that Mark was setting Simpson up and was trying to frame him. Soon after the glove scandal was public it slowly began to racially divide society and became a watershed moment. A great deal of African-Americans felt as if most of the white people just viewed Simpson as a black male and didn’t even take into consideration other aspects of the case. But a various amount of white people felt as if all the evidence had been presented so he had to be the murderer. A Handful of African-Americans knew that as soon as the evidence of Fuhrman being racist came out he had to of framed Simpson. Shortly after the evidence became public Joseph Rouzan who was a black detective that worked with Fuhrman decided to do an interview and stated that “Fuhrman was a part of white officers that caused problems for young black female officers

      In this essay, the author

      • Opines that the o.j simpson trial will forever have an impact on american society and social norms.
      • Explains that nicole brown's ex-husband o.j was the main suspect after his dna was discovered on both of the victims' bodies, leading to a seventy-five-mile-long car chase.
      • Explains that o.j simpson's net worth at the time was approximately eleven million dollars (noble). he was a running back for the 49ers and had his family and beautiful wife.
      • Opines that people's perspectives of celebrities allow them think as if they're on a pedestal and are more important than the average human.
      • Explains that the simpson trial changed the way we view celebrities today. it allowed people to realize that celebrities are just like us and can be capable of doing horrible deeds.
      • Analyzes how the trial changed the way most americans view celebrities and racially divided society.
      • Analyzes how the evidence of fuhrman being racist changed the public's view of the case.
      • Explains that fuhrman claimed to have noticed a knife at the crime scene, but another officer said that there was no knife present. the trial caused tension between the way whites and african-americans interact with each other.
      • Concludes that the o.j simpson trial altered the way americans viewed celebrities by showing that being important and having money doesn't compose them any different than an average person.
      • Cites adams,lorraine, "past paints troubling portrait of simpson". the washington post, 22 august 1995.
      • Analyzes how cavasseur,derrick, did o.j do it? discovery, 6th febuary 2017, news paper source plus.
      • Cites johnson, edward, "o.j simpson murder case". salem press encyclopedia, 2009, research starters.
      • Cites historystaff's article, "o.j simpson acquitted".
      1390 words
      Read More
    • The O.J Simpson Trial
      analytical essay
      ...lled believed the verdict was right (“The Trial”). Another reason this trial has been important to the American judicial system and overall history is because although there was much evidence pointing to Simpson for committing the murder, he did have some of the best attorneys in the business and that showed the American public that possibly money or even celebrity status could get you out of murder. People began to think that if money has something to do with whether or not you’re guilty of something, poverty will ensure you injustice (“OJ”). The case brought into question fundamental tenets of U.S. law as the presumption of innocence, the adversarial trial, and the right to trial by jury (Kronenwetter). Many people believe that you can not understand the law system until you understand the O.J Simpson trial, and it is a trial that will always be remembered (“OJ”).

      In this essay, the author

      • Analyzes how the o.j simpson trial changed the view that there was no more racial division in our country due to the outcome of the trial.
      • Narrates how simpson excelled in football, and made a break into the film industry before retiring from his professional football career. he married marguerite whitley in 1977 and married nicole brown in 1985.
      • Explains that nicole brown simpson and ronald goldman were murdered outside brown's condo in los angeles, california. all evidence led to o.j simpson who had divorced from brown only two years earlier.
      • Explains that the first day of the trial, people v. simpson, began on july 24th, 1995. the prosecution alone put 72 witnesses on the stand, including brown's family.
      • Analyzes how the jury empathized with simpson's family and the lapd officer who found the bloodied glove at his home. simpson was found not guilty of the murder of nicole brown and ronald goldman.
      • Analyzes how the o.j simpson murder trial had a strong impact on the american public. many whites believed simpson committed the murders, while most african americans believed he did not commit them.
      • Analyzes how the o.j simpson trial has been important to the american judicial system and overall history, since it brought into question fundamental tenets of u.s. law.
      1293 words
      Read More
    • The Case Of OJ Simpson
      analytical essay
      Two dead bodies and one very guilty man, but no jail time. The OJ Simpson murder trial in 94’ may have been the biggest happening in that year. The bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman were found stabbed to death in Nicole’s home in LA. OJ was boarding a flight when the murders went public; he quickly became the first suspect in the case. The trial went on and the jury found him not guilty of the murders, despite overwhelming evidence showing his connection to the murder. In the controversial case of the killings of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, the innocent ruling incorrectly acquitted O.J. Simpson; OJ killed both of them because he possessed a motive, attempted to escape and cover up the crime,

      In this essay, the author

      • Analyzes how the oj simpson murder trial in 94' may have been the biggest happening in that year. nicole brown simpson and ron goldman were stabbed to death in nicole’s home in la.
      • Analyzes how oj simpson and nicole had a rough relationship before the killings, and his shaky past contributed to his actions.
      • Analyzes how oj attempted to escape before and after the murder accusation went public. the flight left only two hours after nicole and ron were murdered, which gave him plenty of time to arrange his getaway.
      • Explains that the murder weapon was a knife, and blood was spread throughout the house. o. j. simpson's blood matched that of nicole brown simpson.
      • Explains why oj's blood was on the scene and why articles of clothing he was seen wearing were covered in blood. the gloves shrunk due to the blood, but it was a bad idea for the prosecutor to put them on.
      • Argues that in the controversial case of nicole simpson and ron goldman, the innocent ruling incorrectly acquitted o.j. simpson; oj killed both of them because he had motive, attempted to escape and cover up the crime, and forensic evidence linked him to the bodies.
      1324 words
      Read More
    • Oj Simpson Case
      explanatory essay
      Orenthal James Simpson or better known as O.J. Simpson was accused of two murders that took place in front of Nicole Brown’s house. Both Nicole Brown and her best friend Ron Goldman were slashed. The murder trial was a big thing in the 1990’s. Millions and millions of people watched the televised news of the chase with O.J. Simpson and the police. He had fans lined up on the side of the road cheering him on, due to the fact that he is not guilty. He wanted the fame he had before the murders but he never got the fame back. After a decade of the murder trials he committed another crime that placed him back in prison.

      In this essay, the author

      • Explains that o.j. simpson was accused of two murders that took place in front of nicole brown’s house. millions of people watched the televised news of the chase with the police.
      • Explains that o.j. simpson was born in san francisco, california, and married marguerite whitley on june 24, 1967. he was the first runner to gain two thousand rushing yards.
      • Describes how o.j. simpson was a prime suspect in the murders of nicole brown and ron goldman.
      • Explains that o.j. simpson didn't surrender; he left the state and went to stay in a hotel. a tip was given to the police, and the man at the motel was not simpson.
      • Explains that police have found blood stains on clothing and on the vehicle, a knife that was the murder weapon, bloody shoe prints in at the crime scene and in the driveway of simpson’s home.
      • Describes lance allan ito's murder trial, which began on january 24th, 1995. he told the jury that he loved nicole and would never hurt her.
      • Narrates how o.j. simpson returned to court to defend himself against a civil suit claiming that he was liable for the wrongful deaths of brown and goldman.
      • Analyzes how o.j. simpson wrote a suicide note to his family and friends. he said he was thankful for his friends and was sorry for the goldman family.
      • Explains that o.j. simpson was released on parole after nearly a decade behind bars in nevada. he was charged with armed robbery, kidnapping, and burglary.
      • Explains that o.j. simpson was a prime suspect in the nicole brown and ronald goldman murder case. he had to pay $8.5 million dollars for the family.
      1471 words
      Read More
    • Legal Tension, Social Issues, and the OJ Simpson Trial
      analytical essay
      The O.J. Simpson trial, as it became known, opened on January 24, 1995 and concluded October 3 the same year. Over the span of the trial, the prosecution team presented 72 witnesses including friends and family of Nicole, friends of O.J., and a 9-1-1 dispatcher. Given the trial’s notable and well-known defendant, those involved in the trial gained lifetime fame. To this day I can still recall the names Judge Lance Ito, Marcia Clark (Deputy District Attorney), and Simpson’s defense counsel, “The Dream Team,” which consisted of a number of high-profile attorneys, most notably Robert Shapiro and Johnnie Cochran. I chose this case because it left a lasting impression in my memory, as well as a lasting impression in our nation’s memory. There have been many high-profile cases over the years, but this case was not predicted to end the way it di...

      In this essay, the author

      • Analyzes how the media's influence over the masses of society continues to impress. the 1990s served an important decade in our country’s young history.
      • Explains that the o.j. simpson trial, as it became known, opened on january 24, 1995 and concluded october 3, the same year.
      • Analyzes how tensions in the legal system stemmed from the cities and suburbs, where there was an explosion of violent crime rates.
      • Explains that in the 1990s, there was a vast amount of tensions in legal system, which not only affected this case, but was also planted in every person's minds.
      • Cites baker, s., bound, j. and groeneveld, e.
      785 words
      Read More
    • The O. J Simpson Case
      analytical essay
      case during 1995, they all believed that he was innocent and was being framed by a racist police department that many African-Americans had encountered throughout the years. For many people the trial became something else, “The O.J. Simpson trial was for many black people less about O.J. Simpson, but instead frustration we were having with the criminal justice system.” (Howard) You could even say among many African-Americans that there was a feeling of enjoyment when the verdict was read. For many of them have been, or knew someone going through the justice system and felt they were not getting the fair treatment that they should be getting. Yet here they have a figure in O.J. to rally around that they believe was innocent and finally beat the system. While those in the Caucasian community saying that the trial was a farce and he should have been found guilty. African-Americans could now sit there and say now that the Caucasian community knows how it feels to want justice to be served properly and not get it. Whether many admit it or not, the thought that the system can be beaten and that there is chance for them to be able to finally fight back and win must have crossed many peoples mind. They came together feeling that the system let them down, and an understanding of each other knowing that they have gone through similar

      In this essay, the author

      • Explains that the o.j. simpson trial was a day of triumph against the system that has not been known to be on the side of minorities.
      • Narrates how rodney king, a known deviant, was pulled over for driving while under the influence in 1991. the trial caused many african-americans to become angry since many had gone to many similar experiences with police officers.
      • Analyzes how the 1994 violent crime and law enforcement act was an attack on poorer communities and african-americans. the bill enacted tougher sentencing guidelines for minor crimes, removed the ability for those in prison to receive education, and eliminated social programs.
      • Analyzes how the rodney king beating, the crime bill, and the o.j. simpsons trial brought many african-americans together to better understand what their fellow family members or neighbors were going through.
      • Analyzes how many african-americans watched the o.j. simpson trial in 1995, believing that he was innocent and being framed by a racist police department.
      • Opines that in order to progress as a culture, people need to come to better understanding of each other. the inequalities in society will never be addressed.
      1364 words
      Read More
    • The Case Of Oj Simpson
      analytical essay
      The racial earthquake that spread through the home televisions, and car radios of America on January 25th 1995 caused nationwide turmoil. O.J. Simpson was a rising superstar athlete, and actor at the time of his trial for the Double Murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman. The opposing opinions on the case spread like wild fire and opinions on his innocence differed greatly. The trial’s impact on media, forensics, and society has forever changed America.

      In this essay, the author

      • Analyzes how the racial earthquake that spread through the home televisions, and car radios of america on january 25th 1995 caused nationwide turmoil. o.j. simpson was a rising superstar athlete and actor at the time of his trial for the double murder
      • Analyzes how o.j. simpson's troublesome childhood is often used against him as proof that he had the means, ability, and quite possibly the motive to kill nicole brown.
      • Analyzes how nicole kept a diary, but some of her entries were chilling as she described the anger in the relationship, along with the hitting, and kicking that was invovled.
      • Explains that nicole brown, ronald goldman, and o.j. simpson were found lifeless inside nicole’s los angeles brentwood residency on june 12th 1994.
      • Explains that o.j.'s fingerprints were improperly logged during investigation which fed the allegations of a possible racist-police or investigative team attempting to frame simpson.
      • Analyzes how o.j. simpson's upcoming release from a nevada correctional facility resurfaced the topic of racial divide after he was found not guilty of murder.
      849 words
      Read More
    • Case Study Oj Simpson
      explanatory essay
      The double murder case of O.J. Simpson is one that will live on forever and one that will never be forgotten. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found dead at Nicole’s home in Los Angeles. According to Doug Linder, it was “most likely a single male that came through the back entrance of Nicole Brown Simpson’s condominium” (Linder). Since they did not have any other suspects they went right to Orenthal James Simpson who was Nicole Simpson’s ex-husband. Law enforcement had seen him as suspicious and they had charged him with both of the murders. The case had gone to trial and it was the prosecutor’s job to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson was guilty and that he had done the crime. Simpson had what was called

      In this essay, the author

      • Explains that criminology is the scientific study of crime and criminal behavior, including their manifestations, causes, legal aspects, and control.
      • Explains that simpson was charged with two counts of murder with special circumstances, but after further reading the actual case, he was found not guilty.
      • Explains that capital punishment is the lawful infliction of death as a punishment, and that there are different methods such as lethal injection, electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, firing squad.
      • Opines that the double murder case of o.j. simpson is one that will live on forever.
      • Explains that the criminal process is different from state to state. the defense was saying that this was a racist case because the police only went after him because he was black.
      • Opines that the division of probation and correctional alternatives is a great program instead of just going to jail.
      1935 words
      Read More
    • O.J. Simpson Trial: Did He Do It?
      explanatory essay
      "O. J. Simpson." UXL Biographies. Detroit: U*X*L, 2011. Student Resources in Context. Web. 2 Dec. 2013

      In this essay, the author

      • Analyzes how orenthal o.j. simpson became a football hall of fame, actress, and serial killer out of love or spight. he was raised in the potrero hill housing projects for low-income families.
      • Narrates how o.j.'s mother would stop vacations just to see her son doing the things that he enjoys. he thanked her during his acceptance speech for his position in the pro football hall of fame.
      • Describes how simpson and al a.c. cowlings joined the persian warriors when they were 14 years old. after being incarcerated for theft, the neighborhood youth leader asked the san francisco giants center fielder, willie mays, to spend the afternoon with simpson to give him an insight on life without extras.
      • Explains that simpson and cowlings joined the football team in high school and were both named to the all-city team. simpson thought he had a greater chance at being recruited into college, but his field ability didn't match the academic standards of being accepted.
      • Describes how simpson averaged 10 yards when he received the ball and gained an average of 171 yards per game. simpson won the heisman trophy in 1968.
      • Explains that simpson joined the buffalo bills in 1969 along with cowlings. by 1973, he had made a record with twenty-three touchdowns and gained 250 rushing yards in one game.
      • Narrates how simpson divorced his wife after the death of his youngest daughter. simpson met nicole brown and they became exclusive. marguerite was unhappy with the ongoing affair.
      • Narrates how simpson was arrested for spousal abuse, put on probation, and ordered to give $500 to a shelter for battered women. nicole brown and ronald lyle goldman were murdered in 1994.
      • Explains that simpson released a book, i want to tell you, in response to letters written to him while incarcerated. the o.j. simpson trail became the most publicized and broke all previous tv viewing records.
      • Explains that simpson was awarded custody of his two children with nicole. the browns family made amends for the children's sake and left it as it was.
      • Explains that simpson was planning to release a hypothetical tell all book stating how he would have killed brown and goldman. the goldman family took ownership of the book and renamed it if i did it:
      • Opines that simpson was the only suspect capable of killing nicole and her male friend. the book was a way of him telling the world that he did it.
      1187 words
      Read More
    • kay
      opinion essay
      There is always that underlying question that lingers in the back of people’s minds when a jury’s verdict has been reached: Was justice served? Justice by definition is the process or result of using laws to fairly judge and punish crimes and criminals, but unfortunately in our judicial system justice has not always prevailed. Such as in many cases we've studied throughout the year. Justice in our system is based on a multitude of facets that include issues relating to forensic evidence, racial bias and one’s own moral code. Thus, we are left with a system that people really cannot live by and trust. The West Memphis Three, Friedman, the JFK assignation, Michael Peterson, and the O.J. Simpson case are all instances in which people have studied that arouse questions into the issues of justice. Looking back at each one of these cases, there is much to scrutinize and plenty of room for improvements within our system.

      In this essay, the author

      • Opines that justice is the process of using laws to fairly judge and punish crimes and criminals, but justice has not always prevailed in our judicial system. the west memphis three, friedman, jfk assignation, michael peterson, and the o.j. simpson case arouse questions into justice.
      • Explains that the west memphis three were tried and convicted for the murders of three young boys. the prosecution claimed the deaths were sacrifices for a satanic cult.
      • Analyzes how the arkansas supreme court ruled that misskelley's confession was voluntary and that he understood the miranda warning and its consequences.
      • Explains how damien echol's lawyer filed papers for a retrial in 2007 citing dna evidence linking terry hobbs to the crime scene, and new statements from hobbes' now ex-wife.
      • Opines that for a fair trial, there must have been no negative or positive biases towards the witnesses. imprisoning someone with only half the facts is not justice.
      • Analyzes how community biases played a role in the memphis three case. arnold freidman was caught by the fbi because he was receiving child pornography in the mail.
      • Opines that the police used suggestive questioning when interviewing the victims, which is unethical and can lead to false-statements. arnold and jesse freidman had to fight against this unfair system.
      1000 words
      Read More
    • O. J. Simpson's Trial Sumation Speech
      analytical essay
      On the evening of June 12, 1994, O.J. Simpson -- a former NFL running back – was tried on two counts of murder for murdering both his wife and her friend. His trial spanned for an extensive 9 months, but Simpson’s lawyer, Johnnie Cochran, managed to successfully raise doubts about the accusation with many of his speeches. One of them, the trial summation speech, was especially powerful in helping him reach his purpose. The language that Cochran uses in the speech lends him credibility through his self-alignment with well-renowned figures and his conciliatory gestures, but it more importantly instills doubt as well as igniting anger in the predominantly black, exasperated jury, all in order to empower the jury to acquit O.J. Simpson of the murder

      In this essay, the author

      • Analyzes how simpson's lawyer, johnnie cochran, managed to raise doubts about the accusation with many of his speeches. the speech lends him credibility through his self-alignment with well-known figures and conciliatory gestures, but it instills doubt and anger in the predominantly black, exasperated jury.
      • Analyzes how cochran works towards building his credibility through self-alignment. knowing that his audience is predominantly black, he relates himself to frederick douglass, who is respected by the african-american community.
      • Analyzes how cochran showed appreciation for the exasperated jury by acknowledging that they are "truly a marvelous jury" and referring to the jury's remarkable ability.
      • Analyzes how cochran uses syllogistic language to instill doubts about the prosecution's evidence as well as their argument.
      • Analyzes how cochran calls mark fuhrman a liar because of his perjury, while alluding to the bible supports that statement and strengthens his effect since his mainly christian audience will trust those statements.
      • Analyzes how cochran creates a sense of hatred towards mark fuhrman and hopes to damage his respect.
      • Analyzes how cochran uses language that lends him credibility and undermines the opposition’s validity by instilling doubt and igniting anger in the audience.
      1454 words
      Read More
    • Overview of the O.J Simpson Trial
      analytical essay
      The O.J Simpson trial was one of the most influential trials in the world. All around the United States people were constantly keeping up with what was going on in this trial. People had many different opinions. Most importantly O.J Simpson himself was charged for domestic violence of murdering his wife Nicole Brown Smith and Ronald Goldman.

      In this essay, the author

      • Explains that the o.j simpson trial was one of the most influential trials in the world. he was charged for domestic violence of murdering his wife nicole brown smith and ronald goldman.
      • Analyzes how the o.j. simpson trial showed that rules and decision making has to be more strict and aggressive.
      • Explains that the murder of o.j. simpson's ex-wife nicole brown smith and ronald goldman occurred on june 13th 1994. they had dated for 8 years and married in 1985.
      • Narrates how o.j was obsessed with nicole brown simpson and her two children, sydney brooke and justin ryan simpson.
      968 words
      Read More
    • Oj Simpson Vs The People
      analytical essay
      Athletes and celebrities are always the star; when they play in the championship game, star in an award-winning movie, make the #1 album/single of the year, or win any type of award (Nobel, Pulitzer, Fields, Grammy, Tony, Oscar, etc). Even if they break the law, they still are the star of attention. With the cases of several celebrities and athletes, evidence is apparent of notable unfairness. One of the most popular cases of all time, the O.J. Simpson v. the People, also exhibits huge amounts of obvious inequitable treatment compared to the ordinary people’s cases. Though some people beg to differ with the visible proof that celebrities and athletes do receive undeserved special treatment and say that they just had some “good luck,” there

      In this essay, the author

      • Explains that athletes and celebrities are always the star of attention, even if they break the law. o.j. simpson v. the people exhibits notable inequitable treatment compared to ordinary people's cases.
      • Analyzes the cases of celebrities and athletes receiving special treatment. donte stallworth, a football wide receiver for the new orleans saints, was sentenced to twenty-four days in jail when he did not face any charges.
      • Explains that o.j. simpson was accused of murdering his former wife, nicole brown simpson, and the man of ron goldman. the evidence against the football running back was clear-cut but he received special treatment.
      • Explains that the #1 rule of court in america is everyone must receive fair and equal treatment. fame of athletes and celebrities helps themselves in acquiring this treatment; money is another factor of unfair opportunities and treatment
      • Opines that athletes and celebrities receive special treatment when it comes to breaking the law. the o.j. simpson case shows that the unfairness is evident.
      961 words
      Read More
    • Oj Simpson Analysis
      analytical essay
      Simpson was found not guilty of the criminal charges of murder. The results were broadcasted live and transfixed the public. Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys including Robert Kardashian and Johnnie Cochran helped O.J. Simpson defeat the powerful prosecutor Marcia Clark (ABC News). After her defeat, Clark released this statement: "I felt like I'd let everyone down. The Goldmans. The Browns. My team. The country" (ABC News). She and everybody knew that O.J. Simpson was the killer, but she was unable to prove it. The result came as a shock to the

      In this essay, the author

      • Analyzes how o.j. simpson continued his attempt at innocence when he attended nicole brown simpson’s funeral services with their children. the los angeles district attorney's office was patiently waiting behind the scenes for test and lab results.
      • Describes the "trial of the century" in which o.j. simpson was found not guilty of murder charges.
      • Concludes that brian kaelin played a key role in the trail and the jury's decision to find o.j. not guilty of murder.
      • Analyzes how o.j. simpson's prison-written novel reveals graphic details of the crime scene that only the killer would know.
      • Analyzes how o.j. simpson was a star football player, lebron james of his time, but his fame and glory came crashing down when his wife and male friend were viciously killed.
      • Explains casarez, jean, "attorney ready to collect from o.j. simpson." cnn, cable news network.
      • Explains that o.j. simpson was in a broken relationship with nicole brown simpson. the couple had violent altercations and gruesome scenes.
      • Analyzes how o.j. simpson's life of trouble followed him after his famous case was concluded. he was jailed for armed robbery and kidnapping in las vegas.
      • Cites linder, douglas o., margolick, david, and mead, wendy. the simpson trial: the incriminating evidence.
      1901 words
      Read More
    Get Access