More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial injustice in the judicial system
The importance of investigations in law enforcement
Racial injustice in the judicial system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Americans sat, eyes glued to the television as they watched the famous Buffalo Bills running back fight for his innocence. The O.J. Simpson case is one of the most controversial cases in the United States. “In addition to the inflaming media frenzy and public obsession, the celebrity and racial dimensions of the Simpson case have had a profound impact on what is going on in courtrooms today.”() A case full of disasters. Racist cops, troubled relationships, lack of useful evidence, jury based on color and gender, the dream team. This trial changed the way we look a fairness in the courtroom.
One of the key parts to solving a crime is gathering evidence. It can either make or break any criminal case. Objects, stains, etc are handled with the utmost care. If anything were to ruined, the case would be lost. “Proper processing of the crime by crime scene investigators ensures that evidence won't be overlooked or accidentally destroyed.”()Proper attire includes latex gloves, to prevent the investigators fingerprints from transferring to the evidence, and footwear, to not track foreign substance or shoe prints on the scene. Blood samples and DNA are important in cases too. When investigators collect the samples, they
…show more content…
In the Mr. Simpson case, the prosecuting team was Marica Clark, Christopher Darden and William Hodgeman. All were extremely successful. But there are always flaws. Marcia was seen as very aggressive. Darden was thought to only be on the case because he was African American. Hodgeman dropped out of the trial after it had begun. “The prosecution, by casting the murders as a predictable endgame of wife abuse, has opened the way to rebuttal by expert testimony for the defense. The prosecution was focused mainly on the murder charges, so when race became the big issue they had nothing. They brought good evidence and points to the case but the end game changed and they weren’t
remains of a little girl were found and sure enough it was the body parts of Caylee Anthony. The evidence and surroundings of her death pointed at her mother, however, at the end of the case she was proved to be not guilty for the murder of her child.
People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson was one of America’s most famous cases that brought attention to the black community. This Era played a Logo in the impact, and after effects of this case. A case that brought attention to many American’s, immigrants, nationwide viewers and also, a case that is known to today’s society as the OJ Simpson case. This case raised concern and debate over the black community. Orenthal James Simpson was a wealthy black man that was a retired college
killed his ex-wife along with her male friend on a summer night in 1994? People have their thoughts and opinions on whether the American star, O.J. Simpson, actually committed the well-known double homicide he was accused of thirty years ago. This was a case that had the nation on the edge of their seats, and the result was just as shocking. Whether O.J. Simpson did commit that crime or not is still an ongoing debate in some communities, however, the topic I’d like to discuss is not his innocence, but
High profile cases, flawless police work, and only the most up to date technology, these traits every reality crime show such as CSI or Criminal Minds portray. While it is no surprise that this type of television show is among the most popular, the viewers are beginning to develop a skewed perspective of forensics in the real world. This new mindset is changing more than just the way people perceive science. The misunderstanding of science and technology has begun to lead to issues in the courtroom
is their own kind. But, with all that has been said, people need to stop committing crimes, then nobody can claim that it was the other group. In the end the question, is the criminal justice system racist? That answer is still debatable. Strong cases can be made on both sides.
The instant we pick up a camera, the image has already been edited and the credibility of the photojournalist is already on the line. The ability and practice of people to be able to edit what goes into the composition of a photograph begins when they pick up a camera and even possibly when they decide to take a photograph of something. The work of a photojournalist is to relay images to the public via news sources in a way that gives people as much information about a topic as possible in the most
... the prosecution is trying to make an example of Dick and Perry. The trial seems lopsided because these men are being portrayed as guilty until proven innocent. There have been a few cases like this in history although the prosecution had more evidence than the latter case. An example includes the OJ Simpson trial only he was found innocent because his lawyers had an effective defense strategy. However, since the defendants Dick and Perry were being tried in a small town, the system was not fair