Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages of nuclear energy
Nuclear power is it beneficial or detrimental
Essay on nuclear energy advantages and disadvantages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages of nuclear energy
Nuclear energy must NOT be used in South Australia.
Nuclear reactions are used to produce heat energy to boil water to produce steam, then steam is used to turn a turbine which turns a generator that produces electricity. The core of the nuclear reactor is fuelled by 1kg Uranium, a highly radioactive element. One kilogram of Uranium is relevant to 1,000,000 kilograms of coal. A huge save.
However, I don’t believe nuclear energy is the answer to powering the lights throughout the nation. Although coal is an irreplaceable substance, I believe Uranium won’t last either. Uranium might last another thirty years, but the damage it has done to the environment is beyond repair.
Firstly, radiation contributes to global warming and cancer in human bodies. Nuclear powering medically dangerous, it sends off radioisotopes such as Iodine 131, Strontium
…show more content…
The trucks needed for transportation uses fossil fuels with added danger that unlike coal, oil or gas. The enriched uranium is radioactive. Can you imagine how destructive it would to have a road accident involving one of these trucks? Unlike oil or coal spill, radioactivity can be carried by wind and rain (Storm water drains).
Now let us examine the Nuclear Reactor. Nuclear reactors are neither cheap nor quick to build and there are a number of different designs to choose from meaning there will be more debate and discussion between the experts and industries. This means there will be more taxes you and I will have to pay.
Yes, of course accidents are unavoidable with nuclear reactors, a meltdown (also known as exposing the core of the nuclear reactor) being the worst possibility. There has been a few of these accidents documented such as the Three Mile Island in the USA, Chernobyl in Ukraine and the Fukushima Plant Japan and each time it’s been said that is would never happen again. This is proof that even scientists are not
What Nuclear power has the ability to do is get a lot of power in a little amount of space. “Roughly 1.6 billion people live without access to electricity, and 2.4 billion rely on traditional biomass because they have no access to modern fuel.” (General Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei) With nuclear power put into these countries that are without power we can have it to where electricity will be accessibility to everyone. By having power accessible to everyone we can accomplish so much more and unlock more possibilities in our world today.
Specific purpose: To persuade the audience that nuclear power is the best source of energy today.
Specific Purpose: To persuade my audience that they should advocate the use of alternative power sources other than nuclear energy.
In conclusion, there are different opinions on the issue of the use of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is only one of many energy options. Nuclear power can decrease pollution to the environment because it does not produce harming gases like other plants do. However, there are also drawbacks that can influences human health by emitting radioactive substances. Thus, all parties should make a deeper research and analysis based on the argument to decide the use of nuclear energy as a safe and cost effective source of energy.
“Face it. Nukes are the most climate-friendly industrial-scale form of energy” (Power, Reiss, Pearlstein, 655). This statement is what I’m trying to promote through my argument. It also ties Inconvenient Truths: 10 Green Heresies by Matt Powers, Spencer Reiss, and Jonanna Pearlstein and Nuclear Power is Best Energy Source: Potchef Stroom together by bring out the main point all authors are trying to get across. Global warming has been a big concern for years now and one of the biggest causes for it, is the burning of fossil fuels to get energy. People that live in the United States of America use a huge amount of energy in their daily lives and that amount continues to grow with our population growing with it. My purpose of this piece is to persuade people to switch to nuclear power for a cleaner energy source because it’s the cleanest energy source.
Nuclear power is the generation of electricity from an atomic reaction. (World Statistics: Nuclear Energy Around the World n.d.) Though it produces zero carbon emissions there has been a decline in support for nuclear power and increased its support for alternative energies in the pursuit for a fossil free energy sector. Factors that have resulted in the reduction of support for nuclear energy include nuclear accidents and waste and the positives of renewable energy which include clean energy, sustainable and reduced health and environmental risks.
Atomic weapons represent an immediate and steady danger to individuals all over. A long way from keeping the peace, they breed dread and doubt among countries. These extreme instruments of dread and mass decimation have no true blue military or key utility and are pointless in tending to any of today's genuine security dangers, for example, psychological warfare, environmental change, outrageous destitution, overpopulation, and sickness. With regards to atomic weapons, there are no sheltered hands. For whatever length of time that any nation has these weapons, others will need them, and the world will be in a problematic state which places us in a condition of hazard at all circumstances.
The US and the world You hear sirens going off you suspect they are just a test for the upcoming weather. Then suddenly you look out your window at 12 pm and its bright as day. You think back to your vote on ending overseas military operations and the nuclear epidemic that has been going on. Sadly this is a possible reality with the power of the atomic bomb.
Radiation and radioactive fallout affect those cells in the body that actively divide (hair, intestine, bone marrow, reproductive organs). Some of the resulting health conditions include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, Cataracts, hair loss and loss of blood cells. These conditions often increase the risk of leukemia, cancer, infertility and birth defects. Nuclear Weapon has the same effects on any type of environment. These weapons destroy and contaminate any place of impact or production.
Turning on your light, making food in the oven, heating and cooling your house all require energy to work. Most likely you have something in your house powered by nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is reliable, sustainable, safe, and doesn’t affect the earth’s air quality. On the other hand, nuclear energy plants are costly, nuclear waste is detrimental to the environment if not taken care of properly, and again the plants can be dangerous as many people recollect on the major accidents at the Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and Fukushima.
The nuclear industry is currently expensive which makes it unattractive to power companies and other big investors. Genoa of the Nuclear Energy Institute said,”What we don’t want do to is be forced to bear the burden of developing this recycling technology before it’s economically feasible.” Financing the first nuclear waste conversion plants will be hard if policies do not change. Legislation can be the first step to bridge the financial gap in the nuclear industry. Policymakers would need to make fast reactors such as PRISM more attractive to power companies.
The use of nuclear power in the mid-1980s was not a popular idea on account of all the fears that it had presented. The public seemed to have rejected it because of the fear of radiation. The Chernobyl accident in the Soviet Union in April of 1986 reinforced the fears, and gave them an international dimension (Cohen 1). Nevertheless, the public has to come to terms that one of the major requirements for sustaining human progress is an adequate source of energy. The current largest sources of energy are the combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas. Fear of radiation may push nuclear power under the carpet but another fear of the unknown is how costly is this going to be? If we as the public have to overcome the fear of radiation and costly project, we first have to understand the details of nuclear energy. The known is a lot less scary then the unknown. If we could put away all the presumptions we have about this new energy source, then maybe we can understand that this would be a good decision for use in the near future.
To begin, nuclear power is produced by nuclear fission, which is the splitting of an atom to start a chain reaction (“11 Facts”). This chain reaction produces massive amounts of heat. Nuclear reactors take advantage of this heat by pumping water into the reactor, which in turn produces steam. The steam then becomes pressurized through a pipeline and exits into a turbine (“How do Nuclear”). The pressurized steam causes the turbine blades to spin, producing power which is linked to a generator for use in the main power lines. When the steam passes the turbine blades, it goes past cooled pipes and condensates (“How do Nuclear”). After the condensation process is finished and the steam reverts back to water, it is pumped into the reactor again, thus completing the process of producing nuclear-based power.
To save words we not go into the basic details of these radiations but these radiations make the radioisotopes our friend or foe. These radiations revolve round the issue of their use and disposal. Interestingly, both use and disposal are issues of concern. Disposal is an issue because the waste is non-biodegradable and the harmful radiations from them could cause cancer and alter genes in the DNA etc. The use of radioactivity is by itself an issue. Is it safe to use? Where shall the nuclear power plant be located? Where will the waste go?
The greatest disadvantages of nuclear energy are the risks posed to mankind and the environment by radioactive materials. ‘On average a nuclear plant annually generates 20 metric tons of used nuclear fuel cla...