Nuclear Energy Persuasive Speech

941 Words2 Pages

Nuclear energy must NOT be used in South Australia.

Nuclear reactions are used to produce heat energy to boil water to produce steam, then steam is used to turn a turbine which turns a generator that produces electricity. The core of the nuclear reactor is fuelled by 1kg Uranium, a highly radioactive element. One kilogram of Uranium is relevant to 1,000,000 kilograms of coal. A huge save.

However, I don’t believe nuclear energy is the answer to powering the lights throughout the nation. Although coal is an irreplaceable substance, I believe Uranium won’t last either. Uranium might last another thirty years, but the damage it has done to the environment is beyond repair.

Firstly, radiation contributes to global warming and cancer in human bodies. Nuclear powering medically dangerous, it sends off radioisotopes such as Iodine 131, Strontium …show more content…

The trucks needed for transportation uses fossil fuels with added danger that unlike coal, oil or gas. The enriched uranium is radioactive. Can you imagine how destructive it would to have a road accident involving one of these trucks? Unlike oil or coal spill, radioactivity can be carried by wind and rain (Storm water drains).

Now let us examine the Nuclear Reactor. Nuclear reactors are neither cheap nor quick to build and there are a number of different designs to choose from meaning there will be more debate and discussion between the experts and industries. This means there will be more taxes you and I will have to pay.

Yes, of course accidents are unavoidable with nuclear reactors, a meltdown (also known as exposing the core of the nuclear reactor) being the worst possibility. There has been a few of these accidents documented such as the Three Mile Island in the USA, Chernobyl in Ukraine and the Fukushima Plant Japan and each time it’s been said that is would never happen again. This is proof that even scientists are not

Open Document