Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment

Back in 2013 Spring Semester, I was in a team of four students in English 302 class. The assignment was a semester long, where the teams were to create a fictional company and sell the idea to the Professor and classmates. The professor wanted the students to utilize each and everyone’s majors to come up with the final product like how many businesses and corporations actually do. When we first had our initial meeting, everyone introduced themselves and their majors then shared contact numbers and email addresses. With that, we divided the works that was necessary to finish the project.

Being an IT major with many background history of using Photoshop and Illustration, I was responsible for creating our business websites, logos, designing company building, pamphlets for final presentation, and business cards. Second team mate was an Accounting major, so she was responsible for doing research on finding out the costs of buying a lands to build our company and costs of building materials. Then, third team mate was a Criminology major and he was responsible for researching and creating

However, in a different team that I worked with, we would give the particular person a chance to catch up, however after certain point, we had to talk to professor and let them know. Then, we just carried on to our projects as if we were one person short. However, Lejk et al (1996), he had an example similar to my approach. Where group will approach the tutor of freeloader where then, that person will be given a yellow card. Then will agree to enhance the performance by an agreed time. Even then, when the individual fails to improve, the individual will receive 20% reduction from the group grade. If there are no improvements, then a red card is awarded. Which leads individual to the dismissal from team, and any work that freeloader was responsible for is removed from group’s workload. (Lejk et al,