Robert Nozicks thought experiment which he called The Experience Machine is arguably the most well-known argument against ethical hedonism. In The Experience Machine, Nozick argues that ethical hedonism at its base is a flawed moral theory because humans intrinsically have more needs and wants beyond that of pleasure. He uses the ‘experience machine’ to show that this point of view is not valid; if it were then we would have an overwhelming drive to ‘plug in’ which we do not. I agree with Nozicks objection to hedonism and believe that the three rejections he provides are an accurate assumption of human behavior.
Hedonism is the pursuit of pleasure; “the belief that pleasure or happiness is the most important goal in life” (Marriam-Webster).
…show more content…
“Thought experiments are devices of the imagination used to investigate the nature of things…” (Brown). Nozick’s ‘experience machine’ “…feeds sensations and impressions into people’s brains. When people are plugged into the machine, they can experience anything they want and are blissfully unaware that the experiences are not genuine” (Jortner). Nozick uses the ‘experience machine’ as an argument against hedonism and believes that most people, given the chance to ‘plug in’ would choose not to. If pleasure was the only intrinsic value, we would all plug into the experience machine without hesitation, however, not all of us want to. He considers this evidence that there are other elements we strive for other than pleasure and which pleasure may even be sacrificed …show more content…
There is no actual contact with any deeper reality, though the experience of it can be simulated’ (Nozick 142). A large portion of what makes us who are is what we do and our reactions to situations and unforeseen events. “Those in the experience machine don’t do anything. They make no choices and perform no actions…They are neither virtuous nor vicious because they have never done anything for which they can be held responsible” (Irwin). Nozick also discusses the idea of a ‘transformative machine’ that can transform us into any type of person we want to be. The machine(s) effectively take away our ability to have a personality or to ‘find ourselves’ so to speak by doing everything for us. There is no effort involved in being ‘plugged in’ and thus any benefit from it would be
Frederick, Shane. “Hedonic Treadmill.” Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Ed. Roy F. Baumeister, and Kathleen D. Vohs. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2007. SAGE knowledge. Web. 8 July 2014.
Hedonism is a theory of morality. There are several popular philosophers who support hedonism; some of whom offer their own interpretation of the theory. This paper will focus on the Epicurean view. Epicurus, a Greek philosophers born in 341 B.C., generated a significant measure of controversy amongst laymen and philosophical circles in regards to his view of the good life. Philosophers whom teachings predate Epicurus’ tended to focus on the question of “How can human beings live a good, morally sound, life?” Epicurus ruffled feathers and ultimately expanded the scope of philosophy by asking “What makes people happy?”
The word hedonism originates from the Greek name for pleasure. In chapter 1 of The Fundamentals of Ethics, Shafer-Landau defines hedonism as the view that "there is only one thing that is intrinsically good for us: happiness. Everything else improves our lives only to the extent that it makes us happy" (25). Enjoyment is said to be the key to a good life. Throughout the chapter, he goes on to list the most important reasons for hedonism's popularity.
As humans we are constantly in search of understanding the balance between what feels good and what is right. Humans try to take full advantage of experiencing pleasure to its fullest potential. Hedonism claims that pleasure is the highest and only source of essential significance. If the notion of hedonism is truthful, happiness is directly correlated with pleasure. Robert Nozick presented the philosophical world with his though experiment, “The Experience Machine” in order to dispute the existence and validity of hedonism. Nozick’s thought experiment poses the question of whether or not humans would plug into a machine which produces any desired experience. Nozick weakens the notion of hedonism through his thought experiment, claiming humans need more than just pleasure in their lives. Nozick discovers that humans would not hook up to this machine because they would not fully develop as a person and consider it a form of suicide.
The philosophical text “The Best Things in Life: A Guide to What Really Matters”, by Thomas Hurka illustrates the three key aspects of a good life and well-being; ethical hedonism, desire satisfaction, and objectivism. Ethical hedonism describes how something is intrinsically good for you if it’s a state of pleasure, your well-being improves when you experience pleasure. Desire satisfaction defines how something is intrinsically good for you if you intrinsically desire it, your well-being improves when you satisfy an intrinsic desire. Objectivism is about how some things are intrinsically good for you independently of any desire you may have or any pleasure you may get, your well-being improves when you acquire those things. Hurka believes that the best things in life are knowledge, achievement, pleasure,
This unit explored desire satisfactionism, a term that generally speaks for itself. Though it is an umbrella term because there are different types. There is local desire satisfactionism, which is the idea that if desires are satisfied, one is happy. Then there is whole life satisfactionism. It means that to be happy is to have one desire satisfied. This is the overarching desire that your most important desires be satisfied. It is prioritized assessment of one’s life as a whole. To compare local desire satisfactionism with whole life satisfactionism would be like comparing quality and quantity from a hedonist perspective. It is similar in regard to desire satisfactionism, two different types. Several individuals discuss whole life satisfactionism
Epicurus was admittedly a Hedonist, and this philosophy has had a huge influence on his work. Especially so on his death argument. Hedonism is, “the doctrine that pleasure is the only thing that is good in itself for a person, pain the only thing that is bad in itself for a person.”
Hedonism means to live only for pleasure. It means not thinking about the consequences of your actions as long as make you happy. It’s a total abandon of all responsibilities. This type of lifestyle often has negative results. I mean, look at the hippies, and how their hedonistic society turned out. They are all either in rehab centers or have kids running around with names like “Moonbeam” and “Starchild”. But enough hippie bashing - let’s look at how the Hedonistic way of life is integrated into The Great Gatsby. Let’s take the parties for example. Gatsby has a party just about every week, no matter what. He has tons of people come over, and they party all night. Gatsby has tons of booze at his parties, and no one thinks of consuming anything but alcohol.
Instead, it suggests that things such as living an autonomous life, engaging in the real world, and truth, are more valuable. Nozick claims that once we imagine an experience machine, we consider the idea of exiting within one – being submersed into a fluid filled tank with electrodes plugged into our nervous systems – repellent (NOZICK Singer& *259). The Matrix visually displays Nozick's position brilliantly. When the film brings us face to face with the machinery of the actual Matrix, we see hairless, pale, slimy humans, submerged in goo, with cables protruding from their bodies. This imagery evokes repugnance, and it is likely that viewers will feel disgust at the very thought of an experience machine existence. Furthermore, the likelihood of us dismissing the experience machine in favour of reality is increased through the character of the main protagonist, Neo, who we see as principled, genuine, and someone who values truth, even at the risk of loosing pleasure, which is shown in the 'red/blue pill' scene. In this scene it is made clear that if Neo opts out of the experience machine existence to confront reality, there is no promise for anything other than truth. In Neo choosing to unplug from the Matrix, we see someone virtuous and strong, traits which are generally viewed as positive. Thus, Neo serves as the embodiment of the assertion that pleasure is not what we hold to be of ultimate value, and we come to associate his positive character with the objection against
Nozick‘s experience machine creates experiences based on selections made by human beings themselves for their own individual. Every two years they are required to make this selection whilst feeling some distress (in reality they exist in a floating tank). Then they submerge into a fake world for another two years and so on (Timmons, 122-123). He believes that rational humans would choose not to plug into the experience machine because they would want the actual experience of life instead of a virtual existence. It is a shallow reality that they are provided which will not satisfy them for long. Especially because it does not allow them to develop their own person, or personality, it strips away their human qualities and turns each of them into an “indeterminate blob” (Timmons, 123). In fact, this is a man-made world that provides nothing but a selection of experiences to choose from, it is not an actual experience an individual can have. It is ...
Most people think that the highest end is a life of pleasure. Hedonists have defined happiness as " an equivalent to the totality of pleasurable or agreeable feeling.';(Fox, 3) Some pleasures are good and contribute to happiness. Not all ends are ultimate ends but the highest end would have to be something ultimate; the only conceivable ultimate end is happiness.
Pleasure is a source of enjoyment or delight, as described by dictionary.com. Hedonism is the pursuit of or devotion to pleasure, especially to the pleasures of the senses. Your view of pleasure clearly depends on which time period you are living in, talking about, and what you believe. For example if you lived when Epicurus lived you might believe that pain and pleasure are two different things, but if you live now and listen to Queen you might believe that pain and pleasure are not completely different things.
A moral theory should be one’s guide when deciding whether an action is either good or bad, wrong or right. There are many types of moral theories to choose from, but we will only focus on two: utilitarianism and ancient hedonism. These theories meet in their pursuit of something greater, for hedonism it’s personal pleasure while for utilitarianism it is happiness for the greater number of people. In this work, the differences and the similarities of utilitarianism and hedonism will be pointed out after explaining them separately.
Suppose one was to record their pleasures down on paper using a graph. At first, one might be confused as to how to go about quantifying their happiness. After consideration of the quality of ones varying pleasures though, one is more able to deduce whether it is a higher or a lower pleasure and graph them. This enables one to distinguish which things promote the greatest pleasure, which translates itself to strive for happiness. For example, consider the attainment of food or sex in contrast to mental and spiritual growth. When one is only interested in satiating their appetite for food or sex, the pleasure acquired is minuscule when compared to the acquisition of mental and spiritual growth. Thus, attaining mental and spiritual growth will bring o...