A revolution is the replacement of a government by a different one. The idea of revolution has been around since the first kingdoms were found. However, the idea was not as developed until the enlightenment. John Locke, one of the greatest philosophers of all time came up with the idea that if a government does not function properly, people can rebel and form a new government. About two hundred years after John Locke, a man named Pierre-Joseph Proudhon officially published the idea in French. This thought has been the roots to all revolutions before and after Locke’s existence. A revolution is not less than a civil war. It builds on the blood of martyrs and usually does not stop until it overthrows the old regime. The basic idea is to sacrifice one or two generations for the possibility that their sons and daughters would live in comfort. Sometimes, everything ends successfully and sometimes a new dictatorship rises. The basic steps of a revolution are rebellion, overthrow of the current government, and installing the new revolutionary government. An uprising is always the last option considered by wise men because in the best scenario, the new government would provide freedom and justice for people and in the worst scenario it would bring complete devastation. The success of a revolution is not always guaranteed. The only thing that would happen for sure is bloodshed. By starting an uprising, different groups with different ideas emerge and this can lead up to a civil war. About thirty-five years ago, in 1979, a massive uprising lead by Ruhollah Khomeini started in Iran. Ruhollah Khomeini rebelled against the monarchy of Iran to bring freedom for his people through Islam.
These natural rights included to life, liberty and property; revolutionaries believed that the government should protect these rights for the individual. After the Revolution as the government was being formed, the government did protect these rights for the individual if they were white males. African American men and women were not granted these rights and protection. African American men and women were aware that the Revolution was unjustly not granting them there natural rights: In a letter to Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Banneker uses religious arguments to try to reason with Jefferson and show him that black and whites are the same and should be treated the same natural rights (Benjamin Banneker and Thomas Jefferson Letters). Jefferson does reply saying that he believes that slavery should change, but he is very dismissive and only replies to be polite. This response by Jefferson proves that the rights given to white American and not African Americans is know and prevalent to both parties. Jefferson show the prejudice shown to African Americans even after a fight for
The American Revolution, 1765-1783, became the model for other revolutions to come. Americans did this by denouncing the King of Great Britain and hereditary nobility, while substituting the Declaration of Independence in 1776. The Declaration of Independence granted all men the natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Liberty provided men (slaves and women
The colonists attitude about rights is illustrated in the statement “We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Ellis 15). These words, taken from the Declaration of Independence, are the most influential in our country’s political culture, even today. This document was drafted by Thomas Jefferson in 1776. Today, it is read and analyzed constantly in not just America, but all over the world as well. Granted, it was based on gaining Independence from the British Crown’s rule, but its contents still holds true even today. It gives strength to the “underdog” in society to know even his government believes he is created equal. It puts fear into the soul of any to-be tyrant, letting him know—we will not stand back and allow you to bully us. It also makes it quite clear that if the people do not find solace in the government, if they are bullied and persecuted consistently by this government, then they have the right to overthrow the oppressors and again, start ane...
History has always been the study of causes and effects. The things that have the biggest impact on how society turn out are war and agreements made that follow the wars. The most important document for the United States is the Declaration of Independence. Its no secret that Thomas Jefferson was responsible for drafting the declaration but not all the ideas were his. John Locke’s Second Treatise on Government is what contained many of the ideas found in the declaration, they were just tweaked during the final draft. The Declaration of Independence both lay out the reasons for having a rebellion against a corrupt government, along with laying the foundation for the concept of law.
In his Second Treatise of Government, Locke proposes an idealized state of nature in which men are self-sufficient and content. The implications of his idealized population lead him to derive the existence of government from its own theoretical roots: Locke proposes government as a naturally occurring consequence of his state of nature. This derivation is founded on the injustice of man in his natural state: it is the imperfections found in the state of nature that necessitate government. This paper aims to show why the inequality caused by the existence of a market economy is an intentional and necessary path from Locke’s state of nature to the existence of the commonwealth. It will first argue that unequal possession is an inevitable consequence of property as defined by Locke. It will then show why this inequality is a necessary transition out of the state of nature for mankind. It will finally argue that each man’s consent to currency, and the injustice it brings, is the foundation for the overall consent to the commonwealth. The existence of inequality is naturally introduced and maintained throughout Locke’s argument. Hobbes successfully defends that economic inequality is both a natural and crucial part of political society; both the inequality of human ability and the resulting economic inequality precede the existence of an ideal state.
The American Revolution was the result of a series of social, political, and intellectual transformations in early American society and government. The patriots who fought the in the Revolution War of 1775 did so in the name of preserving traditional rights of Englishmen, especially the right of "no taxation without representation"; they increasingly opposed attempts b...
Since propositions of rights are a pervasive and contested feature of our political practice, the question of what they should be taken to mean is a central problem for political theory. Whether we hold them to be self-evident truths, or nonsense, or fictions, or something else, we cannot avoid taking some view of their sense if we are to give an adequate account or critique of our political principles and institutions.
If a population is to exist then all of those that participate in the functioning of the society must be willing to give up some of their natural rights in order to follow the laws created to allow the society as a whole to greater protect the people, and the propert...
The potential reach of my argument needs to be specified at the outset by clarifying the sense in which I will be using certain terms. To begin, I will define legitimate political authority as, “a right to rule (Raz 1985, p. 3),” and this definition illustrates that the authority is legitimate based on the fact that the despot is not just accepted because they want the authority and power, but because they have a right to be the authority. With this definition, the despot has the right to rule, so the citizens are obligated to obey, which is described from the consent theories, which were originally proposed by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau to characterize the nature of the relationship between the ruler and the ruled. In this context, I define the ...
The character of the United States is illuminated by the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson wanted to build a government where people are free and where the government “derives its power from the consent of the governed and it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it” (Jefferson, 247). T...
it is their very incapacity that brings us in” meaning people do not earn human rights via revolution, reform, or through any other means, but rather they are inherent to all humans, whereas sovereignty acts merely as a tool which allows a government to have rule over its citizens. When we take into account the fact that the government of the nation committing the rights abuses uses sovereignty as an instrument to contradict its purpose, it becomes obvious that we can no longer find value in it, however human rights are always of value, and always an end we are obligated to strive for. A global obligation to protect the rights of all humans exists, and in situations such as the one at hand choosing not to act equates to allowing the injustice to
From these observations it appears, that in forming a government on its true principles, the foundation should be laid in the manner I before stated, by expressly reserving to the people such of their essential rights as are not necessary to be parted
John Locke and René Descartes were both early seventeenth century philosophers striving to explain or answer the great questions of their time. What is the mind or self and how does it relate to the brain? How can we gain knowledge? Are we the same person we were several years ago? These two great philosophers had similar and conflicting views on these various questions of life. Locke was influenced by his readings of Descartes and adopted some of his philosophical terminology and thought. Considering this influence they still present different philosophies. These different philosophies stem from the two original schools of thought in epistemology; the study of knowledge.
Enlightenment philosophy strongly influenced his ideas and beliefs; two of the most prominent being his view on African slavery and American freedom. He accused King George III of imposing illegal control over Virginia’s political decisions, including its desire to restrict or outlaw slavery. By doing this he was able to open the colonists’ eyes and bring about a rationale for slavery. Although this idea did not become completely relevant until after the Declaration of Independence, it sparked a major event in American History and shaped America’s social