North Korea Has No Ambition for Nuclear Proliferation

1451 Words6 Pages
There has been an increase in the support of taking forceful actions towards North Korea which has seemed to be unpredictable in its steps and decision taken especially in terms of security. It has maintained its stand on the nuclear arsenal and other programs associated to it, creating a threat to the security of the whole region and the whole in general (Kim, 2002 pg.6). It has also refused to involve itself in any form of negotiation making the other nations abandon further negotiations and are determined to take some forceful action against it. I greatly disagree with the stand of forceful cause of action being taken against North Korea and the withdrawal of any further talks. The involvement of the North Korea in the nuclear plan and program will not be a threat to the other international nations. According to my argument I will be based on the support of North Korea’s nuclear proliferation and how it imposes no threat to the other nations by this. These nations that pushed for forceful actions taken against North Korea and abandonment of further negations and talks with it advocated for North Korea’s denuclearization. It was the October 9 2006 North Korea’s nuclear test, actually the first, that triggered the various reactions and actions from the international nations. USA led these nations in trying to strongly control the North Korea nuclear program. This test has also forced them to scramble to find suitable solutions sanctions that suites them. This action by international nations creates room for discussions and various arguments as to why so many nations are after the denuclearization program and what their intentions might be especially when thought of from an economical point of view. Despite the actions of North... ... middle of paper ... ...From the above arguments I clearly disagree with the situation of North Korea being viewed as a threat to international nations and entire world due to its nuclear weapon proliferation. There should be no forceful force of action taken against it for its in the right track of proliferation and its motives can be clearly seen. Works Cited Haggard, S.M. 2007. Famine in North Korea: Markets, Aid, and Reform. New York: Columbia University Press. Park, K.A. 2013. North Korea in Transition: Politics, Economy, and Society. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Kim, S.S.2002. North Korea and Northeast Asia. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Yoshihara, T., and James R. H. 2012.Strategy in the Second Nuclear Age: Power, Ambition, and the Ultimate Weapon. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Open Document