North And South Comparison

611 Words2 Pages

North And South Comparison In the years before the Civil War, tensions between the North and South were growing. The Southern states (Louisiana, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, etc.) were slave states. The Northern states (Maine, Indiana, New Jersey, Vermont, etc.) were opposed to slavery. Not only were the political views of the North and South different, the climate/geography, economy, and population also shared differences. If you lived in the North during the 1800’s, you would expect weather typical to that of Indiana. The winters are cold and and the summers are hot. There is a short growing season of around six or seven months. Even though the growing season does not last year-round, the North is full of natural resources. These resources include timber, iron, and a variety of crops. The geography in the North consists of vast forests, large plains, and coastline. This coastline is located across the Northeastern region. Most cities in the North developed along rivers, which allowed for easier trade routes. Lastly, many plains and fields are located in this region. Staple crops such as beans and corn are harvested in the fields after the growing season. On the other hand, the South was subject to long, hot summers with mild winters. The summers were also humid and rainy. The temperatures in the …show more content…

Irish, German, and European immigrants accounted for a large number of the North’s population. The population in the South included Americans, European immigrants, and slaves. Georgia, Tennessee, and Virginia accounted for most of the Southern population. One third of this population being slaves. One fourth of all Southern farmers owned slaves. The main reason that the Northern population was larger is because there was more agriculture and industrial improvement. Citizens came to the North to find jobs and to make more money for their

Open Document