preview

Noise Reduction In Hearing Aids

argumentative Essay
2408 words
2408 words
bookmark

Recently in a local hearing clinic, a client’s concerns were discussed. “I’m afraid I won’t like them. My brother in law bought two hearing aids, and he keeps them in a drawer in the kitchen.” While the number of people dissatisfied with their hearing aids hovers around 50%, the hearing aid industry is hard pressed to decrease the number of returns, and increase the average daily use of each aid. In order to accomplish this, hearing aid manufacturers must answer the most often heard complaint: “It doesn’t work well in noise.”
Unfortunately, a hearing aid will never be able to accomplish the sifting and sorting that is carried out in the human brain. While a person with normal hearing sits in a restaurant, he can distinguish a conversational speech signal that is as little as three decibels greater than the ambient noise. On the other hand, a person with a 30-decibel sensorineural loss might need the speech signal to be 15 or more decibels greater than the ambient noise. The hearing aid’s task is to acoustically or electronically compensate for both the neurological shortcomings of the hearing impaired person and the wide band increase inherent in any basic amplifier.
Acoustic compensation can be carried out in a hearing aid microphone. Most hearing aids today utilize omnidirectional microphones, which pick up sound equally from all directions. This may be beneficial and practical in some cases, as in the completely in the canal (CIC) aid. The CIC aid uses the natural funneling of the auricle in order to focus sound directly into the instrument. Behind-the-ear (BTE) and full concha in-the-ear (ITE) aids lose this anatomical feature, and may benefit from a directional microphone. “The purpose of using a directional microphone is to focus its sensitivity toward the front of the listener, thereby attenuating or reducing unwanted “noise” or competition emanating from behind the listener.” (Stach 1998)
Microphone directionality can be accomplished by using a single microphone with two sound inlets. In this mechanical method, the time lag created by a sound entering each inlet is precisely calibrated to cancel out sounds from the sides and back of the microphone as they strike the diaphragm. The Phonak MicroZoom uses an electronic approach. Each MicroZoom contains two omnidirectional microphones. According to the flyer, “One picks up sound in front of you while a second picks up sound from the sides and rear.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that the hearing aid industry is hard pressed to decrease the number of returns, and increase the average daily use of each aid.
  • Explains that a hearing aid will never be able to accomplish the sifting and sorting that is carried out in the human brain.
  • Explains that most hearing aids today utilize omnidirectional microphones, which pick up sound equally from all directions.
  • Describes how the phonak microzoom uses an electronic approach to achieve microphone directionality by using a single microphone with two sound inlets.
  • Argues that directional microphone technology is fallible in one regard: it assumes that all "noise" is spatially related. however, much of the noise present in our environment is omnidirectional.
  • Explains that digital signal processing (dsp) is partly utilized in amplification in order to narrow the focus from "all" sounds to "speech".
  • Explains that an ldfr hearing aid incorporates bill (bass increase at low levels) circuitry to reduce noise and improve speech discrimination performance.
  • Explains that while it is reasonable to assume that bill circuitry would be beneficial in the presence of low frequency noise, there is no evidence that listeners with hearing loss exhibit upward spread of masking.
  • Compares till processing with the k-amp&#61668, which reduces loudness discomfort associated with high-frequency sounds.
  • Compares bill and till hearing aids, stating that both algorithms provide significant high frequency gain at low levels.
  • Explains that the bill and till hearing aids are both effective with varying types of hearing losses, but noise perception can be changed by changing the frequency response of an amplifier.
  • Explains that a pill circuit gives the clinician more options when adjusting for both noise, and sound quality.
  • Describes spindel's "magnetic" hearing aid, which uses an implanted electromagnet to enhance hearing, reduce background noise, and eliminate feedback.
  • Explains that the magnetic aid consists of a microphone, processing unit and electromagnetic coil, all of which are implanted. combining both signals in phase will have the constructive effect of directly increasing the amplitude of the wave travelling over the basilar membrane.
  • Explains that the device generates a sound wave that is out of phase with the incoming signal. the elimination of feedback is another substantial gain of this type of aid.
  • Explains that although the system is currently being tested on animals with favorable results, human testing will be necessary. the magnetic aid allows for an adjustable frequency / intensity analyzer to be implanted in the skull.
  • Concludes that the advantage of noise reduction techniques in hearing aids is directly related to a reduction in listening aid complaints, and an increase in client satisfaction.
  • Explains that automatic signal processing in hearing aids is also a valuable advantage for noise reduction.
  • Explains that the magnetic hearing aid offers promises of exquisite noise reduction capability. the implantable processor analyzes sounds and isolates speech based on a user's configurations.
Get Access