Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
impacts of WW1 on literature
the attitudes british poets had towards the war
essay on first world war poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: impacts of WW1 on literature
Poetry is a way of expression. People of all ages, backgrounds, and time periods connect by using poetry as a way to voice their opinions. During World War One, a time of trench warfare and harsh conditions, many soldiers used poetry to release their fears and talk about their opinions. Rupert Brooke was a poet from World War One, and his views on the war were very different from the views of most soldiers. Rupert’s service in England’s navy didn’t last long, he had only experience combat once, and he contracted a blood disease shortly after that. Although he saw little of the war, he is still considered a war poet. While some people see his poetry as patriotic, others believe that Rupert’s poetry is too idealistic. Rupert’s poems “Dead” and “The Soldier” are prime examples of his views on the war; both of the poems explain that Rupert believes that soldiers should feel proud to die for their country, and that dying in war is not dying in vain.
Rupert Brooke’s poem “Dead” explains Rupert’s view on the pride of dying for one’s country in his use of form, tone, imagery, symbolism, rhyme scheme, and personification. The title, “Dead”, sets the tone for the narrator, gloomy and upsetting, but since the poem is a sonnet, it holds a slightly romantic mood. Brooke quickly covers his view on fallen soldiers in his first line: “Blow out, you bugles; over the rich Dead!” (1) where he uses the word “rich” to express how he thinks dying in the war is honorable. The alliteration in the first line focuses on the hard “b” and it can be used to symbolize the loud bangs of a gun. He talks of death as if it makes a person an asset or a “rarer [gift] than gold” (Brooke 3). Like the words “rarer” and “gold” in line three, Rupert uses more words wi...
... middle of paper ...
...ith positive connotations like “happy” (Brooke 12) and “peace” (Brooke 13) to show that he believes his life after death will be filled with joy and happiness. He once again talks of England as if it was a mother, and using the happiness he associates with her to convey his perfect heaven.
In both of Rupert’s poems he focuses on the glory of a righteous death by using form, tone, imagery, rhyme scheme, and personification. But, the two have one main difference, audience. In “Dead” the narrator, a soldier, is talking to other soldiers and telling them that the nobility of their deaths make their lives immortal. In “The Soldier” the narrator, a soldier, is talking to mourners and reassuring them, and himself, of his death for his country. Overall, the two poems convey a similar message: that Rupert Brooke believes that a death in battle is a death to take pride in.
War as seen through the eyes of Ambrose Bierce in An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge depicts it as truly gritty. The author successfully sends a message of how death is a part of war, and it is not as noble or glorious as one would think it is. Due to popular media, we have this attitude that the protagonist is going to go down in a blaze of glory, and while it may be true for some, it is not like that for everyone. War is rough, dark, and gritty but no one ever wants to talk about those parts of war because it would ruin the fantasy of it.
Wilfred Owen expresses his feelings about war in “Anthem for a Doomed Youth”, which revolves around the events that took place in World War I. Throughout the sonnet, the speaker talks bitterly about modern warfare, noting the harsh sounds of war and questioning the treatment of the soldiers that perish. In the octave, the speaker wonders what can be done to honor the soldiers that died, but realizes negatively that the soldiers only receive death instead of ceremonies. In the sestet, the speaker expands upon this idea of a proper ceremony for the deceased soldiers, saying that the families must be the ones to properly honor their dead. Owen’s use of the Petrarchan sonnet with a Shakespearean rhyme scheme, helps him express his frustration about war and its subsequent treatment of the dead.
Throughout the history of war poetry, no aspect of war can be said to feature more prominently than the representation of death and dying. While such representations are constant in their inclusion in war texts, the nature of the representation varies greatly, be it as a noble act for ones country, or as the defining negative of war. Poems such as Brooke’s ‘The Soldier’ and Seaman’s ‘Pro Patria’ are strong examples of the former; while others such as ‘Dolce et decorum est’ by Owen and ‘The Rear Guard’ by Sassoon best exemplify the latter. The question remains however as to why these representations of death and dying differ so, and whether there is a relevant relationship between the type of depiction and the time period or conflict, as well as the author’s proximity to death’s harsh reality.
Since the British during this time believed that they had “refined taste”, there was very little use of explicit words, but instead proper words. However, “During and after World War I, flowery Victorian language was blown apart and replaced by more sinewy and R-rated prose styles.” (articles.latimes.com) In order for poets like Owen and Sasoon to convey their message, they had to use precise, candid language. There refused to soften their language in order to lessen the blow of the meaning of their poems. Sasoon described the English soldiers as “damned” and speaks of the “stenches” in the battlefield. Owens vividly describes soldiers in “Mental Cases” whose “baring teeth… leer like skulls’ teeth wicked,” and how “the sun seems a blood smear” and night becomes blood-black.” (poemhunter.com) Words like damned, leer, blood-black, stenches, and etcetera intensely describe the soldiers’
In this poem written by Owen, the events of a typical day in the war is detailed and described to show that war is not as glorious and honorable as those back home picture it. The title, meaning 'how sweet and fitting it is to die for one's country', is actually very sarcastic and depicts the feelings of many of those that were fighting. The first stanza sets the scene and show what the soldiers would be feeling at the time. The men's condition at the time was so wretched th...
In conclusion, depending on the position from which one views war, the standpoint may vary ranging from being supportive of the soldiers because those who die are dying for the country or they are completely unsupportive of war activities because it is a brutal and gruesome experience involving countless unnecessary injuries and deaths. Affected by a number of factors, the authors of the two poems have chosen opposing standpoints on the issue of war where Tennyson glorified it with the main message that it is an honour to die for one's country whereas the other, Owen suppresses the idea of war by illustrating all the horrid experiences of a soldier.
I am going to compare and contrast the two poems ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen and ‘War Photographer’ by Carol Ann Duffy. They both give a view of war. Owen gives first hand experiences he witnessed whilst fighting in World War One and where he unfortunately died one week before the war came to an end. Carol Ann Duffy may be writing about the feelings of her personal friends who were war photographers, showing some of the horrors they witnessed.
In the poems “Dulce et Decorum Est” written by Wilfred Owen and “The Death of the Ball Turret Gunner” written by Randall Jarrell, which both touch on the issues of war. In these two poems the Speaker uses imagery, diction, and sorrow to show how brutal the war was. They both convey the horror and futility of dying for a state. “Death of the Ball Turret Gunner” (Randall Jarrell 1945) and “Dulce et Decorum Est” (Wilfred Owen 1920) examine the impact war has on the soldiers who fight them.
The title ‘Anthem of Doomed Youth’, is juxtaposed to its real meaning of anthem being something to celebrate and be proud of. The assonance between the ‘Doomed’ and collective noun ‘Youth’ can come as a shock to society as topic of death and youth do not go together. In other words, the soldiers are too young and are already fated to death by enlisting in the war. This highlights how war is cruel as the soldiers are stolen of their youth, entering a battlefield designed to ‘sapt the soldier 's spirit.’ Furthermore, Owen shows that the fallen soldiers themselves will not get a proper burial of “candles,” “pall,” nor “flowers.” Instead, these are substituted with negative imagery “The pallor of girls’ brows” and personification “patient minds” to demonstrate that the thoughts of the ones waiting for the fallen soldiers back home are the closest thing they will have to a funeral. This is epitomised in the personification “bugles calling them from sad shires,” which conveys a nation in mourning back home. Collectively, these poetic devices in “Anthem for the Doomed Youth” shows that the death of the young soldiers negatively affects the people around
In "The Soldier", Brooke's firm patriotism towards England is shown through two different points of view--the octet illustrating what will happen when he dies in battle and the sestet describing the afterlife. He believes that if he should be remembered for anything, it would be that he is English. He even goes as far as stating that "In that rich earth a richer dust concealed," meaning that if he were to die on a foreign land, its soil would be made better because a piece of England would be buried along with him. The entire poem glorifies England as Brooke incorporates it into a sonnet, includes various forms of imagery, and also develops his admiration towards his country by describing it through positive connotation.
Fighting and dying in war can sometimes be seen as an honor, but during actual battles, there is a horrific, scary side of war. Both “The Charge of the Light Brigade” written by Alfred Lord Tennyson and “Dulce et Decorum Est” written by Wilfred Owen reflect on warfare, yet the authors’ conclusions about death during war are different. Tone, imagery, and point of view in the poems are dissimilar to display the contrasting conclusions. In the first poem, Tennyson develops a tone of reverence from a third person point of view in order to convey the idea that one should honor the heroism of soldiers, while in the second poem, Owen employs graphic imagery from first person point of view in order to covey the idea that dying in battle is not honorable or heroic.
Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity. Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
“The Soldier” written by Rupert Brooke in 1914 is a pro-war poem to express the bravery of soldiers going to war and fighting for their nation. Brooke's poems use of extended metaphors “Earth a richer dust.” Is used to explain that when a brave soldier dies the ground will forever hold its value. This allows him to convey his message of bravery by fighting for your nation because the earth will forever be grateful of your brave actions. He also uses personification “A dust who England bore, shaped aware,” To compare England to a mother as it gave life to the soldier and molded the
is an honor to die. The poet in the Into Battle talks about life in a
The poem comprises three stanzas which are patterned in two halves; the rule of three is ingeniously used throughout the poem to create tension and show the progression of the soldiers’ lives. There is a variety of rhyming schemes used – possibly Duffy considered using caesural rhyme, internal rhyme and irregular rhyme to better address the elegiac reality. The rhythm is very powerful and shows Duffy’s technical adroitness. It is slightly disconcerting, and adds to the other worldly ambience of the poem. Duffy uses a powerful comparative in each stanza to exemplify the monstrosity and extent of war, which is much worse than we imagine; it develops throughout each stanza, starting with a syntactical ‘No; worse.’ to ‘worse by far’ and ending on ‘much worse’. Similarly, the verbs used to describe the soldier’s shadow as he falls shows the reader the journey of the shadow, as if it’s the trajectory of soldiers’ lives. At first, the shadow is as an act...