No Paid Interview Summary

643 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 2018 annotated bibliography college athletes getting paid

This interview took place in New York, New York from the CNN television station and aired March 20, 2014. Newt Gingrich and Van Jones, anchors of CNN Sports News conducted this interview to explore the opinion of a professional and legendary basketball player on his stance of paying collegiate athletes. The interviewee, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, retired center for the Milwaukee Bucks and Los Angeles Lakers addresses the “the fact that the athletes are responsible for generating incredible amounts of revenue” (Abdul-Jabbar) as well as how college events such as March Madness generate millions of dollars off of said athletes, yet are not beneficiaries (Abdul-Jabbar). Interviewer Jones identifies the “issues that could arise with all athletes wanting …show more content…

This review is a breakdown of grossing annual revenues of “NCAA’s staff upwards of 100 million dollars per year” (Edelman 1) and how the NCAA’s rules deprive their members of the chance to share their wealth with the student-athletes. This article explains why the NCAA’s “no-pay” rules violate section 1 of the Sherman Act (Edelman). Professor Edelman, Associate Professor of Law at the Zicklin School of Business, deconstructs how “economic liberty, illegal wage-fixing, and suspicious court decisions with the NCAA” (Edelman 4) shaped the damage done to collegiate athletes under the Sherman Act. This information pertains to my research in uncovering not only the ethical, but also the legal disservice to these student athletes by with holding financial compensation for their time and …show more content…

After recent research, in spring of 2015 Brynlee Forik Ph.D., Department Head of Human Development and Adolescent Studies at Western Kentucky University uncovers economic downfalls popularly overlooked by the emotionally invested parties. Topics revealed include the investment in student-athletes by the NCAA’s “use of laundry money as a solution proposed by advocators for pay-for-play, and barriers for the moving forward of implementing pay-for-play” (Forik 2). Ultimately, the understanding of the NCAA and pay-for-play adversaries realized this notion would “restructure the mission statement of the student-athlete and threaten what college athletics was all about, education” (Forik 6). Information in this article provided by Forik aids in channeling the practicality of the pay-for-play concept and informs readers on how what may appear as the “right thing to do” may not benefit students nor staff in the

Show More
Related

  • Structured Interview For Legislative Aide

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    5 – High Apologize, put the customer at ease, tell him you are here to help him and ask him to explain his concern to find a possible solution.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography: Should College Athletes Be Paid?

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    Those who play popular and highly competitive college sports are treated unfairly. The colleges and universities with successful sports like football and basketball receive millions of dollars in television and ad space revenues, so do the National Collegiate Athletic Association, which is the governing body of big time college sports. Many coaches are also paid over $1 million per year. Meanwhile, the players that help the colleges receive these millions of dollars are forbidden to receive any gifts or money for their athletic achievements and performances. As a solution college athletes ...

    Read More

  • The NCAA and College Athlete

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    The athletes at these institutions bring in tons of money into their school every year and deserve compensation. These Universities are exploiting these athletes by not giving them back what they make for their school. The numbers say it all when it comes to the scamming of the athletes by their own schools. In 2004, over 40 schools brought in more than $10 million, with 10 of them bringing in over $30 million. Several athletes around the nation are worth more than $1 million to their school(Brown). Both of these statistics are proof that while these athletes are essential to their schools, they are still kept out of the revenue. Even though these Universities won’t pay their players, the schools still have no problem giving their coaches some money. In 40 U.S. states the head coach of the basketball or football program is the highest paid public official(Edelman). Over the past 20 years, there has been a major increase in the popularity of college athletes. From 1989 to 2004 there was a 27% increase in ticket revenue(Brown)...

    Read More

  • Why College Athletes Shouldn't Get Paid

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Salvador, Damon. “Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid?” 20 April 2013.Web. 18 May 2014.

    Read More

  • It’s Time to Pay College Athletes

    1701 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?” US News. U.S. News and World Report, Apr. 2013. Web. 05

    Read More

  • Warren Hartenstine's College Athletes Should Not Be Paid?

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    If there’s one thing we dread in the summer more than the heat, it’s the afflicting sentiment that surrounds oneself when one is inhibited from experiencing the thrills of football for six long and gruesome months. National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football is a part of many Americans’ Saturdays, but to fewer does it mean their lives. Recently coming under debate, many sporting fans and college athletes believe that players should be paid more than just tuition, room, board, and books. Two articles on this issue that bring up valid points worth discussing are Paul Marx’ “Athlete’s New Day” and Warren Hartenstine’s “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” From these articles I have found on the basis of logical,

    Read More

  • Analysis Of College Athletes Be Paid

    1152 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many people can easily picture this scene in their minds: the roaring crowds, the smell of easy- to-eat foods, and the thousands of people all dressed in the same colors. That’s a description of game day at a major college. College sports bring in a lot of money, yet their players don’t receive any money. Many people view this as something that needs to be changed while others believe that only professionals should be compensated. In the essays “Let Stars Get Paid” and “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid”, both authors give their opinions on whether or not college athletes should be paid. College athletes should not be paid because they already receive many benefits from being athletes.

    Read More

  • College Athletes: Employees or Students?

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    Paul Dietzel, former head coach of LSU, once said, “You can learn more character on the two-yard line than anywhere else in life.” Ever since the beginning, not only children but also college athletes have been playing sports for the love of the game and have used it as a way to grow character, teamwork, and leadership. Although when playing for a University an athletes job is to bring in profit for the school, this is not why these young men and women have continued with these sports they love. It is usually these students passion, a way for them to express themselves like others have art and music. The question has been up whether these college athletes should be paid for their loyalty and income for the University but by paying these students more than their given scholarship, it would defeat the purpose and environment of a college sport versus a professional sport, cause recruiting disputes, and affect the colleges benefits from these school athletics.

    Read More

  • College Athletes: Amateurs or Full Time Employees

    2012 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ever since college students started playing sports, back in 1879 when Harvard played Yale in the first collegiate sports game, the question of whether college athletes should be paid was addressed. From that point on athletes, coaches, and college administrators have brought forward points agreeing or disagreeing with the notion of paying college students. The students argue that they deserve to be paid due to the revenue that they bring for the college and because of the games they play and the championships they win. At first the idea of paying college athletes was out of the question, but now the argument has gone from a simple yes or no to a heated debate. Since college athletes are given a free education, they should not also be paid.

    Read More

  • Student Athletes Should Not be Paid

    1793 Words  | 4 Pages

    Student athletes should not be paid more than any other student at State University, because it implies that the focus of this university is that an extracurricular activity as a means of profit. Intercollegiate athletics is becoming the central focus of colleges and universities, the strife and the substantial sum of money are the most important factors of most university administration’s interest. Student athletes should be just as their title states, students. The normal college student is struggling to make ends meet just for attending college, so why should student athletes be exempt from that? College athletes should indeed have their scholarships cover what their talents not only athletically but also academically depict. Unfortunately, the disapproval resides when students who are making leaps academically are not being offered monetary congratulations in comparison to student athletes. If the hefty amount of revenue that colleges as a conglomerate are making is the main argument for why athletes should be paid, then what is to stop the National Clearinghouse from devising unjust standards? Eventually if these payments are to continue, coaches, organizations, and the NCAA Clearinghouse will begin to feel that “c...

    Read More

  • Paying College Athletes

    1281 Words  | 3 Pages

    The college athletes of their respective sports today, have the opportunity of showcasing their talents in competition on local and national programming on a regular basis which has lately brought attention this controversy, paying college athletes. The issue was brought on by the athletes over time, then caught onto coaches, sports columnists, and fans. The athletes dedicate themselves to the sport to a caliber comparable to the professional tier. The idea of paying the athletes could be considered as they play major factor in reputation of their schools, as well as funds for their schools. However most colleges do not have profitable sports teams. Thus, paying athletes would prove to be a very difficult endeavor and this could destroy college athletics as we know them today.

    Read More

  • Should Student-Athletes Be Paid?

    1960 Words  | 4 Pages

    College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.

    Read More

  • Why College Athletes Should NOT be Paid

    1764 Words  | 4 Pages

    The payment of NCAA student-athletes will deteriorate the value of an education to the athletes. The value of an education for a young man or woman cannot be measured. It is our gate way to success as...

    Read More

  • The NCAA and College Athletes: Should College Athletes Be Paid?

    1202 Words  | 3 Pages

    The NCAA prides itself as an organization dedicated to safeguarding the well-being of student-athletes and equipping them with the skills to succeed on the playing field, in the classroom and throughout life. In order to ensure that participants are students first and athletes second the NCAA has specific rules pertaining to athlete amateurism. The requirements prohibit contracts and tryouts with professional teams, salary for participating in athletics, prize money, and representation by an agent. (Amateurism) These rules not only limit the freedom of the player but also put the player at risk of being taken advantage of due to the lack of a players union and illegality of employing an agent. Other aspects of the NCAA’s rule book have been under scrutiny as well. Marc Edelman, Professor of Law at Baruch College, wrote in his treatise: Why the NCAA’s No-Pay Rules Violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act that courts are now beginning to overturn certain rules that are deemed anticompetitive. This development is important because according to the Sherman Act “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherw...

    Read More

  • Paying College Athletes

    1120 Words  | 3 Pages

    In recent years, the argument about whether or not to pay athletes playing at the college level has become a matter of national debate. Currently, the ruling is that college athletes cannot be paid. This is a stance that should be maintained. Paying athletes to compete at the collegiate level is unfeasible because it would cost colleges too much, influence student’s educational decisions and create an unfair financial atmosphere between athletes and non-athletes.

    Read More

More about No Paid Interview Summary

Open Document