No Long Term: New Work and the Corrosion of Character by Richar Sennett

678 Words2 Pages

Richard Sennett, the author of “No Long Term: New Work and The Corrosion of Character”, writes that the “qualities of good work [in the new economy] are not the qualities of good character. Furthermore, he argued that our work affects our character and ultimately, our prospects for personal fulfillment. Satisfaction affects everything from a person’s happiness and family life which may contribute to motivation and play a major role in an individual’s performance and commitment to their work.
Sennett’s first example of a person is Enrico. Enrico is a typical man that is trying to live the American Dream for his family. Enrico had worked as a janitor and saved money to go towards his children’s education so that they can get closer to the American Dream. Enrico knew when, how long and where he was supposed to work. By knowing that, he planned for his future in a long term manner. However, Enrico’s son Rico has developed a “no long term” nonchalant attitude about life which affects his character and work ethic. “He feared that the actions he needs to take and the way he has to live in order to survive in the modern economy have set his emotional, inner life adrift.”(Sennett 310) This type of fear has been built into his work history. Richard Sennett uses “No Long Term” as a motto which means “keep moving, don’t commit yourself, and don’t sacrifice.”(Sennett 314) This saying places corrosion upon values that should be instilled in human beings such as loyalty, respect and trust. With this saying, being used as a base in a person’s life will reflect a poor choice of character which is translated into different relationships in life whether it is personal or job-related.
The word character as it is described in “No Long Term:...

... middle of paper ...

...ence pointed to me. The operation managers then informed that two of the coworkers that I considered friends had told them these things. “Take the matter of commitment and loyalty. “No long term” is a principle which corrodes trust, loyalty, and mutual commitment. Trust can, of course, be a purely formal matter, as when people agree to a business deal or rely on another to observe the rules in a a game. But usually deeper experiences of trust are more informal, as when people learn on whom they can rely when given a difficult or impossible task. Such social bonds take time to develop, slowly rooting into the cracks and crevices of institutions.” (Sennett 313) However, that was not the case because the coworkers that betrayed had actually been taking the money. This incident affected my character and I felt as if I could not trust anyone in the establishment.

Open Document