Demand these days for athletic apparel and shoes are off the roof because of the health conscious culture. This trendy culture is all cross the world which brings a large profit for companies like Nike, Under Armor and etc. As the companies start to compete with celebrity sponsors or sports teams in this market naturally investors demand and stock prices increase. Nike generally has the largest earnings and highest gains to its share holders among all their American competitors (excluding adidas which is a German corporation). Nikes rising popularity creates a major stock demand and trade because it is one of the best performing mega-cap stocks rising 700%. Nikes Profit margins has expanded to 45% which which gives them and opportunity to
Nike is a household brand name not only in the United States but also throughout the world, although roughly half of sales are sourced in the United States (Brick). This dominance in North America, an area which represents $108.7 billion of the $282.3 billion worldwide, is key in the overall evaluation of the Nike assets (Euromonitor 1). Nike’s position of industry power is supported through their innovation in design as well as notable sponsorships and collaborations with professional athletes and tech companies like Apple. Their event and team sponsorships also elevate Nike to an elite level (4). However, competitors in this industry are quickly gaining momentum. For example, Under Armour has experienced notable growth in the past five years, and adidas continues to grow their presence in the United States. This has detracted some of the Nike dominance in the U.S. market
During the class period, the stock price for Abercrombie (otherwise known as their ticker symbol, ANF) increased by $5.49 (between May 17th and August 15th) and the percent change increased by 10.08%. The stock price change around the date of the lawsuit filing decreased by $8.37 (from August 15th to September 5th) and the percent change decreased by 13.95%. The graph below displays Abercrombie’s stock prices from January to September 2005. The graph demonstrates the increased stock prices from the first three press releases, a drop after Jeffries’ sale of shares in mid July, and then a continuing drop after the last two press releases. Additionally, The price spikes up at the start of the class action, on May 17th and continues to plumet through the end of the class action on August 16th and the litigation filing on September 2nd.
During a trip to Japan, they found a great athletic shoe with a new design
Only a week earlier, on June 28, 2001, Nike had held an analysts' meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results.1 The meeting, however, had another purpose: Nike management wanted to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Since 1997, its revenues had plateaued at around $9 billion, while net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million (see Exhibit 1). Nike's market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48%, in 1997, to 42% in 2000.2 In addition, recent supply-chain issues and the adverse effect of a strong dollar had negatively affected revenue.
Under Amour Company ventured into a market segment that was overcrowded, it had thousands of companies that competed against each other. Out of the many companies involved in the trade, the two most formidable threats seemed to be orchestrated by Nike and Adidas. These are two giant sports apparel and footwear, which pride themselves as having been long term veterans in the industry. Nike in particular was christened as the ultimate shoe and athletic apparel company with revenues of $18.6 billion, net income of $1.9 billion and more than thirty two thousand employees globally in the year 2008. This makes it the largest athletic shoe and apparel seller in the world.
Nike’s goal is to remain unique and different from others in terms of the items offered on the market. Arguably, Nike belongs to a monopolistically competitive market as there only a few organizations with the ability to regulate the amount charged for their product which means they cannot make their prices high as this is likely to make customers move on to other available choices (Nike, Inc., 2012). However, Nike can find a balance between the prices to charge for their products and remaining competitive with other companies in the industry. Nike has formed a distinction between the appearance and performance of their footwear and that of their competitors. Although products are differentiated from other companies, they still influence each other because they are items of the same
It has become impossible to avoid marketing and branding. Everywhere a consumer turns, they are being persuaded and influenced by all sorts of symbols, logos, slogans etc. These aspects of a brand create the culture we live in. “The effect, if not always the original intent, of advanced branding is to nudge the hosting culture into the background and make the brand the star. It is not to sponsor culture but to be the culture.” 30 no logo. Humanity has become one large sponsored event, making it impossible in order to escape.
This report is for individual or institutional investors who want to diversify their portfolio by investing in sportswear retail industry. Given the positive announcement of its high profit, it is suggested that JD sports Fashion Plc is undervalued and a final justification will be made in this report. The report will provide in-depth analysis of JD sports Plc. that includes the following content:
Nike’s Asian operations had previously continued to soar generating US$300 million in 1994 in revenues to a whopping US$1.2 billion in 1997. However based on the Asian economic crisis, this had adversely affected revenues, while regional layoffs were inevitable. Nike also performed well in the European market generating about US$2 billion in sales and a good growth momentum was expected, however, some parts of Europe were only slowly recovering from an economic downturn. In the Americas (Canada and the U.S.A.), Nike experienced a growth rate for several quarters. The U.S. alone generated approximately US$5 billion in sales. The Latin American market at this point was exposed to economic volatility; however Nike still saw them as a market with “great potential for the future”.
Nike does have the most sponsored players and they do have the most popular sports player on their side but just because they have Lebron James doesn't mean they have the best shoe/clothing item(s). Adidas have collabed with one of the most sensational artist out there and his name is Kanye West. Kanye West has brought up a whole new level to the shoe game and sponsorships. With creating one of the best designer shoes in the world, The Yeezy, he has singlehandedly changed the Adidas brand forever. “Kanye West is probably the most influential artist on the planet right now and sports adidas – even though the stripes are missing on his own Yeezy line.” (9 Reasons why adidas is better than nike.) No one wants to get the Lebron 13’s or Jordans when yeezy’s are out there. Adidas have several sponsorships/Collabs and they are revolutionary, way more than
Nike American Sportswear generated revenue of 7495 million US dollars in 2014, which was almost double of 2009 revenue of Nike Sportswear (Statista, 2015).The sales of (Athletic) Sportswear of Nike 90 million US dollars, however, the sale of Adidas Sportswear (Competitor of Nike) was 25 million US dollars, which was not even one third of Nike Sportswear sales (Statista, 2015).Nonetheless, the return on assets and equity are 13.41% and 26.43% respectively (Yahoo Finanace, 2015).
The marketing goals are: Increase customer retention, Increase eCommerce Sales, Increase our Community Involvement. The first goal specifically works towards reaching 60% repeat sales through different promotional strategies like emotional marketing and sponsoring different professional athletes. Customer retention is extremely important to maintain Nike’s market leader position. Increasing eCommerce is a major focus for Nike. Last year we were able to increase our eCommerce sales by a profitable 51%. Our second goal is to continue this trend by increasing online sales by 50% every year for the next four years. It is our belief that doing so will solidify Nike as a leader in the online athletic market. Nike truly believes that sport can change
Executive Summary Introduction Kimi Ford, a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group, a mutual-fund management firm, was considering buying shares in the fund she manages, the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund, with an emphasis on value investing. Ford held an analysts’ meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results and, most importantly, to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Nike has maintained revenue of about $9 billion since 1997. However, its net income had fallen from almost $800 million to $580 million. Moreover, Nike’s market share in U.S. athletic shoes has fallen from 48% in 1997 to 42% in 2000.
Nike, Inc is one of the leading companies in the world that is known for its brand of athletic footwear, apparel, equipment and accessories.
Nike’s positioning in the market has more of a mass appeal compared to their main competitor Adidas who strive to make products for elite athletes. The positioning strategy for Nike is currently working at a satisfactory level as Nikes global annual sales between 2013-2014 was reported as 27.8 billion (Statista, 2014) compared to Adidas’ 19.95 billion (Statista, 2014). The global market for sports apparel is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 4% between 2012-2019, Nikes compound annual growth rate during 2010-2012 was 12.3% which is an excellent result as the brand’s growth was larger than the market as well as outgrowing Nike’s closest competitors Adidas, Puma and Asics (Forbes,