Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
colonial experience of nigeria
Nigeria history at colonial rule
colonial experience of nigeria
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: colonial experience of nigeria
Ethnicity is how individuals perceive themselves, and unlike race it can be changed. There are countries in which there are several different types of ethnic groups, and in some cases that could lead to conflict within a country, but as research will show it is not the only cause, and in some cases the conflict was purposely organized. In such cases it is usually in a developing country, which is “defined according to their Gross National Income (GNI) per capita per year. Countries with GNI of US$ 11,905 and less and less are defined as developing (specified by the World Bank, 2012).” (CITATION) Developing countries that have established themselves as democracies tend to have weak institutions, where elections are more about connections and winning, rather than trying to establish and follow formal rules. Nigeria is both, a developing country and one with a weak democracy, there are many causes to this, such as problems with natural resources, and unable to maintain a strong formal government, but mainly it all could be traced back to the fact that it has a divided society where there is no sense of nationality. Divergence in a country does not mean violence, in the contrary in most cases places with a lot of different ethnicities tend to be peaceful, but Nigeria is exempt from this because it was, in a sense, programmed for all the different ethnicities and religions to have conflict amongst each other by the British.
Nigeria became an area of slave trade for the British Empire in about 1807, but they did not officially make it a colony until the 20th century. The British created Nigeria for the sole purpose of revenue; it is an “artificial country…the colonial borders enclosed more than 250 ethnic groups that has never been ru...
... middle of paper ...
...ional Agreements, Population, Social Statistics, Political System." Nigeria The 1966 Coups, Civil War, and Gowon's Government - Flags, Maps, Economy, History, Climate, Natural Resources, Current Issues, International Agreements, Population, Social Statistics, Political System. N.p., 27 Mar. 2005. Web. 09 Apr. 2014.
"Democracy and Governance in Nigeria: Reflecting on 51 Years of Independence." Democracy and Governance in Nigeria: Reflecting on 51 Years of Independence. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2014.
Draper, Alan, and Ansil Ramsey. The Good Society: An Introduction to Comparative Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2008. Print.
Jensen, N. "Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa." Comparative Political Studies 37.7 (2004): 816-41. Print.
Lijphart, Arend. "Constitutional Design for Divided Societies." Journal of Democracy 15.2 (2004): 96-109. Print.
“Nigeria has always been a divided country plagued by weak governance, ethnic cleavages, and corruption”("The Historical Background of Boko Haram", 2014). Also, “Boko Haram was born in this context, with religious fervor growing in the Muslim north and finally manifesting itself in violent Islamist terrorism"( "The Historical Background of Boko Haram", 2014). When the British pull out the region, it left the Northern parts of Nigeria unstable and not ensuring that northern Nigeria opened the door to corruption by terror groups. “The system led by Bifurcated country with a productive south flush with oil wealth and impoverishes north struggling to reconcile modernization with dictates of the orthodox and rapacious power broker”(Wall, 2015). The country was not modernized like the southern part of Nigeria and majority of the people were uneducated and poor.
Yang, C.. (2010). Less Blood for Oil: Nigeria's Fragile Amnesty. Harvard International Review, 31(4), 6-7. Retrieved September 22, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1988429401).
While the outside world considered Nigeria to be a united and monolithic entity, even the British colonial administration was wary of the reality of Nigerian politics; the nation was not so much a “country” as it was more than three hundred different groups coalesced into one.4 5 These tribes were divided between three main spheres of influence: the Yoruba, the Igbo, and the Hausa. Historically, their interests were often opposed, and their cultures did not come into regular contact with one another until the British occupation. In spite of the differences British administration a...
Nigeria is a constitutional republic in West Africa. The majority of its citizens are Muslim (50.5%) and Christians (48.2%), the rest belongs to other smaller local religions. Because of this major diversity in the religious viewpoints many of the citizens in the Nigeria does not identify themselves as people
It is going to take a lot of work to avoid the past from reoccurring. Ababakar has got to set up a sound government structure in order for a democracy to succeed. Also, human rights have got to be improved, and they have to recover economically. I can only say it again; it is going to take a lot of work, but if the past can be avoided, Nigeria could build itself to be a respectable nation on the world stage.
The following statement from a book reviews that I was reading by Holzgrefe et al. On” The Struggle for Modern Nigeria: The Biafran War 1967–1970 “by Michael Gould, really lays out what the conflict was in this bloody war”. The war had its origins in ethnic rivalry within the Nigerian army. After Abubakar Tafawa Balewa’s government was overthrown in January 1966, in a coup led by junior-ranked Igbo officers, Major-General Johnson AguiyiIronsi was nominated Head of State by those government ministers who had survived the coup. Given that Aguiyi-Ironsi was an Igbo and that those killed in the coup were senior politicians from the Western and Northern provinces (including Tafawa Balewa and the Northern premier Ahmadu Bello), the coup quickly became characterized as an Igbo conspiracy to control Nigeria.” It is clear here as we see children of the same land betraying one another because of certain greediness, misunderstanding, and personal interest as is the relationship between the two sisters who fight over things which could have been stopped if they only thought things through. The author of the review continues the statement further, saying: “Though Aguiyi-Ironsi was quickly overthrown in a counter-coup masterminded by northern Muslim officers, which placed General Yakubu Gowon as the new head of the Federal Military Government (FMG), ethnic tensions spiralled. Consequently, anti-Igbo pogroms in the north followed, with 30,000 Igbos being killed and over one million fleeing the north to the eastern part of the country. Such widespread ethnic violence alongside the reversal of Aguiyi-Ironsi’s own coup led many Igbos to conclude that a united Nigeria could not guarantee their safety or their equal role in the country and that secession was a viable option.”Prior to the colonialist, it can be said that though conflict existed between the many tribes
To adapt one of Isichei's claims, Nigeria's “confrontation with an alien culture, its conquest, and the experience of an alien rule, created … [crises]” (180). There were many riots and conflicts between the Nigerians and the British, although most of the uprisings were eventually subdued by the military power of the British. Riots were common—from the culturally rooted Yoruba riots in the West and the religious skirmishes with the Muslims and Hausa in the North, to the confrontations with the naturally ‘rich,' yet stubborn Igbo and Delta states. Apart from encompassing all the major ethnic groupings and regions in Nigeria, amazingly these conflicts also covered the three most explicit British inculcations: cultural, religious, and economic.
Ogundiya, S, 2009, 'The Cycle of Legitimacy Crisis in Nigeria:A Theoretical Exploration', Usman Danfodiyo University,Nigeria: Sokoto, Accessed on 12th May 2012, [http://www.krepublishers.com/02-Journals/JSS/JSS-20-0-000-09-Web/JSS-20-2-000-09-Abst-PDF/JSS-20-02-129-09-759-Ogundiya-I-S/JSS-20-02-129-09-759-Ogundiya-I-S-Tt.pdf].
Nigerian culture is as multi-ethnic as the people in Nigeria. The people of Nigeria still cherish their traditional languages, music, dance and literature. Nigeria comprises of three large ethnic groups, which are Yoruba, Hausa-Fulani and Igbo.
Nigeria, a country that exalts itself as the “Giant of Africa”, viewed by neighboring countries as “big in words, little in action,” has an opportunity to walk softly, but carry a big stick. Islamic terrorist group, Boko Haram, which operates in the northern states of Nigeria, has arguably gained control of the area and has incited fear in many of northern Nigeria’s citizens. Violence has spread like wildfire in parts of Nigeria, and people are asking, “is Nigeria capable of dealing with an insurgency of this level?”, and “If Nigeria is being significantly threatened by a group as loosely organized, but as deadly, as Boko Haram, what chance do we have to contain an insurgency?” Nigeria has the potential to be an economic powerhouse of Africa, which undoubtedly will influence other nations in the immediate area. This potential can be fully realized, and expanded upon, if Nigeria is able to deal with forces that aim to cripple it. This assessment will evaluate the internal threats that Nigeria faces, analyze the regional impact that Nigeria has on the continent of Africa, and demonstrate cause and effects.
As Nigeria celebrates 100 years of unification between their northern and southern halves, they stand poised to assume a leadership role among African countries. With over 250 different ethnic groups comprising its citizenry, even a nation as successfully diverse as Nigeria can expect to encounter some roadblocks to establish and maintain stability. The biggest threats facing Nigeria today are systemic corruption, terrorist violence, and social/human rights.
In both the North and South regions there were distinctly different governmental systems. In the Northern region Traditional Islamic Law was implemented, this went against the Christianity of the British colonialists, however unlike many colonial rulers of the time they allowed their colonies to keep their governing systems and actually elevated their authority. This was in Britain’s best interest as it meant that all they needed to do in their colonies in terms of governance was make sure that taxes were paid. In the Northern region this happened fairly easily, as the leaders who were already in power continued their reign. However in the South where there were several stateless societies and people had never been governed before so it was slightly more difficult to instate leaders whom people would listen to. However any destruction this caused was local and there proved to be no conflict between the Southern and Northern regions. There were several benefits that British colonialists brought, these included Western Education and freed trade in the region, this created room for expansion of both Christianity and Islam; which was even spread to Yoruba territories in the South. Another benefit that the British colonialism brought was a Nigerian Identity, what the British had done was unify to separate regions
However, abolishing the political parties does not destroy the political conflict. In fact, the strife is not eliminated but a vacuum is made between the leaders and the led (Dudley 86). Under military rule, the people of Nigeria were overwhelmed with corruption, fraud, embezzlement, and political instability (Johnson). These problems were reoccurring throughout the twenty-one years of military rule.
Abolishing the indigene clause would put an end to the ethno-religious divides that hinder development of a common identity. With 36 states currently struggling for roles in the government, the political process has become saturated with conflict and divisions. The indigene clause only serves to further divide the people of Nigeria. It makes sense to want to represent all ethnic groups in order to accurately represent the nation as a whole. However, the imbalance of socioeconomic development has made it impossible to have qualified people from each state in top government positions. For example, a candidate from the north might be chosen solely based on his geographical allegiance instead of any real intellect or relevant qualifications for the position. Having such a large number of ethnic groups makes creating one common identity tremendously problematic, and abolishing ...
Post-colonial politics in Nigeria are born out of civil strife, and military dictatorships. A major impetus for political schism in Nigeria was the Biafran war. Following a military coup led by an Igbo man named Chukwuma Nzeogwu in 1966, there was an anti-Igbo riot in which 30,000 Igbos were killed and up to a million Igbos fled as refugees. As a reaction to the prejudice and violence that the Hausas and the Yoruba inflicted upon the Igbos, the Igbos seceded under the leadership of General Ujokwu. They then formed a new country called Biafra in 1967. The Nigerian government immediately moved to quash the rebellion because the Biafra region was abundant in Nigeria’s most prized resource: oil.