New York Bombing Case Study

802 Words2 Pages

New York bombing: Could blasts affect race for White House? The story is about both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump campaigns try to gain the “upper hand and revealed a bit about their strategies heading into the final months of the election” using New York City bombings. After the New York bombing incident, Donald Trump has “another opportunity to prove his mettle as commander-in-chief.” Donald Trump in the telephone interview on Monday morning said that “"I should be a newscaster because I called it before the news," and, "What I said was exactly correct." On contrary, Hillary Clinton scheduled press conference on Monday morning which she said "We also know from the former head of our counterterrorism center, Matt Olsen, that the kinds of rhetoric and language that Mr. Trump has used …show more content…

Who has the power, authority, and/or legitimacy in this story? This story tell us the relationship amongst the American government are opposing to each other in order influence the people to vote for them. Donald Trump appeals is based on racism to attract his voters; whereas, Hillary Clinton appeals to the low income, middle class voters which Michael Linden suggest that “Clinton wants to close tax loopholes that benefit the very rich and ask the wealthy to pay more into Social Security, whereas it is an article of faith among the GOP that taxes on the rich must always always always go down.” The supporter of this both party have different view so that they will never be in good relationship with each other. In this article, Donald Trump further make his point by using this issue on New York bombing incident on what he said was “exactly correct.” This story tell that relationship between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is not great; relationship between their supporters are not that great

Open Document