Advantages And Disadvantages Of Neo Marxism

1003 Words3 Pages

Neo-Marxists were starting to apply Marxism to the classic monopolistic economy. But there are two reason of the methodological change of Marxist economics. The first reason is change of economy, which does not manifest in non repeated crisis. Therefore, neo-Marxist school refused to use same at the fools available that resulted in a new form of Marxist theory. The second reason is the Keynesian revolution , resulted in the division of economics into micro and macro levels. So, neo-Marxists had to apply additional methods to enter the macroeconomic level. Keynesian method and world-systems theory deserve special attention. It is Keynesianism that makes possible for the radical political economists to apply the bipolar model, centered on both the production and the consumption. This made it possible to analyze the concepts of demand, investment, etc. More over Paul Sweezy puts forward the concept of broken demand curve under oligopoly with the Keynesian method. Paul Baran develops the theory of dependence and center-periphery model by means of world-systems theory. …show more content…

It was Kalecki who could establish the connection between monopoly (on the micro-level) and stagnation (on the macro-level). In 1962 Mihał Kalecki got interested in the work of Paul Baran, The Political Economy of Growth, just at the time when Baran and Sweezy were working on Monopoly Capital. It must be considered the beginning of collaboration of neo-Marxist school and Mihał

Open Document