Negative Effects Of Roman Conquests

375 Words1 Page

Negative Effects of the Conquests of Rome The conquests of Rome had several negative effects. Rome became more interested in wealth than honor, crave power, be oppressive to their subjects, despise simplicity, and their religion became corrupted by other religions. I will attempt to explain why these were bad things.

Rome conquered other nations, plundering their wealth and gaining subjects. Rome was rich. History can tell us, that when nations become rich, they become greedy. Rome wanted more. They overtaxed them, allowed the governors to be abusive, and did not give them the rights of citizenship(Morey, W. C., Ph.D., 1901). Rome's treasuries grew but at the cost of the people conquered. Rome was oppressive to the people they conquered. They were under Roman control, but Rome did not control them with any degree of fairness or compassion. They were greedy, abusive, and oppressive.

Another issue is that Rome lost its culture. It began to become showy, incorporating myths, customs, and traditions from other cultures. Greece was the most common one to impact Rome, but Asian rites and myths were also …show more content…

Rome really became a multi-cultural, multi-faith, multi-government system, which is not a bad thing. The problem is that Rome took the bad aspects of each culture, and not necessarily the good. Rome borrowed the showy and elaborate traditions of Greece. Rome began to love money, power, and control over honor, truth, and justice (Morey, W. C., Ph.D.0, 1901). It allowed other cultures to influence it. The result was a nation that was driven by ambitions of conquering the world, amassing a large fortune, and controlling people, instead of one that would allow everyone to live in peace and unity. It lost sight of its goals, to be an honorable nation, and became corrupt. That is the biggest negative effect of the Roman conquest. The loss of the Roman

Open Document