Negative Effects Of Gladiators

1594 Words4 Pages

The Gladiators and Their Positive Effects on Ancient Roman Society

When one thinks about ancient Roman civilization, many things come to mind. One of the prominent aspects about their society was the gladiatorial games. Although the name might imply fun competition, they were much different than what we would consider games in our modern times. These battles between men were considered entertainment for the masses in the Roman world, similar to how we watch sports such as soccer or basketball. Essentially, gladiators consisted of slaves, criminals, and volunteers. They would be trained in hand to hand combat as well as fighting with weapons. They would then be forced into an arena, called a coliseum, in order to fight each other or fight
Around the year 70 BC, a prominent gladiator by the name of Spartacus escaped and rallied up the other gladiators into a rebellion. While the Roman legions were fighting in the Third Mithridatic War, Spartacus and his fellow gladiators, who were also slaves, rose up and began their rebellion, killing many of the troops remaining in Rome. The senate appointed a man by the name of Crassus in order to deal with the uprising (Köhne). Crassus was able to successfully defeat Spartacus and his men in 71 BC. Although it may seem that destroying a slave uprising was a bad thing for the common Roman, it was actually beneficial in terms of development of the state. For the defeat of Spartacus, Crassus was awarded a shared position of the consulship. The consulship is a position in the government of the Roman republic who was the highest elected official (Barton). Many attribute Crassus as a key component of the transformation of the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire. If it was not for Spartacus the gladiator and his rebellions, we may have not seen the transformation of the republic until much later. The Roman Empire was much better for the people of Rome because, although it consolidated power to one person, it removed the law making power of the senatorial class and the oppression that it

Open Document