Vygotsky Nature Vs Nurture Theory

962 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: summary of vygotsky's theory of early childhood

Abstract Nature versus nurture is an argument in psychology over whether a person’s innate qualities and behaviors are caused from their environment or if they’re born with it. Vygotsky places more emphasis on the social factors that contribute to cognitive development, in other words he is in favor of the nurture argument. He believes that everyone learns from their culture, environment, and social interactions. He talks about a few of his theories like the zone of proximal development, and a more knowledgeable other. He also expresses his thoughts on developmental tools and the importance of language to cognitive development. All of these factors together support his idea that children’s behavior is learned. Zone of Proximal …show more content…

Vygotsky refers to these as tools of intellectual adaptation, which allow children to use basic mental functions more effectively, and these are culturally determined (McLeod, 2007). Vygotsky sees cognitive functions as things that are affected by beliefs, values, and these tools of adaptation of the culture in which a person develops. These tools vary culture to culture, but all play a large role in development. Even personal thoughts, the decisions that someone makes alone, are all effected by socio-cultural actions (Balakrishnan & Claiborne, 2012). Vygotsky also insists that emotion is an important part of understanding consciousness. He emphasized the development and cultural construction not only of meaning, but of emotion and directivity. It is hoped that through these two domains, the moral actions of children become acceptable and guide them into becoming moral citizens. (Balakrishnan & Claiborne, …show more content…

(2012). Vygotsky from ZPD to ZCD in moral education: reshaping Western theory and practices in local context. Journal Of Moral Education, 41(2), 225-243. doi:10 Gredler, M. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the Classroom: Is It Too Late?. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 113-131. doi:10. McLeod, S. (2007). Lev Vygotsky. Simply Psychology Salonen, L. (2013). L. S. Vygotsky 's psychology and theory of learning applied to the rehabilitation of aphasia: A developmental and systemic view. Aphasiology, 27(5), 615-635. doi:10. Vanderburg, R. (2006). Reviewing Research on Teaching Writing Based on Vygotsky 's Theories: What We Can Learn. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(4),

Show More
Related

  • Debate on Educational Constructivist Approach: Windschitl V.S. Hirsch

    1070 Words  | 3 Pages

    This reading reminded me about how Vygotsky’s theory is mostly based on the interactions and influences help children to learn. I really do believe this theory is very accurate, because students can learn from each other. If a teacher is having trouble explaining a complex topic to a student, another student can explain it in more relatable way. Also, I was fascinated when I read about what cultural tools, were and how they related to Vygotsky’s beliefs. Learning about what cultural tools were, helped me to broaden my understanding of how crucial cultural tools are to student’s learning process. Also, the chapter did a great job of elaborating on how these tools can help to advance and grow in the understanding of student’s thinking process. Another aspect of this reading that interested me was the elaboration on private speech and the Zone of Proximal Development. Each of the definitions displayed help me to advance my own thinking on what it was and how it is used in regards to the education of students. The description of what private speech and how it is basically the inner narration of their thinking process helped me to understand how this aspect can help with students learning. Also, the Zone of Proximal Development helped me to make a connection to both what is and how it relates to private speech as well. The Zone of proximal development plays a crucial role in the

    Read More

  • Nature vs. Nurture

    1206 Words  | 3 Pages

    The nature vs. nurture controversy is an age old question in the scientific and psychological world with both camps having evidence to support their theories. The controversy lies in which is more influential in the development of human beings. While there is no definitive answer for this, it is interesting to look at each of them separately.

    Read More

  • Nature vs Nurture: Twin Studies and Adoption

    1969 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)

    Read More

  • Compare Vygotsky And Piaget

    1067 Words  | 3 Pages

    Vygotsky placed much more emphasis on language that Piaget (book). Vygotsky’s theory focuses on the role of interpersonal processes and the role of the child’s community and culture which provide a framework from which the child’s construction of meaning develops (book). Although Vygotsky stressed that the process must be in in the context of the child’s culture and the tools available within that culture. Vygotsky was always especially interested in cognitive processes which underline understanding which has led to the concept of shared understandings that occur when people communicate with each other. Vygotsky argued that through the use of language formed through social interaction a child can develop as a thinker and a learner (book). As a conscious individual people could not accomplish very much without the aids and tools within their culture such as language (book). Piaget argued that language was strongly influenced by the underlying cognitive structures within the individual child (book). They also disagreed on the egocentric speech of children. When observing children Piaget concluded that half of the mistakes children made was down to egocentric speech which he argued showed that children have not tried to communicate with another or adapted so others can understand them he also argued that young children did not seem to care if anyone else could understand them and

    Read More

  • The Use of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory in Education

    1936 Words  | 4 Pages

    Four years later in 1917, Vygotsky graduated from Moscow University and landed a job as a literature teacher at one of the local secondary schools in Gomel, Russia. He would continue his work as a teacher from 1917-1924, when he resigned to accept a job at the local teacher’s college. There, one of Vygotsky’s responsibilities was to teach courses in psychology, which is what sparked his interest in psychology, specifically cognitive development of children. During 1924, Vygotsky met a man by the name of Alexander Luria who worked at Moscow’s Institute of Psychology (MIP). Impressed by Vygotsky’s work, Luria offered him a job working at MIP, which allowed him the opportunity to work and study the cognitive development of children and adults suffering from numerou...

    Read More

  • Describe the process by which genes and environment operate together to influence development.

    2109 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...agreed with Piaget as his theory ignored the social environment. Vygotsky argued society was essential to child development as it allowed child interaction with others. He argued that language is acquired by the child “internalizing social interactions”. A child learns from another person and after interactions are repeated several times the child internalizes it. Vygotsky argued this can only be achieved with another person and carried out in the child’s “zone of proximal development”. Both Vygotsky and Piaget felt a child was active in the their own development. Vygotsky argues environment and its interactions shape the child, in contrast Piaget’s theory is more biologically linked.

    Read More

  • Lev Vygotsky and Social Development Theory

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lev Vygotsky(1896-1934) was a Russian psychologist who created the Social Development Theory/ Sociocultural Theory. Vygotsky believed that children's mental, language, and social development is supported and enhanced through social interaction. Vygotsky also believed that beginning at birth, children seek out adults for social interactions and that development occurs through these interactions. The belief that social development sets a precedent for development(appeals to the nurture side of development). The general idea from this theory is that being aware, consciousness, and cognition are the end results of socialization and social interaction. It stated that, "Sociocultural approaches to learning and development were first systematized and applied by Vygotsky and his collaborators in Russia in the 1920s and 1930s. They are based on the concept that human activities take in cultural contexts, are mediated by language and other symbol systems, and can be best understood when investigated in their historical development(John-Steiner & Mahn, 1996)." At the core of this theory, " Vygotsky focused on the way that a child co-constructs meaning through social interaction, and the role word meaning plays in the development of thinking(Mahn, 1999)."

    Read More

  • Childhood Theories In Childhood

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    Vygotsky believed that children developed by what belief and culture they brought up in. He strongly believed that children would learn more from hand on experience and that children would develop better with people around them so they were continuously socialising and communicating.

    Read More

  • Jean Piaget And Lev Vygotsky's Theory Of Development

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    Children are like sponges, they absorb information as well as habits around them. Children have many interactions daily and these interactions affect a child’s learning development. For example, a child who is raised in a stressed environment is not as likely to succeed as a child who is not raised in that type of environment. That isn 't to say that a child wont, however they are less likely. Children learn through their environment whether it is good or bad. Children learn morals, values and even bias’s from the environment they are raised in. From my own experience, my parents shaped the person I am today. My interaction with them on a daily basis influenced my cognitive development. For example, as a toddler my mother explained she would put a book filled with shapes in front of me. My mother would play with me and show me a few shapes that would fit in the holes. She would leave me alone and I eventually figured out the different shapes and where they belonged. This is an example of interaction influencing the cognitive development of a child. Vygotsky also emphasized the importance of private speech and instead of calling it “immature” they were maturing. Children sometimes need to verbally explain to themselves an action they are doing. This can help the child understand better as well as be able to relate it to experiences later on. This private speech was a sign that children were moving to a stage of self-regulation. Vygotsky believed that children relate this with experiences. Whether it be from their parents or something they have watched on

    Read More

  • Similarities And Similarities Between Piaget And Vygotsky

    1342 Words  | 3 Pages

    The similarities in the theories, including the development perspective and dialectical approach, are very complex and focus upon the fundamentals of each theory. The differences in each theory make them very unique, including the autonomous and heteronomous approaches for each respective theory. The four cognitive stages of Piaget’s theory, including sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operations, and formal operations, provide a clear, effective progression of an individual’s development path from infancy to adulthood. This is very unique to Piaget’s theory and is utilized immensely in academic studies of psychology. The fundamental aspects of Vygotsky’s theory, including cultural and historical factors contributing to the individual’s development is also very unique and is regularly utilized in academic studies. Without the research that each theorist conducted and presented, the psychology studies that we know today would not be the same. The work of both respective theorists will continue to be utilized in academia and in psychology for many years to

    Read More

  • How Nurture is More Dominant than Nature

    1120 Words  | 3 Pages

    Undoubtedly, humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy over whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has occupied the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough reading of experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to be convinced that nurture does play a far more important in the development of a human than nature.

    Read More

  • Essay On Object Permanence

    1102 Words  | 3 Pages

    Vygotsky Ideas: One of his ideas on child cognition is that it is social as well as language centered. The growth of language is directly related to the child’s change in thinking. He also says the infants share the same perceptions, memory capacities as well as attention to animals, which get enhanced through their interaction with the surroundings. He also opposes the individualistic understanding in the growth of the infants and advocates for social development (Berk,

    Read More

  • The Sociocultural Theory

    1726 Words  | 4 Pages

    Vygotsky believed that during the early stages of life as infants, language (nonconceptual speech) and thinking (nonverbal thought) were separate areas of development. Nonconceptual speech would be a child mumbling words without completely understanding their meaning. A child observing or playing with an object without using words would be nonverbal thought. As intellectual development continues, verbal thought begins connecting these two areas during early childhood. When this starts happening, children start using self-directed speech, “a verbal behavior in which children talk to themselves, naming objects or narrating their actions-particularly as they solve problems” (Trawick-Smith, 2010, p.53). This action demonstrates that children are being guided in learning through using language. Vygotsky believed that this verbal thought became more and more prominent throughout development and this learning continued to progress within the rest of the child’s life.

    Read More

  • Vygotsky Cognitive Development Essay

    760 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though Piaget didn’t believe in the significance of inputs that could be acquired from the environment, but yet Vygotsky was very confident that children that children where very acknowledgeable of the inputs from their environment around them. Piaget’s cognitive development theory has four stages to it. His first stage was the sensorimotor stages which happens from birth until a child is two years old. This stages infants rely solely on their reflexes like rooting and sucking. Preoperational stage is the 2nd stage and it happen from the age of 2years old up until a child is 7 years of age, and during this stage children feel as if everyone thinks like they do. His 3rd stage is known as the concrete operational stage, that occurs when children are 7-11 years of age and during this stage children will start to feel a lot of improvement in their thinking. Piaget’s last stage was known as the formal operational stage, and at this stage children are able to understand and recognize symbols, and master abstract thinking. Children are also have the ability to solve intricate problems on their own. And even in contrast, Vygotsky assumed that there are no set of phases. And even in contrast Vygotsky thought that there was no set of phrase for children. But he felt that private speech was way more essential to the aid for children when they are thinking about an issue they are having/ going through. Private speech can be internalized sooner or later, but it’s something that never goes away. Unlike Piaget, Vygotsky didn’t think that the development could be detached from social context while children can create knowledge and lead their

    Read More

  • Vygotsky and His Socio-cultural Theory

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lev Vygotsky’s life began on 1896 in Orscha, Belarus, he was born into a Russian- Jewish family. Vygotsky had won a place at the University of Moscow in 1913 which is where he received a degree in law and a specialisation in literature. After completing his degree he taught children and adults a variety of subject areas. He became then interested in children with learning difficulties and intellectual disabilities. Through this event he was invited to join the Institute of Psychology in Moscow. Vygotsky moved there and began a collaboration with two other Russian psychologists. They in turn developed a ‘cultural-historical’ or ‘sociocultural’ view of human development that looked in depth of cognitive activities (Duchesne S, et al, 2013). Vygotsky’s theory therefore was established from his past experiences and his interests in children’s development.

    Read More

More about Vygotsky Nature Vs Nurture Theory

Open Document