Natural Rights

1513 Words4 Pages

Writing Assignment #1

Natural rights are rights obtained through natural law. They are the right to life, liberty and property and the pursuit of happiness. This means they are not given by any kind of government power or being. Therefore it's safe to say they cannot be defined. It is more or less the ability to make moral judgments, and differentiate between good and evil. Agency is vital when determining what is perceived as natural rights. By definition natural laws are the moral standards that govern our human behavior.
In our day to day activities, we are faced with making decisions that shapes who we end up becoming. For example choosing to steal from the gas station instead of just paying for it shows huge deficiencies in any moral
The Rule of Law promotes personal freedom and accountability.
Along with the Rule of Law, there is also the Rule of Will. This is when one’s power outweighs that of the other. For example, this would be, if the government decided to create laws that restricted our natural rights..they are many types of government but because of this discussion we going to concentrate on monarchies and democracies.
There are a lot of differences between a monarchy and democracy. In a monarchy there is really only one leader who makes all the decisions for the people.No doubt it is a good system if only your leader is a righteous leader. This system though has its downside in a sense that the fate of everyone in the community is based off what one individual tells you to do. What if that one leader wants you to pay a high tax that you don't want to pay, or he asks you to go to war over something that you don't even agree with? Then what do you do? In a monarchy the leader can misuse his power for personal gain. He can make himself rich and deprive the poor of their goods and possessions. These are some of the major flaws in having a monarchy control
Yet this form of government did come back to bite them in their back. Hence there is a need that democracy is practiced. One thing both “Common Sense” and “The Declaration of Independence” frowned upon was the autocratic rule of leaders without consulting their subjects to know their needs and problems. The will of the king is as much as the laws of the land which is handed to the people under a more formidable shape of an act of parliament. (Paine) Hence a bad king can declare war among his people and that makes him impeachable due to the system of monarchy. “And this is due to the pride of kings.” (Paine) Then this leader must be taken out. Even if it meant with force. Throughout history the people have always risen against tyrannical leaders who decided to use their power and position to their benefits alone. Remember King Noah and his wicked judges…..(Mosiah) Indeed “The cause of America was a great measure the cause of all mankind” Paine's common sense puts it. The British then were the powerhouses. They ruled large parts of Europe, Asia, the Americas, Africa and the Middle East. The king of England was in substantial, king of the world. Yet when the citizens of the new world rose up and demanded for certain basic rights such as; to be part of the

Open Document