Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
battle of little bighorn battle analysis
little big horn battle analysis
battle of little bighorn battle analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: battle of little bighorn battle analysis
Times were very hard for Native Americans during the mid to late 1800s. The reasons for their afflictions could only be blamed upon the United States of America. For thousands of years, Native Americans had roamed around the Americas. There had also been many tribes spread across the West that fought between each other in order to have their land.1 It wasn’t until after reconstruction in the United States, that the white Americans started having ordeals with the Native Americans. The main tribes involved in the conflict starting around 1850 were the Lakota people and the Sioux. The relationship between them can only be remembered for broken treaties and wars. It is true that these tribes had only mind there own business for many centuries for the White Americans. It wasn’t around the 1850’s, that the United States were interested in the gold that was existing in the territories the belonged to the Native Americans. This would be the starting point of what historians call the Indian Wars that would last about half a century. The question is though, why? Why were there so many battles between the United States government and the Native Americans? Why was there so many hatred between them? Finally, who caused the violence? Many historians would believe that the government only wanted to have gold and then leave the Indian’s at peace and that they were the ones that acted irrationally. However, this is in fact a lie. It is genuine that they also wanted to rob them from there identity and who the Native Americans were as people. There was something much more than just gold in the Indian Wars. Although it may seem that the United States government only wanted riches from the Native American’s land, they actually wanted to extract t...
... middle of paper ...
...is, Rice Fort, and Sitting Bull. "1876 The Battle of the Little Big Horn." 1. Accessed January 30, 2014. 1
26 Crazy Horse, 1
27 Crazy Horse, 1
28 Marquis, 2
29 "General Custer and the Gold Rush", 11
30 Bridger, Bobby. "Sitting Bull and Buffalo Bill." MAS ULTRA 17, no. 4 (December 2004): 1-17. Accessed January 26, 2004, 1
31 Bridger, 2
32 Bridger, 4
33 Bridger, 4
34 McLaughlin, James. "An Account of Sitting Bull's Death by James McLaughlin Indian Agent at Standing Rock Reservation (1891)." PBS. 1891. Accessed January 28, 2014, 1
35 McLaughlin, 2
36 Horse, American, Turning Hawk, Captain Sword, and Spotted Horse. "Lakota Accounts of the Massacre at Wounded Knee." PBS. Accessed January 28, 2014. 1
37 Robertson, Paul M. Wounded Knee Massacre, 1890. Accessed January 30, 2014. 2
38 Robertson, 2
39 Robertson, 3
40 Robertson, 4
The United States government initially celebrated the Battle at Wounded Knee as the final conflict between Native Americans and the United States military - after which the western frontier was considered safe for the incoming settlers. Over 20 medals were awarded to the soldiers for their valor on the battlefield. However, the understanding has changed regarding what actually took place at Wounded Knee on December 29, 1890. The Hollywood version of the Battle of Wounded Knee accurately presents the case that the Battle at Wounded Knee was actually a massacre of the Sioux - the culminating act of betrayal and aggression carried out by the United States military,
Sitting Bull is a Dakota Indian chief, of the Sioux tribes and also is a Warrior, Military Leader. Sitting Bull, born in 1831, Grand River, South Dakota. His parents’ names are, Jumping Bull (father) and (mother) Her-Holy-Door. He was named Jumping badger at birth. Although, he showed a lot bravery, courage of riding, which’d been witnessed by his tribe. Once he returned to his village, jumping bull celebrated a feast for his son. The name (Tatanka Iyotake), in the Lakota language means "Buffalo Bull Sits Down”, which was later shortened to “Sitting Bull”. At the ceremony before the whole tribe, also Sitting Bull's father presented him with an eagle feather to wear in his hair, a warrior's horse, and a hardened buffalo hide to set his son's journey into manhood. During the War in 1862, Sitting Bull's people weren’t involved, were coupled groups of eastern Dakota killed about 800 soldiers in Minnesota. In 1864, two large body of troop’s soldiers under General Alfred Sully attacked their village. The contest took a legal charge that was led by Sitting Bull and driven the Lakota and Dakota people out.
Callison, Jill. "South Dakota Moments: Gazing into the Eyes of Sitting Bull." Argus Leader. Dec 15 2010. ProQuest. Web. 3 Mar. 2014.
With hope that they could even out an agreement with the Government during the progressive era Indian continued to practice their religious beliefs and peacefully protest while waiting for their propositions to be respected. During Roosevelt’s presidency, a tribe leader who went by as No Shirt traveled to the capital to confront them about the mistreatment government had been doing to his people. Roosevelt refused to see him but instead wrote a letter implying his philosophical theory on the approach the natives should take “if the red people would prosper, they must follow the mode of life which has made the white people so strong, and that is only right that the white people should show the red people what to do and how to live right”.1 Roosevelt continued to dismiss his policies with the Indians and encouraged them to just conform into the white’s life style. The destruction of their acres of land kept being taken over by the whites, which also meant the destruction of their cultural backgrounds. Natives attempted to strain from the white’s ideology of living, they continued to attempt with the idea of making acts with the government to protect their land however they never seemed successfully. As their land later became white’s new territory, Indians were “forced to accept an ‘agreement’” by complying to change their approach on life style.2 Oklahoma was one of last places Natives had still identity of their own, it wasn’t shortly after that they were taken over and “broken by whites”, the union at the time didn’t see the destruction of Indian tribes as a “product of broken promises but as a triumph for American civilization”.3 The anger and disrespect that Native tribes felt has yet been forgotten, white supremacy was growing during the time of their invasion and the governments corruption only aid their ego doing absolutely nothing for the Indians.
The Battle of the Little Big Horn, 1876, “Eye Witness to History. Retrieved November 20, 2011 from www.eyewitnesstohistory.com.
The Wounded Knee Massacre politically altered the relationship between American Indians and the US government with long lasting repercussions. The massacre took place roughly one hundred years before the AIM was formed , on December 29, 1890, as the last battle of the American Indian war, a massacre took place at the Lakota Pine Ridge reservation near South Dakota. The US 7th Calvary intruded upon the reservation as a means to disarm the Lakota of their rifles. It is speculated that a deaf tribal man refused to give his rifle to American authorities, in response the Calvary point blank shot the man leading to chaos as the few Lakota warriors shot out as a defense mechanism before they were quickly outnumbered. (Nelson) The definition of a massacre is a killing of many unresisting human beings under circumstances of aristocracy. The incident at Wounded Knee is...
Throughout history the attacks on Native American sovereignty proved to be too much and eventually tribes had to submit. The problems Native American tribes faced when fighting for and dealing with sovereignty in the 18th century are identical to the problems they are facing today. These
The movement westward during the late 1800’s created new tensions among already strained relations with current Native American inhabitants. Their lands, which were guaranteed to them via treaty with the United States, were now beginning to be intruded upon by the massive influx of people migrating from the east. This intrusion was not taken too kindly, as Native American lands had already been significantly reduced due to previous westward conquest. Growing resentment for the federal government’s Reservation movement could be felt among the native population. One Kiowa chief’s thoughts on this matter summarize the general feeling of the native populace. “All the land south of the Arkansas belongs to the Kiowas and Comanches, and I don’t want to give away any of it” (Edwards, 203). His words, “I don’t want to give away any of it”, seemed to a mantra among the Native Americans, and this thought would resound among them as the mounting tensions reached breaking point.
In Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, Dee Brown presents the Indian point of view of the conflict caused by westward American settlement during the late nineteenth century. The book is meant to be a counterpoint to the historical portrayal of Native Americans as warmongering savages. It also depicts the American government and citizens not as heroic practitioners of Manifest Destiny, but selfish oathbreakers who were willing to take by force what wasn’t theirs. Brown’s writing illustrates how history is indeed written by the victor by telling the past through the eyes of a defeated people. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee also emphasizes the prejudice felt during the late 1800s against non-whites and which continues to be a problem in contemporary
"Massacre At Wounded Knee, 1890." Massacre At Wounded Knee, 1890. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 Jan.
In the beginning of the film there is a sit down conversation between Sitting Bull and General Sherman. They have a heated encounter about the other Indian tribes that have forfeited their lands and have gone to the reservation. Sitting Bull refuses to give up his people’s land and warns General
Brown, Dee, Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West, New York, Bantam Press,1970
Native Americans faced many struggles in their efforts of achieving the “American Dream.” Shortly after the West became open for settlement, American discovery of some 350,000 Native Americans proved to be a problem for western settlers. Reservations were set up in North Dakota and Oklahoma in 1867 for Native Americans to live in, keeping western lands free of Native Americans. However, these two states in particular lacked soil rich enough to sustain plains Indians farming attempts. Even more, a gold strike in 1870 that brought whites to move into the reservations caused fights between Native Americans and whites. What most injured the Native American peoples was the near extinction of buffalo, a prime source of food, clothing, and tools for many of the Plains Indians. Buffaloes near extinction were, in part, due to Plains Indians overhunting them as a resource. But, in a strategy to further displace and weaken Native Americans, the army began killing millions of bu...
The images come to my mind is the only native people in America is American Indians, all of other is immigrants. It is positive, because most people immigrants to America in the hope that to pursuing high-quality life and their children can receive better Education. Which means America is better than other country in grantee in a better future. And having more smart and skilled people coming to America, can let America be
“In great Sila, or high on Taburnus, two bulls have locked horns in mortal combat. The keepers fall back in fear, and the cattle stand in silent dread, the heifers ...