Nationalism Dbq

In 1815 The Battle of New Orleans was fought, became the largest battle of the war of 1812, and was won by Andrew Jackson. From that time he was recognized as a national hero for winning such a huge war, even though the Treaty of Ghent was the armistice which had ended the War of 1812, and was signed earlier than when The Battle of New Orleans occurred. The Product of The War of 1812 was nationalism. “America may not have fought the war as one nation, but it emerged as one nation.” (“Nascent Nationalism”). American art and literature had developed and proceeded to show that nationalism began. “Washington Irving and James Fenimore Cooper attained international recognition in the 1820s, significantly as the nation’s first writers of importance to use American scenes and themes” (“Nascent Nationalism”). American authors had begun to receive equal attention to European writers, and were capable of achieving the level of writing only European authors were recognized as having. “Irving’s Bracebridge Hall (1822) received at least 32 reviews in the British press, equaling the attention given the work of the two most popular British authors, Byron and Scott.” (Eaton).

Nationalism had a vital role to play in the build up in the World Was One, as different nations sought to impose their authority on the rest of the world. Na...

Case in point, the Poles in interwar Poland would be the core nation. From this example, the nationalizing nationalism is the practice of institutional policies put forth by the core nation, in this case the Poles. These policies would directly benefit the core nation’s population, usually at the expense (either intentionally or unintentionally) of the national minorities. In direct opposition to the nationalizing nationalism is homeland nationalism. Homeland nationalism claims the protection and support of nationals abroad or living as a national minority population in another nation, within Brubaker’s cases, these nations were usually undergoing nationalizing nationalism. As nationalizing nationalism threatened the rights and livelihood of the national minorities, those national minorities who can be claimed as part of a different nation and then supported by that nation abroad are under the influence of homeland nationalism. To keep with the example of Poland, the German population within Poland, which is not the core nation, but a national minority, would receive support from the nation of the same national origin of the national minority in question, in this case Germany, often in opposition to the policies of the nationalizing nationalism. While these two types of nationalisms are eternally in opposition to one another leading to conflict, there is also the third type of nationalism that is in opposition to nationalizing nationalism and homeland nationalism, and that is the national minorities. National minorities refer to those populations within a nation that are not the core nation. While this definition does include the national minorities under the protection of homeland nationalism, if there is no homeland to enact homeland nationalism, or the homeland is unable or unwilling to provide homeland nationalism, the national minorities

Albert Einstein once stated, “Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind.” Often times, nationalism causes specific leaders to impose particular ideologies onto their individuals. In many different regions, such as the Dominican Republic, the nature of nationalism varies on how the patriotic sentiment is imposed and who enforces the nationalistic pride. The ideologies imposed by one nation may, in addition, resemble the history of another nation, causing certain countries to remind others of their pasts. Dictators, such as Rafael Trujillo, promoted nationalism by imposing the importance of particular ideologies that are seen in the history the United States. Throughout The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Diaz, masculinity is the foremost ideology enforced by Rafael Trujillo onto the Dominican Republic. The severity of the implication of certain ideologies, such as masculinity, may not precisely reflect other nations, but the impact that these ideologies have on individuals does. Allowing the imposition of nationalism to enforce ideas of certain ideologies that reflect those of other nations may cause disease among mankind with ideologies that will never diminish. Nationalism seems to plague specific nations by allowing them to demonstrate inimical qualities that were present in the history of other nations, creating “demon children” that will often reflect the negative ideologies of other nations.

Nationalism is having ultimate pride for one’s country and believing one’s country stands higher than all other countries. The spread of nationalism obtains a crucial step for leaders to create a genocide since the leaders require the essential addition of support from their own society before a disposition can exist or commence implication. Giving people an enormous sense of pride for their country and that if one truly loves their country they will ensure anything to preserve its greatness. Jews and Tutsis were considered threats and diseases in Germany and Rwanda, and such diseases should cease to exist in order for the nation to reign supreme. Influential leaders gain support from their nations peoples with their intensity towards their country, brainwashing them into the same ideology as them. Leaders create a state in which “non-threatening” citizens become conflicted with their human emotions and what their country asks of them. Jews and Tutsis come to be situated further segregated and the majority of people belonging in the superior group remain loyal to their nation. Nationalism helps a nation’s society with the transitioning into genocide, since when leaders proceed actively in their mass murdering blue prints, common people have already turned their back onto the minorities

The emergence of nations marked the beginning of radical socio-econonomic changes in the life of the Europeans. New economic relations culminated in the Industrial Revolution which introduced mass production of goods, and the overflow of productive forces facilitated the expansion of the bourgeoisie as well as the formation of a new social class – the proleteriat. Changes in the ideological, political, and psychological sphere led to serious destabilization, disorientation, and uncertainty in the society. As a result, new concepts had to be forged to replace the old ones. I believe one of the most important is that of a nation 's culture: a culture that connects and permeates all members of the same nation. It is obvious that this concept is very similar to that based on linguistic unity because a common language is the most authentic feature of social identity and, undoubtedly, a major prerequisite for the existence of a unique culture.

Nationalism is more than just a sense of pride in one’s country. Nationalism is what makes you feel like part of something bigger. In order to be a nation, its people should willingly make sacrifices to benefit the country, not just the individual. Many factors like common culture, language, geographic location, and shared history are all important contributors to nationalism. Nationalism can possess great power, that is capable of either uniting or dividing nations. As nationalism flourished in Europe during the 1800’s, it unified separate Italian and German city-states, and divided previously great powers like the Ottoman Empire and Austrian Empire.

Each people has their own unique identity formed by cultural, religious, and linguistic differences, and some cultural are filling to fight to remain unique. Johann Gottfried von Herder, a late 16th century German philosopher famous for writing Materials for the Philosophy of the History of Mankind. In an excerpt for his book, that inspired nationalist ideas, Herder says the “great injury to a nation is the lose of her national character” (Doc. 5). Giuseppe Mazzini, was the founder of an Italian

Nationalism means is a country that feels they have superiority over other countries.In document one, a British imperial poet talks about how citizens should praise their own country, and that nationalism is for the greater cause of the country. In document 6, Count Cavour, explains “The history of every age proves that no people can attain a high degree of intelligence and morality unless its feeling of nationality is strongly developed.” As nationalism was growing in Europe, it gave many citizens in different countries confidence for their military strength, and government. Also, many countries wanted to industrialize. With countries having confidence with themselves, European countries grew their basic needs, military and

Nationalism occurs when a nation wants to unify into one, or is owned by another large empire, they all band together to defeat, and fight for their freedoms. Wanting freedom, and your own culture, ethnic and religious group many nations feel that it’s significant that they have to represent themselves in government. Nationalism often encouraged feelings of hate for the group in control, Father Miguel Hidalgo grew support for a revolution against Spain, and they fought against the Spaniards, they want to recover the lands stolen by them, and kill the enemies of the rebellion (Doc 8)

In 1989, reform groups throughout the Soviet bloc were seizing control of their governments, terminating over 40 years of communist rule. The communist regime in Romania was one of the last to collapse. Romania also experienced the most violent regime change and did not participate in any form of roundtable talks. Such a revolutionary beginning was in stark contrast to the reform movements and negotiations occurring in other Eastern European countries. Romania continued to differentiate itself from other Eastern European countries throughout the democratization process. All Eastern European countries faced a difficult path to democracy, but Romania in particular experienced an especially long transition riddled with corruption. Romania faced many challenges including a post-communist resurgence of nationalism and a struggle to elect democratic leaders following the 1989 revolution. I argue that while Romania continues to struggle with these challenges, Romania has made great progress towards overcoming them. My argument proceeds as follows. First, I examine the impact and reforms of Romania’s leaders from 1989 to 2014, recording Romania’s struggles with illiberal leaders. Second, I discuss the resurgence of ethnic nationalism following the Romanian revolution, documenting how leaders manipulated ethnic minorities and the response of the minority groups.

The Founding Fathers, in the 1700s, consisted of men looking to set up democracy and a structured government that would be successful in shaping America. In 1789, the first president of America, George Washington, delivered a speech to congress after taking an oath for the position of Presidency. In his famous speech, he urged Congress to add a set of rights (Bill of Rights) to the Constitution that would allow a sense of public unity and individual freedom/rights. He was a supporter of the people’s good. Washington declared, “I behold the surest pledges, that as on one side, no local prejudices, or attachments; no separate views, nor party animosities, will misdirect the comprehensive and equal eye which ought to watch over this great assemblage of communities and interests.”

The first problem concerts the generality of these theories. Although they provide a convincing explanation of nationalism, they are usually based on a level of abstraction that they cannot be easily applied to other areas or cases. They appear to cover many things but using them to locate historical instances often invokes outstanding circumstances such as religious factors, ethnic antagonism and colour. The second issue with modernist theories is that their materialism is quite misleading. This is because nationalism can exist in a wide range of socioeconomic settings ranging from rich settings to poor settings as well as in pre-industrialised and the industrialised conditions. It is also difficult to explain the intensity and the content of particular nationalism through the workings of global capitalism. The third and the most crucial problem with the modernist theories is the claim that nationalism is a product of modernisation. This claim overlooks ethnic and cultural ties in most parts of the world and the significance of these factors.

Nationalism is where countries have so much pride in themselves that if they were insulted they would not back down, this would cause a world war