Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Paying college athletes annotated bibliography
Student athletes should be paid
Impacts of sports on students’ lives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Paying college athletes annotated bibliography
According to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), for the year 2011- 2012 the NCAA revenue reached $871.6 million, most of which came from the rights agreement with Turner/CBS Sports. The NCAA is also forecasting that 2012- 2013, revenue is projected to be $797 million, with $702 million coming from the Association’s new rights agreement with CBS Sports and Turner Broadcasting. In taking a closer look at NCAA and their practices as it relates to the distribution of revenue, The President of the NCAA, Mark Emmert salary according to the association’s new federal tax return was, nearly $1.7 million dollars.
Consequently, most Executives and Coaches are highly rewarded through compensation for example, “Alabama's Nick Saban and Texas' Mack Brown has earnings that total an estimated $5.1- 6 million dollars.” Scholarships alone do not meet the requirements to help aid student athletes for an entire semester or year, therefore when all the funds are exhausted the student is left to figure out how to fund the next meal, with a complex season schedule it’s impossible for the individual to seek employment and NCAA prohibits the student athlete to rely on any other sources of income.
Taking a look at the amount of revenue college football players bring in for their University, many are living below the poverty line, even with the help of scholarships the amount after tuition, meal-plans and textbooks is just not accommodating. If you take a look at a Division I Scholarship, that comes to be about $25,000 dollars per year, now if you deduct from the amount left over which will account for the miscellaneous cost that will arise during the year scholarships alone do not meet the requirements to help aid student athletes. ...
... middle of paper ...
..., but it's wrong for me to get $20 to get something to eat? (Ganguli, 2013)” I agree that college athletes should be compensated within reason, compensation to help aid through those tough times when funds are no longer available. To help satisfy the requirements of the NCAA, by protecting the integrity of the program and keep the student players from being tempted to accept awards and sign autographs.
Works Cited
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/NCAA/Finances/Revenue http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9698504/arian-foster-says-took-benefits-playing-tennessee-volunteers Study:College Athletes Worth 6 Figures, Live Below Federal Poverty : www.ncpanow.org/news_articles http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/09/13/ncaa-rules-trap-many-college-athletes-in-poverty/ http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/6778847/college-athletes-deserve-paid
A very controversial issue in college athletics today is whether student athlete's academic goals or athletic events should be placed in higher importance. In our society today, many people people tend to think of highly renowned college athletes as athletes that dedicate all their time to the sport that they play. What many people tend to forget is that these college athletes have as large a responsibility in the classroom as they do playing football, basketball, baseball, volleyball, track and
International Paralympic Committee, or only a single sport at a national level, such as the Rugby Football League. National bodies may or may not be affiliated
the graduation rates of student-athletes over the general student body at different sized institutions throughout the country. Colleges around the country of all sizes regard graduation as the ending goal for each student-athlete. Graduation rates vary across divisions of athletics and tiers of academia. These variations in graduation rates raise the important question of what factors determine the graduation success of these athletes and their levels over the general student body. In this paper
scenes found around college campuses are athletic events, but where would these college sports be without their dedicated athletes? Student athletes get a lot of praise for their achievements on the field, but tend to disregard the work they accomplish in the classroom. Living in a college environment as a student athlete has a great deal of advantages as well as disadvantages that affect education and anti-intellectualism. Around the country, college athletic programs are pushing their athletes more
Athletic programs have been a part of colleges for many years. It has led to most big name schools being popular because of these successful athletic programs. They draw in and attract students. They have the ability to create an atmosphere that nothing else can, while bringing an entire student body together. Athletic programs also allow for students to receive an education that typically would not be able to. Athletic programs are beneficial to colleges. Athletic programs give schools national
During the 1800s-1900s female athletes and students were considered less than men. They did not have the same equality as men! Title IX was made to correct these imbalances. The conflict was that gender equality was imbalanced and the compromise was that women eventually got more equality. The number of high school female athletes increased from 295,000 to more than 2.6 million college female athletes has increased from 30,000 to more than 150,000 (title IX enacted) Before Title IX women had
Since 1910, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has been the most dominant collegiate athletic organization in the United States. Originally created to solidify the rules for the various sports of the time, this nonprofit association has grown to a combination of 1,281 conferences, organizations, institutions, and individuals. Based on the NCCA’s Constitution, the primary purposes of the organization is to promote intercollegiate athletics in the United States, to "maintain intercollegiate
There will always be debates on whether college athletes should be paid or not, but the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) came up with a fair and right way to award athletes for what they deserve. The beginning of the case study mentions that “The possibility of a future collegiate athletic scholarship was a motivating force to excel for many families and youth athletic competing in Pee Wee, Little League, middle school, and high school sports.” I agree with this statement considering
dedicated to sports? NCAA rules strictly prohibits players from being paid for all the hard work they do to protect “amateurism”, but are you really an amateur putting in over 40 hours a week between practice and other activities? Although students earn a college scholarship, that doesn’t cover living expenses, and access to a degree at the end of their career, players should be paid because schools, coaching staffs and major corporations are profiting off their free labor. The NCAA prides itself as
Both within and beyond their sport of choice, student athletes bring a tremendous amount of benefits to the institutions that they are a part of. The prospect of having a star athlete, for example, can be incredibly valuable to a university because of the wealth of opportunities that athlete can subsequently create. One of the most understated but undoubtedly influential factors in a potential student’s decision to attend any one university is the experience that the university can offer them. On-campus
leagues, winning is above all and being competitive is important for both coaches and administrators overall success. That is why college recruiting has so many ethical issues today. When universities are able to offer money and other incentives to student-athletes in order to persuade them to enroll with their institution it gives them an advantage some others are not able to offer. Gifting money, cars, clothing, houses, and sometimes even sex take place in order to sway an athlete to one’s school
college athletics has always been very prominent in the news. Most recently, members of the Northwestern University football team have joined together to start the first college sports union (Novy-Williams & Soshnick, 2014). Their goal is to obtain control over their collegiate athletic career, including what they believe are long overdue financial benefits. This case has reopened the longstanding debate concerning whether or not college athletes should be paid. The History of College Athletics The
not see the negative effects of the payments. The payments of college athletes could cause their price of enrollment to rise, forcing many students to transfer to other universities or not attend college at all. It may also cause fan ratings to drop because the relatability factor would disappear. Along with university budget cuts appearing, academic scholarships and athletic scholarships would disappear. College athletes should not be paid because college athletes are students and not professional
The college athletics industry has had an impact within the American society for almost one hundred seventy-five years, starting with its oldest university, Harvard, which came into competition with Yale (Smith, 2000). These types of competition caused questionable ethics on both sides from unclear academic status of players to excessive rewarding, including an example of an athlete receiving commissions of cigarette sales through the American Tobacco Company. In the early 1900s the Intercollegiate
College athletics have gained immense popularity among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted in increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the participating colleges which has fuelled the debate of whether college athletes are allowed to be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. The debate as to whether or not college athletes must be paid has really been cooking up over the past recent years. It seems to arise every March when the NCAA Men's