The national minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) of The United States is twenty-one and it is ineffective; therefore it should be lowered to eighteen. The minimum legal drinking age does not prevent underage consumption of alcohol. Lowering the age of consumption can possibly reduce the number of injuries do to underage drinking. The legal age of adulthood in the United States is eighteen, so all adults should be able to make their own decision to drink or not. “Although many believe that anyone under the age of 21 is prohibited from consuming alcohol in the United States, underage drinking is allowed in 29 states if done on private premises with parental consent, 25 states if for religious purposes, and 11 states if for educational purposes.” ("Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered from 21 to a Younger Age?").
The purpose of having an MLDA is to prevent underage consumption of alcohol, but the current age has been proven to have little effect on the matter. Teenagers have many ways of obtaining alcoholic beverages such as using fake identification cards and getting an older friend or family member to buy it for them. The methods used to purchase alcohol have been successful; teenagers account for twenty-two and a half billion dollars of consumer spending for alcohol in the United States.” ("Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered from 21 to a Younger Age?"). The thrill of breaking the law and being defiant is thrilling to young adults, so raising the age or restricting them from a right they should have is not helping the problem of underage drinking, but encouraging it. While it can be said that the legal age is twenty-one and it prohibits teenagers from purchasing and consuming alcohol publicly, it remains a fact that the teenagers do...
... middle of paper ...
...ble decisions, yet they are allowed to dedicate their life to serving the country in the military and take part in the voting process for the representatives of the government. Most people would agree those are difficult, life-changing, and stressful decisions. Lowering the MLDA is not only smart and safe, but it is fair.
The minimum legal drinking age of twenty-one is ineffective and should be lowered to eighteen years of age. If eighteen year olds are legally adults, then they should be able to have all the privileges that accompany adulthood. The current MLDA encourages underage drinking and puts them at risk of hurting themselves and others which is contradictory to its objective.
"Drinking Age." 15 Oct 2013. Procon, Online Posting to Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered from 21 to a Younger Age?. Web. 4 Dec. 2013. .