Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of french revolution in europe
10 impacts of feudalism in europe
Rise of Napoleon and reforms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of french revolution in europe
It is an indisputable fact that Napoleon Bonaparte greatly changed Europe. It is my position that he was a hero, and changed it for the better. Although I certainly do not agree with some of the methods that he brought about this change, I still agree with the change he wrought. Through him, the era of democracy was ushered in. He helped bring back a basic human right, being that all men are created equal. Nationalism was sparked, feudalism was overthrown, and Europe was modernized. Napoleon changed Europe, and it was a change for the good. Napoleon Bonaparte was a dictator, so you may wonder why I say he helped usher in the era of democracy. Although the people did not vote for him, through conquering nations he spread the French culture, and with that, the ideas of the French Revolution. The people of the nations in Europe saw that they could revolt, like France, and create a democratic government in their country. He saw the faults with aristocracy, and knew that it was bound to fall. We can see that he hardly wasn’t even fighting for land with the example of Russia. He was not content to take the land, he wanted the Tsar, and his position. This is what lead to his downfall, but we see his true purposes through it. He was in it not to expand borders, but to overthrow aristocracies. He showed the people …show more content…
Or perhaps the nations would have risen up on their own, seeing the example of France. Who knows what the results of this could have been. One comment on a story I read while researching had the following excerpt. “Change is always accompanied with pain.” The rich aristocrats would have never given up there spot in society willingly. Lives would have undoubtedly been required for change in the system. We can only wonder how many lives would have been required in what would have been bloody uprisings to overthrough corrupt governments for
Napoleon just maintains the goals of the French Revolution since he needed to secure and reinforce his own energy. Amid his ascent to power, Napoleon stuck to the goals obediently. In his discourse to his troops, Napoleon said, "We are taking up arms as liberal foes, and we wish just to squash the despots who subjugate [the Italian people]" (Document 1). He instructs them to be deferential of different nations, to give them rights they have the privilege to appreciate. This takes after Locke's illumination thoughts, that everybody has natural rights that can't be taken away.
people would stand up for their rights and try to shed light on these issues, along
How much does Napoleon owe to the French Revolution? Without the French Revolution, there would be no Napoleon. Napoleon’s life was forever affected and directed by the revolution in France. His relationship with France was complex, even from the very beginning of his life. Taking a path that began with his ultimate goal of ejecting France from his homeland of Corsica to ruling the nation he had so dearly despised.
The Napoleonic Era (1799-1815), began when France was amidst a revolution, in it, they were fighting to free themselves from a monarchical rule in favor of a democratic leadership. However, this rebellion prompted much conflict with many of their neighboring European powers, as said countries felt as though their rule was threatened by the increase of enlightenment ideas. Consequently, the turmoil which was occurring both on and off of France’s territory gave Napoleon the opportunity to seize power. Due to Napoleon’s military expertise, France was rapidly expanding their borders and inserting their dominance over Europe. This yielded an unexpected result; nationalistic pride began rising and engulfing much of Europe. To an extent, Napoleon did contribute to the influx of nationalism in Europe, albeit mostly unintentionally. Nationalism is now described as an individual’s loyalty and devotion to one’s own country. The aspects of Napoleon’s rule which had the greatest influence on the increase of Nationalism include; the Napoleonic Code, France’s treatment of their territories, and the
Napoleon was a military general that participated in multiple war victories. His interests included history, law, and mathematics. His strengths as a leader benefitted in planning financial, legal, and military plans. His aspiring attitude made him believe he was destined to be the savior of France (Coffin & Stacey, 494). He favored a republic over a constitutional monarchy. When Napoleon came to power, he immediately consolidated personal power by overthrowing the five-man Directory and created a Republic. Napoleon used his status and power during the Revolution to bring out and surface Revolution ideals and help his people. Napoleon’s role in European history was the savior of the French Revolution due to the fact he accomplished most objectives that the people hoped for. Goals of the French Revolution included overthrowing the old regime of an absolute monarch, write a basic and worthy constitution, and give more rights to the third estate and limit the first and second estates power in the Estates-General.
...ig concepts, such as equality before the law, but he also did what would benefit his country. It is important to understand that since France had just exited a revolution, it was pretty fragile; one big mistake and France might have ended up in another one. Napoleon was not only a child of both the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, he was also a very intelligent person. His cunning and his wits led him to be one of the greatest, if not the greatest enlightened despot of all time.
Napoleon and the Enlightenment The enlightenment was a time of great learning throughout Europe during the eighteenth century. Although the period is significant for scientific and other scholastic advancements, it is most important because it allowed for the opening of great minds—such as that of Napoleon Bonaparte. Shortly after this enlightenment made its way through Europe, revolution and civil war ripped through France between 1879 and 1899. The unrest of the time called for a strong ruler.
Napoleon was not only a great leader, he was also a military genius. As a military genius, Napoleon won many battles to expand France and was always welcomed back to France as a hero. His use of strategic warfare throughout many battles allowed him to be seen as a hero not only in France but all of Europe. Although his army was outnumbered by the Russians and Austrians on December 2, 1805, Napoleon's brilliant strategies resulted in a defeat of the opposing armies in the Battle of Austerlitz.
French Revolution brought a great number of great ideas, but ideas are not beneficial unless they are realized and stabilized. The man to stabilize the concepts of French Revolution was Napoleon Bonaparte. He started out as an Italian general and ended up being one of the greatest historical figures. First, Directors requested Napoleon's support while organizing a coup d'etat. Then, Bonaparte fought Britain in order to benefit France. Lastly, he was called to help creating a new constitution and ended up as the First Consul of France. At home, he ruled using flattery, but also he strongly resisted the opposition. Napoleon is a pro-revolutionist because he denied all the privileges of the aristocracy, created a new constitution, and also established the Napoleonic Code.
The French Revolution could not have made a better time for Napoleon to rise to the top. It was a time of chaos and weakness in Europe and Napoleon being an opportunist took the opening to gain as much power as he could. He saw France as a source of power and not his country for he had none. Seeming heartless, Napoleon did not believe in religion, democracy ...
...arly successes and his military brilliance classifies him as a hero in this sense. His political reign was also one of debate. Although he awarded many rights, he challenged them with other restrictions. Overall, France was stable following the horrid Reign of Terror but it also awarded more rights than in the old regime. Finally, the social aspect of France could prove Bonaparte to be either heroic or tyrannical as well. Many social changes transgressed during his reign. For instance, there was an increase in education and an end to feudalism, however Napoleon ruled the imperial catechism and was emperor for life. Overall the social changes were an improvement from the old regime, therefore classifying his as a hero for his time period. Overall, Napoleon was a hero in all three aspects of French life, although there were many aspects which were tyrannical as well.
Was Napoleon Bonaparte the Saviour or the Destroyer of the Ideals of the French Revolution?
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) was a military and political genius of historic proportions. As Emperor (self-proclaimed in 1804), he established a strong central administration and code of law, consolidating and institutionalizing many of the reforms of the French Revolution. More so than any former ruler, including Louis XVI, Maximilien Robespierre or the Directory, Napoleon brought stability where financial, political, and social turmoil had previously reigned. War had plunged the country into debt and brought about an economic recession. The middle class, or the bourgeoisie, felt strangulation by the nobility and the clergy, preventing them from progressing socially or politically. During the ten years of the revolution, the political systems in France were replaced with an ever-changing series of governments. None lasted for more than a few years.