My Central Argument Analysis

405 Words1 Page

My central argument is financial crisis in developing countries. I am going to argue that developing countries need more funding and the ways other countries could help developing countries improve financially. The types of arguments I would use to support my claim is proposal argument and argument of fact. For example, proposal argument simply follow the problem-solution method to give a description of the existing problem, however, argument of fact when the author wants to challenge or change people’s beliefs. I choose both of those arguments, because both arguments gives readers a clear view of what I plan to accomplish. Financial crisis is a an problem every country faces. Unfortunately, developing countries faces financial crisis the most. …show more content…

Furthermore, financial crisis plays a huge role in impacting the economy, according to Dirk Velde, “the economic impacts could include weaker export revenues, lower investments and growth rates, lost employment” (Velde, 2008). In addition, financial crisis impacts the social life of citizens, causing citizens to be mentally and emotionally drained. For example, Velde also states, “there could be social effects…lower growth translating into higher poverty, more crime, weaker health systems and even more difficulties” (Velde, 2008). However, studies have shown that there are ways developing countries could overcome their financial crisis. In better words, developing countries could cut down on their spending and reduce the number of trades, are two ways developing countries could overcome their financial crisis. Luckily, other countries could help developing countries prosper as well. According to Nancy Birdsall, Dan Rodrik, and Aevind Suramanian

Open Document