Parmigiano Cheese Case Study

1434 Words3 Pages

Assignment #2 1. (A) Yes, an acceptance for the offer was communicated between Margaret and Frank. Margaret saw Frank’s offer for the lawn mower, and Margaret said that she would buy it for the asking price of $200. Since Margaret did not bargain for another price, and used the words “I will,” she indicated that she accepted the offer that Frank had originally advertised. A contract was also formed between both parties when Margaret accepted the offer. In order for a contract to be enforceable, both participants need to have the capacity to enter into a contract. The parties must not be minors, mentally incapable individuals and intoxicated at the time of forming the contract. Margaret and Frank were presumably mentally competent adults, …show more content…

A) Monteverdi could seek the following damages for the scenario in question 2: compensatory damages, so that Monteverdi can be reimbursed for the amount she spent on the cheese. In addition, Monteverdi could sue for monetary loss. Monteverdi ran a catering business and a gourmet shop, her business ran on selling only organic food. The purchase of the cheese which was not high quality, would have gone to waste. Previously, Monteverdi gave Malvezzi specific instructions about the grade of cheese that she wanted. Monteverdi may argue that the same implied terms applied to the purchase of the Parmigiano cheese. If this was the case, Monteverdi would also be able to sue for liquidated damages due to Malvezzi breaching the contract they had in place. Finally, Monteverdi has the option of seeking damages for fraudulent misrepresentation. The elements of fraudulent misrepresentations were, 1) a representation was made, 2) it was false, 3), the person who made the representation knew it was false, 4) the plaintiff (Monteverdi) relied on the statements, 5) the plaintiff sued for damages. Malvezzi knew that the cheese he sold to Monteverdi was not the quality she expected, yet he sold it to her in order to keep Monteverdi’s …show more content…

Antoinette and Valjean formed a contract which involved Antoinette’s selling of the Vespa. The contract was enforced because they both had the contractual capability, because both parties were in sound mind and over the age of 18. Also, the contract was not criminal or intended to be harmful to anyone. Finally, there was consensuses between both parties about the price of the car. Antoinette broke the consensus of the contract when she withdrew it last minute and was therefore not intending to perform all elements of the

More about Parmigiano Cheese Case Study

Open Document