Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
debate on global warming
debating topics global warming
debate of global warming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: debate on global warming
The movie entitled “An Inconvenient Truth” is based on a cosmopolitan problem about global warming. Mr. Al Gore uses a lot of catastrophic videos to remind us the harm and damage of global warming. At the end of the movie, he illustrates some misconceptions and appeals to everyone to pay more attention to the current environment phenomenon. He thinks everyone has responsibility to protect our planet. First, Mr. Al Gore shows some global warming comparison pictures of places over several years. Some rivers become droughty, some snow mountains are melted, some glaciers retreat year by year. Some places depend on the melt water coming off the glaciers, so glaciers are very important. In the following years, because of global warming, many people …show more content…
Owing to the relationship between carbon dioxide with temperature, people can foresee the future temperature’s tendency if we do not take any measures to prevent it. From EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), there is a chart about how do human activities influence the U.S. carbon dioxide concentration. U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions, By …show more content…
Al Gore describes the collision between the civilization and the earth. There’re three factors causing the situation. The first is population. With the growth of population, more food, water and other resources are demanded. Human’s activities cause the earth worse. The second factor is the scientific and technology revolution. It not only brings us benefits but also gives us responsibilities to think what the consequences if we use them. And the last factor is that we should look at how we think about it. We should realize that we are in what kind of situation today. Mr. Al Gore also tells that there are some misconceptions. The first misconception is that there is disagreement about the science, it has been deliberately created by a small group of people. And the second misconception that do we have to choose the economy and the environment? There are many contradictions between profits and environment. Many people only purse their own benefits even to destroy the ecology by any kinds of means. There are many examples to prove it. Burning fossil fuels and clearing forests not only bring people benefits but also cause the increase of carbon dioxide. In discussion the damage of the people’s activity and selfness, a lot of people notice that our nature resource become less. People should be aware that we should balance the benefits and environment and never take some misconceptions for
A similar message that appears in his book that appeared in the aforementioned speech was the impact of the media speculation. The book addresses this in two examples. One was presented with the news of a lawsuit that an island called Vantu would file against the EPA; yet the lawsuit would never move forward due to it only serving a purpose to launder money and raise awareness to global warming that was never proven to affect the island. The other was shown to be environmental scientist who received their funding from environmental organizations, such as NERF in the book. These scientists would often have to go against their findings and report what the organizations wanted them to, or possibly lose their funding. Additionally, the book profoundly took opposition to the claim of global warming. This is presented in the form of the main character, Peter Evans, who has been manipulated into believing everything that the media has told him about global warming. It isn’t until John Kenner is introduced, that Peter begins got learn the truth about global warming. The author uses specific evidence to back his claims, specifically he uses a wide array of resources to verify his claim that Antarctica is not in fact melting, but getting colder and thickening. Furthermore, another essential concept that that book introduces is environmental extremists, or bioterrorism. These characters in the book would stop at nothing to make sure that everyone believed in global warming, and tried to destroy parts of the world to succeed in their mission. Bioterrorists are best represented as a warning of what could happen if people continue to buy into the media’s lies without having conclusive evidence to back up their
Even though Gore in the film says about the global warning that “this is really not a political issue, so much as a moral issue,” I believe that it is as much a political issue as it is a moral issue. The truth about the global warming is inconvenient to many economically developed countries.
According to the World Bank’s report, climatologists predict greenhouse gases will cause temperatures to rise 7.2 degrees before the next century (par. 8). While the rise in temperature might seem trivial, Scranton elaborates on the detrimental effects this change would cause by quoting James Clapper. Mr. Clapper, the director of national intelligence, argues that extreme weather disasters will “increasingly disrupt food and energy markets, exacerbating state weakness, forcing human migrations, and triggering riots, civil disobedience, and vandalism” (par. 7). Dr. Scranton mentions these sources in order to convince the audience that an increase of only a few degrees can have a devastating impact that will inevitably leave the planet radically different during this epoch; the current epoch we live in, named the Anthropocene, is a term invented by geologist and scientists for the epoch that is “characterized by the arrival of the human species as a geological force” (par. 10). The name of the epoch inspired Scranton to title the article “Learning How to Die in the Anthropocene” since it reaffirms his claim that we must accept that the future will not be the same as the present. Furthermore, Scranton includes a book in his article written by geophysicist David Archer incase readers remain skeptical of the scientific evidence with
In the movie there have been several arguments which project that human induced climate change is actually happening. Some of them are listed below:
In its place we are entering a period of consequences." According to the facts that were mentioned by Al Gore in the film, I believe we are already living in the period of consequences. He said “carbon dioxide have never gone above 300 PPM,” but according to NOAA most recent global monthly mean of CO2 in September 2015 was 397.08 PPM. Due to such climate change, most recently the world has experienced most severe natural disasters, even in places where normally such disasters are not expected and abnormal. Also, in the last quarter century 30 new diseases were emerged even deadly like Ebola. “We don 't have that luxury anymore. We didn 't ask for it, but here it is” (Al Gore). We don’t neither do animals. A scientific study shows that polar bears are drowning in the Arctic Ocean and that has never happened before. Due to swimming long distances, up to 60 miles, and without finding the ice that they depend on for resting, they
Gore’s logical appeals emphasize the danger and significance of global warming in a cogent, engaging multimedia platform. Rather than monotonously expounding upon detail after detail, he uses interactive visual aids to clarify his claims. As Stefan Lovgren, in “Al Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Truth’ Movie: Fact or Hype?,” abbreviates, “the documentary handles the science well.” Gore is confident in the delivery of his information; he talks to his audience with ease and precision. He states, “[t]he relationships are actually very complicated, but there is one relationship that is far more powerful than all the others and it is this: When there is more carbon dioxide...
People are responsible for higher carbon dioxide atmosphere emissions, while the Earth is now into the Little Ice Age, or just behind it. These factors together cause many years discussions of the main sources of climate changes and the temperature increasing as a result of human been or natural changes and its consequences; even if its lead to the global warming, or to the Earth’s cooling. In their articles, “Global Warming Is Eroding Glacial Ice” by Andrew C. Revkin and “Global Warming Is Not a Threat to Polar Ice” by Philip Stott, both authors discuss these two theories (Revkin 340; Stott 344). Revkin is right that global warming is taking place. Significant increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to human activities combined with natural factors such as volcanic emissions and solar radiation – all together they lead to climate changes and temperatures rising. At the same time, other factors such as deforestation contribute to environmental changes for some glaciers not less than air pollution. However, during global warming not all regions of the planet are affected in the same way, local warming and cooling are both possible during these changes.
Glaciers conserve climate records just as tree trunks preserve historical climate levels from hundreds of years ago. Researchers are able to pull out the core of glaciers in order to examine the ancient bubbles. These ancient bubbles contain levels of carbon dioxide content and past air that is from our ancestors. What they found was atmosphere dioxide never being higher than 280 parts per million. Now, atmosphere dioxide has raised to 390 parts per million within a matter of a couple of years. This change has already been affecting us. James Balog states that air is changing and basic physics of air is changing. This particular change has a great influence in: plants, animals, food, water sources, weather, and mankind. All species are endangered at this moment. All species are going into a mass extinction due to hot weather and climate change. James Balog states that we will lose half or three quarters within the next 20 years. The plants at risk will cause our air to be unfiltered. These plants are what keep our water and air clean. There is also high mortality in forest areas with larger forest fires that are almost impossible to control. More extreme fires are burning which is the cause of extreme changes in the environment. Our environment is more extreme since the greenhouse gases are raising at deadly
This movie demonstrated the effects of global warming by setting a scenario where a second ice age had occured because of societies poor protection of the earth. One way this movie proved itself to be influential to society so they can learn from their mistakes, is through the box office earnings. The movie made major sales on opening weekend with over $68,000,000 earned in ticket sales. The movies domestic total gross was $186,740,799 (“The Day After Tomorrow”, boxofficemojo.com). The fact that the movie made so many sales, shows that it had quite a good reputation during the time period which means people enjoyed it. This proves that this left an impact in people’s lives which eventually led others to watch it also. Another reason is that Yale researchers, explained how The Day After Tomorrow also helped increase awareness on climate change, and encouraged people to consider how their actions could help create a similar environmental crisis as described in the movie. A survey was taken and people who did and did not watch the movie, were asked how likely do they think that certain events in the movie will occur in the next 50 years due to global warming. 80% of the people who watched it agreed there would be more intense storms. 40-66% of the people who watched the movie believed in food shortages, flooding, disease, and a new ice age. The percentages of the people who didn’t watch the movie were almost 10% lower in all the categories (“The Day After Tomorrow”, weforum.org). This itself compares people who were influenced by the movie, versus people who were not because they did not see it. People had a stronger feeling and thought that if the environment is not properly taken care of, scenarios created in the movie would come true. This shows how a simple film was able to allow the audience to learn from mistakes they are
All of these things are happening due to human’s greedy actions and pollution. As a society, we need to band together to save our Earth. My family and I have taken many trips to Catalina Island over my lifetime and I have personally seen the increase of water levels. Caves that were easily accessible are now SCUBA diving locations. This is changing the ecosystems in the oceans, which have a large impact on our lifestyle. There are so many small things people can do to change these detrimental effects, including taking shorter showers, using a broom instead of a hose to clean a driveway, and buying energy efficient appliances and cars to lower carbon dioxide. If everyone made a small change toward sustainability, our environment and atmosphere would have an exponential decrease in global warming and temperature. After watching this film, I realized that I need to pull my weight and work to decrease my carbon footprint. I did not realize how much of an impact my daily habits have on the Earth and how easily I can change
I was moved by Gore’s powerful presentation, and have great respect for the scientists who have clearly shown me the consequences and potential impacts global warming has and will have on the environment. Global warming is not some simply some theory about greenhouse gasses, but is a statement of fact. Earth’s environment has changed at an alarming pace over the last few decades, and these changes have been measured in an objective manner. Scientific observation is unbiased and objective , and from the small taste of scientific observation that Gore provided in An Inconvenient Truth it is now obvious to me that global warming is a severe and imminent threat. However, it is possible for us the stop the damage. We have the technology to do so, and the responsibility to take care of the only planet we call home.
People say you don’t know what you have until it’s gone. Truth is, you know what you had, you just never thought you would lose it. The theme for the documentary “The Inconvenient Truth” by Al Gore and the article “Warm, Warmer, Warmest” by Kristof, revolves around trying to bring awareness on global warming and how it is human responsibility to act in attempt to stop global warming as much as they are provoking it. The purpose for both is to attempt to wake up the people about global issues. Both of their audiences involve everyone considering that humans are responsible for the on-going issue. For “The Inconvenient Truth” the tone tends to be serious but not as aggressive as it was for “Warm, Warmer, Warmest”. Al Gore in his presentation
Subpoint A: Not long ago, a documentary film called “An Inconvenient truth” came out in 2006. This film raised international public awareness of climate change and reenergizing the environmental movement. A former U.S Vice president Al Gore campaigned to educate citizens about global warming through a simp...
Gore, Al. The Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do about It. New York: Rodale, 2006. Print.
As Robert Frost once said, “ Some say the world will end in fire, some say in ice. From what I’ve tasted of desire I hold with those who favor fire.” This excerpt can relate to the idea of global warming. Global warming can be defined as an increase in the earth's average atmospheric temperature that causes corresponding changes in climate and that may result from the greenhouse effect. During the past 10,000 years the earth has been in an ever-growing cycle that has significantly changed the climate. These changes are becoming more prevalent in our world today in the past 150 years. Scientists have been analyzing the causes and effects of the greenhouse effect and many other issues that global warming has presented. As John Houghton states in his book, Global Warming the Complete Briefing, on page 2 “ The 1980s and 1990s were unusually warm. Globally speaking, the decades have been the warmest since accurate records began somewhat over a hundred years ago and these unusually warm years are continuing into the twenty-first century.” There are countless records that show that our world as a whole is getting warmer, and the facts cannot be disputed. Everyone in the world today is experiencing the effects of global warming. These effects might be small now, but if we don’t protect our planet now then the consequences will greatly be increased.