Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stories' analysis
There are many stories and movies that you are able to be compared and contrasted because of there similar and different ideas. High Noon and The Most Dangerous Game have many differences and similarities that you can compare and contrast. An example would be how the characters take place in similar situations such as being hunted down. Both stories take place in the early 1900's such as 1924 and 1952. Both of these stories have differences such us the plot which brings each story to their differences. Another situation which both of the stories are similar in is the setting. The setting is set with isolation and in the middle of nowhere which gives these stories something to compare about and the events that take place. Overall each story …show more content…
is special in their own way, but can be relatable during some points. Both High Noon and The Most Dangerous Game have a large difference in the plot. This would be some of the large and main events that arrived during each of these stories. Each plot difference is how the story may start out or may be the conclusion of the story. "Seems to me people ought to be alone when they get married"(Foreman 291). Will Kane and Amy got married during this time which is one of the main parts that took place in the beginning of the story. Later on there marriage will have a huge impact and may even save Kane's life. "The cry was pinched off short as the blood-warm waters of the Caribbean Sea dosed over his head"(Connell). During this quote it explains the tragedy of Rainsford falling off the boat. He lays down in the Caribbean Sea left by his shipmates and without anywhere to go besides ship-trap island. Both of these events are different to each in many ways but play a huge role in the growth of each story. An example of similarities between each of these stories would be the roles of the main characters.
Each character is unique in their own way but are involved in many similar scenarios that brings them alike. Both Kane and Rainsford are being hunted down and face a life or death situation. They will have to use their brains and figure out a way to outsmart their opponent. "You'll never hang me! I'll be back! I'll kill you, Kane! I swear it, I'll kill you!"(Foreman 297). Kane faces a situation where he will need to bring the bad guys to justice. The bad guys hate him for it and later on want to get revenge for the stuff Kane has brought to them. Kane is wanted by Miller and his friends who are soon gonna come back to the town and hunt him down. This situation will cause Kane to think and outsmart his opponents during the battle. "I'll give him a trail to follow," muttered Rainsford, and he struck off from the rude path he had been following into the trackless wilderness. He executed a series of intricate loops; he doubled on his trail again and again, recalling all the lore of the fox hunt, and all the doges of the fox"(Connell). Rainsford faces the problem of being hunted down by General Zaroff which causes him to think of new things every second to outsmart Zaroff and to stay alive. In this quote Rainsford is using his knowledge of hunting and what he has learned so that Zaroff will have a harder time following him and that he will have a better chance at staying alive. Also both characters from the stories are being chased down and are wanted to be killed. Rainsford and Kane are both smart men who know how to outsmart others and stay
alive. The setting for each of these stories builds the main events that take place and are similar to one an other. Something to compare to each is how the setting for each character is isolated with no one to help and solve their problems that they need to face. Another example would be there surrounding area is out in the middle of no where where not many people take place in. "On the buckboard as it careens over the uneven plain, Kane keeping the horses at a wild gallop"(Foreman 293). For High Noon there is much open space without any building or people. The town he is in is very small and surrounded by the blazing desert. "Off there to the right--somewhere--is a large island," said Whitney." Its rather a mystery--"(Connell). Rainsford and Whitney spot and island which seems to be nothing besides plants and tree surrounded by water. When Rainsford arrived on the island he was surrounded by grass and a forest. Kane and Rainsford both face isolation and take place out in the middle of no where. Each of these stories have their own unique and separate story line, but also relate in many ways. For both stories they had there own different and interesting plots to start and end the story. Some of the similarities is how the characters feel and react to the situations they face and the way the respond and fight back. During each story they both are described as isolated and an empty area without many others around them for their support. Overall both stories are completely different but have many similar situations which make them capable to be compared and contrasted to one another with the situations that take place.
There are many similarities and differences between the story “The Most Dangerous Game” and the episode of Gilligan's Island that we watched. Some similarities include: someone is being hunted, the setting is similar, and both victims get away in the end. Some differences include: the moods of the stories, the strategies that are used by the huntees, and how the hunter got to the island.
The two story High Noon and "The Most Dangerous Game" are alike in some ways, but very different in many other ways also. High Noon is a story about an honest man named will khan; Who is a Marshall that has sent a prisoner to jail named frank Miller. Who has now come out of jail to get revenge on will. When will needs the towns people of hadleyville for help to defeat frank when he comes after will no one helps. In the other hand "The Most Dangerous Game" is about two very skilled hunter between Rainsford who get trapped on Ship-Trap island by Zaroff who owns the island. When Rainsford realizes what Zaroff hunts in his island he must leave as soon as possible. Zaroff tells Rainsford he could either hunt with him or against him.
The two short stories had many differences like time period, but had a huge common similarity, murder. The murder in the “Full Circle” was done out of jealousy and “The Most Dangerous Game” was done for sport. Some of the most
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” Connell uses foreshadowing to create suspense. For example, he uses the quotes “Who cares how a jaguar feels?” and “Bah! They’ve no understanding.” In these quotes, Rainsford is saying that the animals don’t feel anything when they are being hunted. He thinks it’s okay to hunt animals because they don’t understand what pain and fear feel like. These quotes foreshadow to when Rainsford actually experiences being hunted and he realizes that animals do feel pain and fear when hunted. Furthermore, he uses the quotes “He is a Cossack” and “So am I”. In these quotes, General Zaroff is hinting that he is a Cossack and may be a bit of a savage. These quotes foreshadow the fact
Where does the line of sport and murder intersect in hunting? Is it when the species being hunted is able to reason? Or is it when the species being hunted looks just like the hunter? In both movie and film, we see a man fight for his life and another going against all codes of ethics. While Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and Ernest B. Schoedsack’s film adaptation both have several similarities, the difference are also apparent in each respective media.
Initially in both stories there is an incident that traps a group of males in a secluded, unknown location. They are forced to work together to survive. As the stories progress we see an instance in each where someone threatens to kill another person. For example, in The 33, one man threatens to murder another man because he uses his iPod. One of the main differences we see is the outcome of the situations.
There are many similar between Zaroff and Gradwitz. Zaroff and Gradwitz both enjoyed hunting on their land. They both hunted human on their own land. In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game” and Saki’s “The Interlopers,” the main characters General Zaroff and Ulrich von Gradwitz are alike in the following ways: both me hunted on his own land, both men hunted, and both men owned land.
Those similarities and differences can be found anywhere when comparing and contrasting, especially when it is over two genres with a main topic. In the case of The Most Dangerous Game, the short story was more descriptive, informative, and did not stray far from the central theme of everything has feelings no matter what someone may think. “You have one the game.” Rainsford did not smile. “I am still a beast at
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
In the beginning of the story, Rainsford has a conversation with his friend, Whitney, about hunting animals. Rainford does not care about the animals that he hunts. He believes hunting is only a sport to kill innocent creatures. “‘Who cares how a jaguar feels?’” (1) Showing the reader exactly what he thinks of hunting. Rainsford does not understand that the animals he hunts are like the people that Zaroff hunts. They are innocent, and he is murdering them when he hunts them. Rainsford thinks that Zaroff is insane for murdering people, but Rainsford is also a murderer. When Zaroff hunts Rainsford, the protagonist realizes the terror and pain the jaguars must have felt when he hunted them. Now the roles are reversed, and Rainsford is the one being hunted. “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. The general was saving him for another day’s sport! Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.” (17) Rainsford has changed his feelings about hunting animals now, and he has become a better person. He now takes into account how his prey feels. His interactions with people will also be different, because instead of being extremely overconfident, he realizes that he is not perfectly adept at hunting, and everyone has feelings that matter. In conclusion, Rainsford is now more humble and less overconfident than he was when he began his
The underlying themes of the stories are l valid contrasts between the works. In some portions the themes are of the same facets, such as how in both books two men have a direct conflict between
In the first story i read the sound of thunder the technology was more advanced than the others i have read. Also in the second one i read the foghorn the location was in the present and on earth not located in the past. Lastly the story all in a summer day was different because the characters were not dealing with a beast they were each just dealing with time. This proves that each of the stories had many differences.
In the story, Zaroff and Rainsford are both enjoy hunting, and are both excellent and skillful hunters
When Rainsford falls off of the boat, he has to try his best to stay afloat until he can find something to latch on to. He swims vigorously until he reaches Ship-Trap Island. "Jagged crags appeared to jut up into the opaqueness... dense jungle came down to the very edge of the cliffs." It is midday and he is just searching for a place to rest when he runs into Ivan, the astonishingly large guard of the island. Zaroff, the owner of the island, joins in on their conversation about hunting. The conversation is interesting to say the least. Zaroff says, "You'll find this game worth playing…your brain against mine. Your woodcraft against mine. Your strength and stamina against mine. Outdoor chess! And the stake is not without value, eh?" Zaroff is trying to point out that he finds interest in hunting humans, and he wants to know if Rainsford will rise to the challenge. Rainsford is left with a choice to make; will he fight Zaroff, or will he decline and get killed by Ivan. The choice in this situation is pretty self- evident.
Facing hardships, problems, or obstacles shouldn’t discourage one from completing their task or job. Many of authors usually put their characters through tough complications to show the reader that no matter what happens; anyone could pull through. In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connel, the main character Mr. Rainsford gets stranded on an eerie island with a bad reputation. He meets General Zaroff and gets thrown into a huge hunting game, where his life is on the line. In the end, he wins the game and will continue to hunt animals, but not people, as the general once did. He will continue to hunt because one, hunting means everything to him. Two, he will not continue the general’s crazy ways, and resort back to the legal and non-dangerous to other humans sport. Third, he feels powerful when he becomes the hunter and not the hunted. Giving up hunting would be like giving up his life, so just because of a minor block he had to overcome, he will not give up hunting.