Mos Nunez Case Study

185 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: consequences of drunk driving

MOS state that MOS Nunez and Sgt. Schwartz were in an unmarked vehicle when they observed P approach a van. P saw MOS and began to walk past the unmarked vehicle. MOS observed something fall from P’s hand to the sidewalk. MOS Nunez exited the car to speak to P and Sgt. Schwartz approached the van. MOS Nunez bought P back to the where the van was and the driver of the van was outside. As MOS Nunez was speaking P and the driver, Sgt. Schwartz looked around the area where MOS had observed something fall from P. Then, P and the driver told each other in Spanish to run in opposite direction. MOS Nunez ran after P and Sgt. Schwartz ran after the driver. MOS Nunez cornered P in an alleyway. In order to take P down, MOS Nunez struck P with right hand

Show More
Related

  • Northwestern Mutual Case Study

    1592 Words  | 4 Pages

    Northwestern spends too much on recruiting and education to see a majority of its employee leave before they are able to have a full career as a financial advisor. By paying their employees northwestern is able increase employee productivity, increase the employee’s lifespan at the company, which will increase the number of clients northwestern will have as well.

    Read More

  • State V Marshall Case Study

    1625 Words  | 4 Pages

    Facts: Rex Marshall testified that the deceased came into his store intoxicated, and started whispering things to his wife. The defendant stated that he ordered the deceased out of the store immediately, however the deceased refused to leave and started acting in an aggressive manner; by slamming his hate down on the counter. He then reached for the hammer, the defendant states he had reason to believe the deceased was going to hit him with the hammer attempting to kill him. Once the deceased reached for the hammer the defendant shot him almost immediately.

    Read More

  • David Hicks Speech

    951 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the evening of Ms. Heggar¡¦s death she was alone in her house. Eddie Ray Branch, her grandson, testified that he visited his grandmother on the day that she was killed. He was there till at least 6:30 p.m. Lester Busby, her grandnephew, and David Hicks arrived while her grandson was still there and they saw him leave. They then went in to visit with Ms. Heggar. While they were there, Lester repaid Ms. Heggar 80 dollars, which he owed her. They left around 7:15 p.m. and went next door to a neighboring friend¡¦s house. David Hick¡¦s went home alone from there to get something but returned within ten minutes of leaving. Because he was only gone for 5-10 minutes, prosecution theorized TWO attacks on Ms. Heggar because he could not have killed his grandmother during this 5-10 minute period alone. At 7:30 p.m., 15 minutes after the two had left, an insurance salesman called to see Ms. Heggar. He knocked for about 2 or 3 minutes and got no reply. Her door was open but the screen door was closed. Her TV was on. He claimed to have left after about 5 minutes and then he returned the next morning. The circumstances were exactly the same. With concern, he went to the neighbor¡¦s house and called the police. His reasoning for being there was because the grandmother¡¦s family had taken out burial insurance three days before she had died.

    Read More

  • Genovevo Salinas Case Study

    520 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the morning of December 18, 1992, two brothers were shot and killed in their home in Houston Texas. Police recovered six shotgun shell casings at the home and their investigation led them to defendant Genovevo Salinas who agreed to hand over his weapon for ballistics testing and to go to the police station for questioning. The interview lasted for about one hour, and both parties agree it was noncustodial therefore he was not read his Miranda warning. Salinas answered most of the officer’s questions during the interview, but fell silent and his body tensed up when asked if the shotgun would match the shells recovered at the murder scene. After a few minutes of silence, the officer continued to ask more questions, which he did answer. Salinas did not testify at his own trial and, even with his objection, the prosecution used his silence in response to the officer’s question as evidence that he was guilty.

    Read More

  • Is Mary Maloney A Sympathetic Character

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    You will be placed on either defense or prosecution. Respond according to your placement. (I am prosecution)

    Read More

  • Case Study: Situation Assessment

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    - If all of the options were explored, and patient is given antibiotics and is treated without any pain or suffering than the treatment identifies with the ethnical principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, and veracity. In turn, Mrs. Dawson will be happy with the outcome of the procedure.

    Read More

  • Case Study: Homicide Case

    278 Words  | 1 Pages

    My homicide case began when the Shreveport Police Department (SPD) received a call from a male caller via 911 reporting he found a body of a black male found in a park near a cul-de-sac in a residential area. I was dispatched and responded to the scene. Upon arrival, I began steps documenting the crime scene. I initiated a rough sketch of the scene and initiated my field notes. A cordon was initiated as I began identifying possible evidence and identifying witnesses and suspects. I canvassed the area and found four 9mm shell casings near the body.

    Read More

  • Rob Burr Case

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    The State, Fann, the defendant, pointed a starter pistol at the victim during a robbery. Like the cane used by Burr during the stealing of the coin, the starter pistol used by Fann could not harmfully fire a projectile towards the victim, but looked strikingly similar to a real gun. Moreover, Fann pointed the gun at the victim, but did so in a way that did not indicate an intent to strike the victim with the object. This point also aligns with how Burr used the cane to motion for Mr. Shopkeeper to get in the closet, instead to indicate some sort of intent to strike Mr. Shopkeeper and inflict injury. The trial court initially convicted Fann of armed robbery, but on appeal, the court concluded that the starter’s pistol used by Fann was not used as an offensive weapon, thus vacating his armed robbery conviction.

    Read More

  • Film Analysis: An Overview Of Investigative Interviewing

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the interviewee said “I went diagonally across the street”, the officer said “you went straight across the street”, and the interviewee agreed and changed her statement. Then the officer directly plants the idea in the victim’s memories that the two young people we men, directly after the victim said she did not know their gender. The “description of the suspect” continued on with the officer planting false information in the statement. The officer asked the closed-ended question of “was it a bright day, the sun was shining?” instead of the open-ended question of “how was the weather”. The officer did use proper open-ended questions regarding the clothing of the suspect. During the reenactment of the crime scene, the officer once again feeds his own narrative by planting the idea that the interviewee hit her elbow on the side of the car when, she truly did not know. The officer was cognoscenti of his proxemics and the audience can see that when the interviewee became emotional, the officer came closer to her and leaned

    Read More

  • The Bodies Are Talking: Will Society Listen?

    3892 Words  | 8 Pages

    That night, many witnesses reported having seen a man changing the tire of his van and waving any possible help away angrily while others reported seeing a woman wandering around the side of the dangerous highway. More witnesses reported that Kenneth and his wife were having many violent disputes at their home that usually resulted in Kenneth pursuing an angry Yvonne around the block. The most compelling evidence against Mathison, however, is purely scientific. Detective Paul Ferreira first noticed that the extensive blood stains inside the Mathison van. After hearing Mathison’s original account, he summoned the assistance of famed forensic expert Dr. Henry Lee to analyze what he thought was inconsistent evidence. Blood stains on the paneling and the spare tire in the cargo area reveal low-velocity blood stains meaning that the blood probably dripped from Yvonne’s head onto the floor. The stains found on the roof and steering wheel were contact transfer patterns probably caused by Mathison’s bloody hands. Blood stains on the driver’s side of the van were contact-dripping patterns which indicate that Mathison touched the inside of the van multiple times before and after moving his wife’s body. The final groups of blood stains on the instrument panel of the van were medium-velocity stains which show investigators that Mathison probably struck his wife at least once in the front seat causing the blood to fly from her open head wound. The enormous amounts of blood inside the van lead prosecutor Kurt Spohn to investigate the Mathison case as a murder instead of a misdemeanor traffic violation.

    Read More

  • Northwestern Mutual Case Study

    1604 Words  | 4 Pages

    The objective of paying our employees is to increase employee satisfaction and loyalty. Northwestern sends too much on recruiting and education to see a majority of its employee leave before they are able to have a full career as a financial advisor. By paying their employees northwestern is able increase employee productivity, increase the employee’s lifespan at the company, which will increase the number of clients northwestern will have as well.

    Read More

  • Sacco And Vanzetti Analysis

    1640 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first evidence is the judge and jury ignored the physical evidence that both men weren’t in area when the crime happen, and their guns were not the same caliber there were a .38 while the gun reported was a .32. The police also had fingerprints from the buick the was used in the South Braintree crime. But the fingerprints didn’t match and the police instead questioned them on their religion, political beliefs and associates instead of the crime. The prosecutors used witness but the witness accounts made no sense. Meaning it didn’t match the descriptions of the men and the their stories weren’t the same and had loops hole. One witness said she saw the shooting from 60 feet away and said one of the men which she said was Sacco had big hands but he had small hands. Another said they saw Sacco kill Berardelli (one of the men who was killed in South Braintree), but the defense question and she said she hidden under workbench when the shots fired and didn’t see the men. The third witness said she talked to a man under a car fixing it as Sacco but her companion said she didn’t talk or saw him. Instead it was a pale sick young man. The day of the crime Sacco was getting a passport. A official confirmed Sacco was their getting a passport but the picture he had was too big. Other witnesses said they saw Vanzetti selling fish in Boston and some even bought some. The last piece of evidence is that the prosecutors tried to convicted them using consciousness of guilt. It is when you are guilty of a crime because you are lying about your actions because you are guilty. They lied and said they didn’t know Mike Boda. They did this because they wanted a car to transport their anarchist pamphlets to a safe place. They wanted to do this because the police could arrest anyone with these pamphlets and the people would be

    Read More

  • What Is The Miranda Warning?

    1063 Words  | 3 Pages

    The case was against a 31 year old illegal immigrant, Antonio Martinez-Nunez. Martinez-Nunez was the main suspect in a murder case involving Armando Castaneda. Castaneda was found dead in a parked car in Reynoldsburg, Ohio in August 2009. The cause of death was ruled as asphyxiation. In February of 2010, Martinez-Nunez, was arrested by border patrol, while trying to illegally re-enter the country via Texas. Upon his arrest, border patrol was advised that he was a suspect in the above murder case. Before being sent back to Ohio, Martinez-Nunez was questioned via phone by Reynoldsburg police. The questioning was done with the help of a Spanish interpreter. Martinez-Nunez’s statement led to a nine count

    Read More

  • Musimundo Case Study

    2356 Words  | 5 Pages

    DESCRIBE THE STRATEGIC CONTEXT IN WHICH QUINTANA SHOULD JUDGE MUSIMUNDO’S PERFORMANCE. WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ENVIRONMENT THAT MUSIMUNDO COMPETES IN? WHAT ARE PEGASUS’ STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES FOR MUSIMUNDO? HOW DO THESE FACTORS AFFECT THE BUDGETING PROCESS?

    Read More

  • Jose's Case Study

    1571 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this paper I will address Jose’s case. Jose is a young Hispanic male who has recently been diagnosed HIV positive. The implications that his HIV diagnosis has had in his life and how attending an HIV support group has helped him to deal with his current situation. HIV is not only a health problem; it also has implications of social and psychological nature for people who are diagnosed with HIV. A social work assessment can help provide comprehensive treatment to the patient, where his/her medical and psychosocial needs are met. To analyze Jose’s case I will use Systems Perspective, Psychodynamic Perspective, Rational Choice Perspective, and their applications to Jose’s case assessment.

    Read More

More about Mos Nunez Case Study

Open Document