Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic development in Russia under Stalin and his repressive reign
Economic development in Russia under Stalin and his repressive reign
The impact of Joseph Stalin on Russia's economic development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Compare the 2 different types of economies. (Mixed market economy of Canada & Mixed command economy of Soviet Union) Both Canada and Soviet Union were economically strong countries, while they have their different individual methods to develop their economies. Canada's economy is a mixed(modified) market economy which refers to a market largely but not solely determined by the Canadian consumers. Soviet Union's economy is a mixed command economy which refers to a market primarily determined by the government. This essay will explore the economies of Canada and Soviet Union from three different perspectives. Who determine what kind of products should be produced? In Canada, governments only provide the framework of laws and regulations within …show more content…
In Canada, the private companies choose how to produce the products. They try to produce products in the cheapest way so that they could earn the most money. The amount of the products from the companies is depend on the demands of the people. If the people need more, they will make more. It is the approach for businessmen to make more money and to not make too much products which the market cannot consume. Even if the estimate of the companies are wrong, only certain companies will be hurt by it. In Soviet Union, the five-year plans created by the government decide how much the amount of products will be made. The government set a certain product goal for each industry, and they do it without considering the demands of the markets. The government has too many things to organize, but it is not able to handle everything correctly. The industries want a higher efficiency, however, they trade it with bad quality of the products. Moreover, the estimate of the people's demands made by the government could be wrong. This leads to the problem of overproduction or shortages of certain items in the whole country. Who are the products for? In Canada, the private companies decide who they sell the products to. Some make expensive items which only a certain amount of people can afford it. Some make cheap items which everyone can afford. In Soviet Union, the workers and their families receive many goods and services from the state by working in the industries. Their basic wants and needs are satisfied. They receive the products which government they to
Businesses would differ extremely due to the fact that communism and capitalism are very different forms of government. These five essential parts (Product creation, Marketing, Sales, Finance, and Delivery of your Product) are the key factors in business and these two markets cause these factors to differentiate between the two types of markets. These two environments caused businesses to re evaluate their ways of marketing and getting consumers to get the products. Capitalism is the most fluent system of marketing, but communism has some valid ways of marketing as well.
In this essay I will be discussing the features of Scotland’s mixed market economy, describing four aspects of the Scottish economy; Tourism, unemployment, growth and the NHS.
As part of War Communism meant that industries were nationalised meaning that all industry was n...
Before the war, Canada’s most important sector in its economy was agriculture. However, this was changing drastically after and during the war as industry began to take over as being more important. Canadian production of war material, food supplies, and raw materials had been crucial during the war. After the war, it was only natural that big investments were being made in mining, production, transportation, and services industries. Canadian cities were becoming very important contributors to the economy. This was also bringing in waves of post-war immigration, the backbone of Canada’s multicultural society we know today.
The post-war time was a period where major changes were occurring. After being involved in two international conflicts, Canada was ready to reestablish their economy. During this time, Canada had started working on ways to become stronger and reputable. It is evident that Canada had matured through the post-war era. Canada’s economic progress left a positive impact on the growth of the country as consumerism became popular, and economic ties with America became stronger. Moreover, the removal of racial and ethical barriers contributed to Canadian social affairs such as the huge wave of immigration and the baby boom. The Canadian government also had become more aware and involved in issues impacting Canadian citizens. Canada as a whole started identifying itself as an independent nation and participating in events that brought a positive reputation amongst them. These economical, social, and legal changes helped Canada mature into the country it is today.
Once Gorbachev released and implemented his reforms, the economy of the Soviet Union was destroyed (Danks 5). For example, the alcohol ban, which was a law created to prevent the sales and production of liquors, caused profits to drop for many companies, causing unemployment and inflation (Danks 5). The ban had been created so the workforce would be more efficient and could help the economy grow, but it had the opposite effect by decreasing the number of jobs available and c...
Before the Stalin, the Soviet Union was backward, medieval type country full of unmade roads and people who lived without electricity in wooden homes. The Five Year Plans changed thi...
The cold war had great impacts on the bound and tension between Canada and the United States. The Cold War had divided the whole world in to two sides between the Communism side and the United States. Due to the geographic location of Canada sitting beside US, and Canada had already traded some of its sovereignty in a series of political and military pacts with the U.S, therefore Canada took the United States’ side. Canada took the US’s side as a reaction to the international tensions during the post-w...
However , a serious economic crisis appears Soviet bloc when the collapse once in 1989 . Drop in imports essential to agricultural production is why the first , but domestic food production was reduced to 40% . Food distribution is decreased , intake of protein was also red...
Russia, a vast country with a wealth of natural resources, a well, educated population, and diverse industrial base, continues to experience, formidable difficulties in moving from its old centrally planned economy to a modern market economy. President Yeltsin's government has made substantial strides in converting to a market economy since launching its economic reform program in January 1992 by freeing nearly all prices, slashing defense spending, eliminating the old centralized distribution system, completing an ambitious voucher privatization program, establishing private financial institutions, and decentralizing trade. Russia, however, has made little progress in a number of key areas that are needed to provide a solid foundation for the transition to a market economy.
Canada and the United States are the largest trade partners in the world. It is the result of the geographical position of two countries and the free trade between two countries. It should be a great thing for the economies of both countries, but since the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed, American businesses almost took over the Canadian economy. When the American companies started to make more business in Canada, it brought more jobs and money to the country in the short-term. But as a long-term effect Canadians became even more depended on the U.S. as the American companies started dominating Canadian companies in Canada. Also, today Canadian manufacturers have little protection from the government when ch...
The major difference between a command economy and a market economy is who makes the decisions. In a command economy, the government decides what to produce, who to produce for, and how to produce. In a market economy, the people get to decide what to produce, who to produce for, and how to produce. The major difference lies with the control and who is in charge.
The Soviet Union, which was once a world superpower in the 19th century saw itself in chaos going into the 20th century. These chaoses were marked by the new ideas brought in by the new leaders who had emerged eventually into power. Almost every aspect of the Soviet Union was crumbling at this period both politically and socially, as well as the economy. There were underlying reasons for the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and eventually Eastern Europe. The economy is the most significant aspect of every government. The soviet economy was highly centralized with a “command economy” (p.1. fsmitha.com), which had been broken down due to its complexity and centrally controlled with corruption involved in it. A strong government needs a strong economy to maintain its power and influence, but in this case the economic planning of the Soviet Union was just not working, which had an influence in other communist nations in Eastern Europe as they declined to collapse.
Starting 1928, the Stalinist economic policy was characterized by a rupture with Lenin’s quasi-capitalist New Economic Policy. The need to protect the Union from eventual capitalist and imperialist wars necessitated the creation of a self-sufficient industry and agriculture freed from the constraints of the market. The industrial policy resembled that of a war economy focused on heavy industries such as steel, weapons and the industrial centers were relocated in remote areas such as the Urals and Siberia, rich in natural resources. In 1937, the part of small industries had fallen from a third in 1913 to 6 percent (Davies 1989, 1029). This process revealed to be extremely successful on a macroscop...
China and Russia's approach to change are vastly different, almost like night and day. China's political and economic policy has always been to do things gradually. Whereas Russia believed in going through the necessary changes quickly, so that the hardship would in turn pass just as quickly. In the implementation of their policies, we have seen that China's approach has led to a 29% of growth in their industrial field. But in comparison, Russia only yielded 15% with their approach. But one must keep in mind that China has more industrial sectors than does Russia, so their job in improving industry is notably easier than Russia's feat in developing an industry.