Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
explain the influence of culture on health
explain the influence of culture on health
explain the influence of culture on health
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: explain the influence of culture on health
What are we to do? I am talking to the men out there that are or will be looking for a wife in China, India or European in this generation and I am talking to men around the world that are not yet born and will be coming in the next generation. According to Mara Hvistendahl the author of “Missing: 163 Million Women” the children of the future, especially many males, that will be looking for brides will find that they will be unable to find one. Kay Dickersin the author of “Female editorship is an important indicator of gender imbalance adds on by stating that men impacted by gender imbalance can and will cause changes to society and these changes will likely be something bad. Kwame Anthony Appiah the author of “Making conversation” proposes …show more content…
Overall the gender imbalance that has developed as a result of parents aborting children they don’t want and choosing the children they want is the cause of this gender imbalance. People are people and they will act based on what they believe is correct even if many people would find the action that they committed irrational. According to Appiah in order to understand people better we must live in their culture and get used to their environment, most importantly we must communicate our ideas and feelings. In truth I somewhat agree with what Appiah is stating, the truth is that in order for there to be change or in order for a solution to be brought about the problem must first be identified. Dickersin provides great insight into what the future may be like as a result of continued gender imbalance. The truth is as of now despite a surplus of men there is not enough as compared to the world as a whole to be able to see the real effects of gender imbalance. Right now there are many cultures and environments out there that favor having a male child and because of this parents that have a restriction on the amount of children they are allowed to have will likely opt to choose a male child over a female
Gender roles are a staple construct of human civilization, designating the behaviors and lifestyles that society expects out of its participants, with gender as the defining characteristic. Historically, females have been at the forefront of the conversation, with feminism regarded as the principal solution to the well-established issue of gender inequality. However, this is foolish. To truly mend the gender inequalities forged by thousands of years of human interaction, both genders have to be acknowledged. Both males and females are equally constrained by gender roles, however the effects of this constraint are in differing fields. There are studies showing that females are at a disadvantage economically, in the workplace, while other studies
Dena Davis in the 5th chapter of “Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices, and Children’s Futures” explores the global attitudes, policies, and morality towards determination of sex. She begins with presenting empirical evidence of some preferences held in countries such as India or China where there is a clear desire for male children. This inclination is so deeply held that mothers can be socially and physically harmed when, by pure biological chance, they fail to produce a male child. Davis and others allow sex selection in these cases, purely in the interest of harm reduction of mothers and their daughters born into such a situation. This example is contrasted with so-called “western” societies, where the preference
gender. Explain this claim and Appiah’s argument for it. Do you think he is right? Why or why
Seen as sexist and oppressive societies – girls have no value if they are not married, women should obey orders from men
...ce and male to female ratio. G.I Serour states: “It is argued that gender selection for nonmedical reasons will reinforce this male preference pattern, lead to a serious distortion of the sex ratio, identify gender as a reason to value one person over another, or contribute to society's gender stereotyping.” (Transcultural Issues In Gender Selection). In conclusion many of the signs point to the idea and practice of gender selection being unethical and an immoral concept. Selecting the gender of your child for nonmedical reasons before it naturally happens is unethical and also unsafe. Introducing destructive processes and tools into the body is bad enough on its own but using them while a baby is developing is absolutely absurd. Babies should have the opportunity to naturally develop into what they were meant to be, not what their parents would prefer them to be.
Gender equality has been a prominent issue for an exceptionally long period of time. Feminists have been attempting to fight for male and female equality for decades by trying to prove that females are just as capable as males are. Throughout history, women were treated unequally while being compared to men. Today, in the contemporary world, some females are still treated unfairly in many diverse ways. Some people argue that women and men are indeed equal; however, women are certainly unequal in the eyes of most men. The idea that many women are treated unfairly can be seen through marriages. “The Yellow Wallpaper,” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, “Trifles,” by Susan Glaspell, an article by Kyle J. Bourassa, David A. Sbarra, and Mark A. Whisman,
This type of abortion is directly related to the social standards, usually sex selection does not pursue therapeutic purposes but economic. Couples prefer to have sons and some are willing to undergo treatments of assisted fertilization to ensure a child, not for health reasons but for economic, political or cultural reasons.
The practice of female infanticide shows how desirable having a male child is that parents would take the lives of a female baby. The dowry system in India is the main cause of female infanticide in India. Gender inequalities in the rural part of northern India exhibit female infanticide occurs here the most despite laws to abolish these acts. Men hold a higher value in this society because a system they adapted many years ago. Men are seen as an asset or of value because at one point his future wife and her family will “pay” for him. Daughters are opposite and viewed as a burden to the family because she will have to marry one day and that will cost her parents. So women are not viewed equally here even as infants, they don’t even stand a chance. Officials have tried to make laws to assist in reducing female infanticide but people have continued to follow traditions of the dowry systems putting the population at risk as well
to the conclusion at one point that the whole thing was hopeless because it is a biological fact women have babies and that is always a career breaker. I end this paper rather disappointed that now, as it was centuries ago,are allowing their lives to be run by male views and stereotypes. The world is moving forward but unless women stop allowing
When expecting parents want to identify the sex of their child, occasionally the doctor will inform them to paint the nursery blue or pink rather than tell them the actual sex. More often than not they know which to expect, a boy or a girl, dependent on the color, and how to stock the nursery, with trucks or dolls, why is it that children are separated according to gender, and so early in life too? Sex is a reflection of biological organs, while gender is a state of mind. The concept of gender is so deeply rooted in society it becomes difficult to pinpoint its effects as learned rather than natural occurrences (Devor 383). It seems just natural for women to be the care givers and men the providers. Behaviors people become comfortable with are exhibited openly towards their children. Susan D. Witt states:
Determining whether to divulge the gender of a child should be a personal choice. Society should not dictate whether one chooses to disclose the sex of their child. At conception, the gender is determined by chromosome characteristics and it will be the male (male semen) that dictates whether the baby will be a boy or girl. Nowhere in any literature that has been read or published that it states that “society” is the determining factor whether a girl or boy will be conceived. Society suggests that knowing the gender is routine, but what may be considered routine for some is not necessarily customary for all. If one chooses to stray away from what is considered to be “normal” it poses or present an issue. Individuals are instantaneously met with opposition or back lash due to nondisclosure of the sex of their child whether it is unborn or born. A typical argument would be as to what color clothing to bring for the unborn or born child, should one bring pink or blu...
The divorce rate in most western countries is alarming. In eastern countries they are definitely on the rise. The two sexes are taught so well to be different from each other that when it is time for them to live together they can't. The only solution maybe to go back and unlearn exactly what comprises femininity and masculinity. So that the future children grow up to fill our expectations of what is human, rather than what feminine or masculine.
...with the number of children being produced at the same time and based on the amount of time placed in between each mating period. Finally there is the separation of the children from their parents at birth and their placement with nurses for the extent of their rearing. This creates a problem because it goes against the maternal nature of most women and does not explain what would happen if a mother refused to give up her child.
Equality is a concept mankind never is able to grasp correctly. Of course humans will always search for different solutions to create fairness, but factors such as human greed, ignorance of mass populations, and even biological aspects stagnates the process of equality. The oldest and most relevant discussion on equality lies with the difference of sex; man versus woman. Initially, men, because of their physical superiority, were given the prospects many women never even dreamt to have. Conversely, as time has progressed, women have fought this unfair treatment with demands of suffrage and similar rights to those of their male equivalents. Greatly enough, this generation has done an exceptional job in the challenge of overcoming sexism and inequality. However, will this search for equality ever end? When can we say we have created an equal race of men and women? The fact of the matter is that it is truly impossible to have equality between the sexes because of predisposed circumstances that are not easily controllable in the slightest bit.
Female foeticide has become a disgraceful and shocking reality of this nation. For centuries, families across many parts of India have look upon the male child as the superlative of the two sexes. A male child is seen as a blessing in the Indian society and since years people have made lavish offerings and numerous prayers in hopes for getting a son. These beliefs continue to remain even though times have changed and now much of the inequality is reducing. The Indian society recognizes a insightful faith in every individual’s right to life and dignity but this rights are dishonored when it comes to women and children in this society. A difference in a society’s ideal values and its reality is defined as a social