Miranda Vs Arizona Supreme Court Case Summary

The 1966 Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona marked a watershed moment in American legal history, centering on the rights of the accused and the protection of individual liberties. The cause of this case was the story of Ernesto Miranda, a twenty-four-year-old Hispanic man who was accused of kidnapping and raping an eighteen-year-old in Phoenix, Arizona on March 3, 1963. Following his arrest on March 13, 1963, Miranda found himself enduring interrogation for two hours without being made aware of his rights. This ignited a debate throughout the Arizona Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. The creation that emerged out of this case altered the landscape of the criminal justice system; the creation of Miranda Rights. Miranda

In Brown v. Mississippi (1936), three black farmers named Ed Brown, Henry Shields, and Arthur Ellington were arrested for the murder of a white planter in Mississippi. The three men confessed to the murder after being beaten and whipped repeatedly. The only evidence the court had that linked the men to the crime was their confession. They were sentenced to death. The United States Supreme Court overturned the convictions, emphasizing the injustice of the trial proceedings and condemning the abusive methods used to obtain confessions from the defendants. The overall decision that was made explained that “on due process grounds the use of a coerced confession in a state criminal proceeding held unconstitutional,” ultimately outlawing the use of coerced confessions. This case is key in Miranda v. Arizona because Miranda was coerced into confessing and this violated due process. In the case of Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), Daniel Escobedo was accused of shooting his brother-in-law and was arrested. During his interrogation, he requested to see his lawyer multiple times but was denied. The United States Supreme Court decided Escobedo’s confession was obtained in violation of

In summary, the case of Miranda v. Arizona reshaped the landscape of the justice system by safeguarding individual liberties during police interrogations with the implementation of Miranda Rights. These rights have also addressed the inherent imbalance of power between law enforcement and suspects, ensuring fairness and reliability in criminal proceedings. The Miranda Rights underscore the principles of justice, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their circumstances, are afforded equal protection under the