Miranda V Arizona Essay

1116 Words5 Pages
Everyone agrees that police should not use unconstitutional methods to coerce a suspect into giving out a confession, yet police have used unauthorized force throughout American history. Fortunately, the Supreme Court created a legal safeguard against police abuses. The safeguards were created in the 1960s after taking a case titled Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda v. Arizona is unarguably one of the most important actions the Supreme Court has taken to prevent police abuses. Many jurisdictions have interpreted Miranda v. Arizona differently and because of the lack of uniformity, Miranda v. Arizona remains a controversial ruling today. This paper will examine the facts of the case, its significant to the legal system.
…show more content…
In Kyle Scherr’s You Have the Right to Understand: The Deleterious Effect of Stress on Suspects ' Ability to Comprehend Miranda article, he states that researchers have study how certain impartments can impair someone’s understanding of the Miranda rights (Scherr, 2012). For example, he lists how stress, intelligence, and even the method of communication can impair a suspect’s understanding of his Miranda rights, especially stress. He states that “stress expends valuable cognitive resources that would otherwise be used for efficient cognitive functioning, and by so doing, compromises the efficiency of individuals ' working memory system” (Scherr par. 6). Essentially, stress messes with the processing of how memory is stored, and thus, hypothetical, causes “inaccuracy in eyewitness identifications” and maims the suspect’s ability to recall past witnessed events with accuracy (Scherr par. 8). People being accused of crimes can feel pressured, awkward, and uncomfortable, regardless of whatever they have committed the crime or…show more content…
In his research, Kyle finds that people with substance abuse and unacute mental health have a harder time understanding their Miranda rights (Scherr par. 6). Furthermore, the participants had a clearer understanding of their rights during interrogation when oral warnings were written at an sixth grade level more than they were written at an eighth grade. (Scherr par. 3). The human brain is supposed to function to work as little as possible when processing its main mechanisms. The human brain performs more efficiently when there is less
Open Document