More handpicked essays just for you.
Cotan beoordeling MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY 1993
Cotan beoordeling MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY 1993
Cotan beoordeling MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY 1993
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. History: The instrument is called Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). It was developed by Hathaway and McKinley, who were working at the University of Minnesota in the late 1930s. It was first intended for use with an adult population, nevertheless, it was then extended to include adolescents, mostly for youths in the middle years, that are ages 15 and 16. The reading level require is at least a sixth-grade, so it was absolutely not appropriate for average children below the age of about 13 or for retarded persons. The MMPI can be administered to bright children of 11 or 12 years, great caution has to be exercised in the interpretation of the results. The MMPI was completely …show more content…
1) It is used in occupational health. This is where doubt as to what is really wrong with the patient exists. 2) It is used in ‘high-risk’ professions such as the airline industry where airline pilots, law enforcement (police) or workers in the nuclear power industry to assess psychological stability in work. However MMPI-2 has one major disadvantage for the occupational health physician which is that the MMPI-2 is a rigorously licensed test and can only be purchased, administered and interpreted by a very experienced clinical psychologist or psychiatrist. Because of this, it is regarded as a complex diagnostic investigation for relatively infrequent use. Administering time: It takes most people between 60 minutes and 90 minutes to complete the MMPI-2. Items: The MMPI-2 has 567 item, which are true/false self-report measure of a person's psychological state. There are nine validity scales or ‘lie’ scales, assessing for lying, defensiveness, faking decent and faking evil and among others. These scales make it very difficult to fake the MMPI-2 results. MMPI 2 can be used to determine the following clinical …show more content…
Validity The MMPI used a normative sample of 2600 adults drawn from different regions of the country. As of date there are more than 10 000 published papers using the MMPI-2, and every year hundreds of papers are added to it. A symptom validity scale (FBS) has been added to the list in recent years to help eliminate symptom exaggeration and has been reported as having very low false-positive rates.
According to Barrick and Mount (2005), one of the benefits of utilizing personality tests in the selection process is that it is helpful in predicting work behaviors. The benefit of measuring the Big Five Personality traits is that it aids in measuring specific job performance measures. These measures include motivation, interpersonal interaction, and the ability to influence others (as cited in Barrick, & Mount, 2005). Additionally, personality tests have the ability to predict various factors related to career success (Barrick, & Mount, 2005).
According to Camara, Nathan and Puente (2000), the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, commonly refered to as MMPI, is the most used researched and standardized psychometric for test for psychopathology and personality among adults. The MMPI-A is the version that was specifically designed to take on a different approach to personality test that targets adolescents aged between 14 and 18 years (Asendorpf, 2003). Using the approach among adolescents, psychologists can help in differential diagnosis, answer legal questions, formulate treatment plans and participate in therapeutic evaluation (Gass & Odland, 2014). From the perspective of a school psychologist, this
Self-report has always been one the easiest ways to gain insight of a person’s personality. These test can range from quizzes filled out online that tell you which pop star is your personality twin to standardized tests requiring a certified test user. Some of the most popular and highly researched tests have been the MMPI and its successors. The MMPI, created by Stark R. Hathaway and John Charneley McKinley, was the first step towards the MMPI-2-RF. The MMPI was firstly created to test individuals who were 14 years old and older. Throughout the years, the MMPI has through a lot of changes, evolving into three tests used today: MMPI-2, MMPI-A, and MMPI-2-RF (Cohen & Swerdlik, 2013).
The Big Five is the most widely accepted and used model of personality. The model consists of broad dimensions of personality traits. These dimensions are: Openness to Experience/Intellect, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism.
The Big Five Personality Test provided an interesting account of my personality. Although the majority of the results were accurate, I was surprised by two of the outcomes. According to this test, I am a closed-minded, unmethodical, social butterfly that is well-mannered towards others and composed under pressure (John, 2009). First, the results were completely accurate as I am extremely extroverted. I never meet a stranger, and I carry on conversations with anyone. From the custodian, to the cashier, to a random person on the street, it gives me a great sense of fulfillment to engage in dialogue with others from all walks of life. Second, I agree that I am polite and supportive, especially with family and friends. Overall, I try to always
This assessment was designed to interpret the mind of an adolescent utilizing and integrating his theory into the assessment. Based on the different general outlines of personality, the levels of personality, and the domains of personality, the assessment was designed to predict of help develop a hypothesis of what is troubling an adolescent mentally. There are four different assessments within the MACI broken by age and by gender. There is one assessment for males 13-15, one for females 13-15, one for males 16-19, and one for females 16-19. “The MACI has 31 scales divided into three clinical domains (clinical sydromes, expressed concerns, and personality styles) and a fourth domain consisting of three modifying indices (desirability, disclosure, and debasement) plus a basic validity check.” (Pinto & Grilo, p. 1508, 2004) The MACI was intended to work with the DSM-IV diagnoses for predicting likelihood of a clinical symptom in an adolescent. In the Mental Measurements Yearbook, Sandoval points out there are 31 scales in the MACI and the self- report system allows the personality and predisposition of the adolescent to be rated by the expert on themselves. It is intended to measure common adolescent issues, such as: mood disorders, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, alcohol and substance use, ADHD, etc. The participants in the assessment take a 160 question, true or false format assessment, which
...This theory is useful because it focuses on the learners or patients’ perceptions, desires, and decision making. It works well with all patients since nurses take patients’ needs and feelings into consideration when giving information.
The MACI consists of a 160-item inventory, provided in the English and Spanish language, with a combination of the 27 subscales. The intention of the inventory is to provide counselors and other healthcare or school professional with information to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning for personality disorders in adolescent (Millon & Davis, 1993). The inventory consists of true or false questions; given that this inventory is shorter compared to other personality assessment, it only takes about 20-30 minutes to complete. Millon’s MACI inventory provides convenient and cost-effective methods for scoring the inventory, which include Q-global web-based scoring, Q-Local software-based scoring, and mail-in scoring. Since the MACI is tailored toward adolescents ranging in ages from 13-19, participants must have a minimum of a sixth grade reading level in order to
Interpreting The MMPI-2-RF included a vast amount of information about the reliability data in the MMPI-2-RF. For example, the scores on the Somatic/Cognitive Scales, Internalizing Specific Problems Scales, Externalizing Specific Problems Scales, and Interpersonal Scales amongst others were reliable based on test-retest correlations and internal consistency estimates in clinical studies. The empirical data offered by the Technical Manual shows strong and distinctive correlational findings, and consistent measures of the constructs the scales target. These findings provide strong evidence supporting the construct validity and reliability of the 51 Scales found in the MMPI-2...
The purpose of a mental status exam is to evaluate the general functioning of an individual at any given point.
Utility of assessment. Why are these types of personality assessments useful? Did you find the results useful? Why or why not?
McCann, J. T. (1991). Convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI-II and MMPI personality disorder scales. Psychological Assessment: A Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 9-18. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.3.1.9
In the vast and detailed world of psychology, there are a variety of different tests you can participate in. For example, you can participate in aptitude, verbal or numerical reasoning, and psychometric tests. These tests assess on a variety of different situations such as: behaviors, abilities and intelligence. Personality tests, a common and favored test, measure things such as: behavioral style, opinions, motivators, personal values and career interests. Most often, people complain or disagree with the score of some areas on their personality test; however, there are no right or wrong answers. After completing this personality test and reviewing the results, I found that the overall scoring accurately described me in most areas. The Big Five Personality test scores in five different areas involving openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism.
It is a diagnostic and strategic tool for improving workplace performance because it is a thoughtful, evidence-based approach. It is the traditional and system-based model used by many performance improvement practitioners.
After taking the Big Five Personality Test I’ve concluded that it is a fairly accurate assessment of my personality. 1) On Openness to Experience/Intellect I ranked at the 53 percentile, with the description that I don’t typically seek out new experiences. I would agree with this assessment. While I am somewhat creative, I am no artist. It takes me more time to do something creative than something analytical, but I do still like to be creative on occasion.