Miller's Theory Of Moral Development In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

1368 Words3 Pages

The Crucible, a play written by Arthur Miller based off the Salem Witch Trials, takes place in Salem, Massachusetts, 1692. During this time period, women weren’t as significant as men. Men held the authority and worked while women were to work in the home as servants. Beginning with the protagonist, Abigail Williams goes to Tituba, a slave, to get revenge on John Proctor. Abigail and Proctor had an affair, committing adultery due to the fact that Proctor is married to Elizabeth Proctor, which is against the Puritan beliefs. Once after the affair, Proctor tells Abigail that they mustn’t continue any longer and that it was only a one-time event. Unsettling Abigail, she goes to Tituba with a motives for a spell to kill Goody Proctor in the forbidden …show more content…

During the play, Abigail begins on stage two, when she first comes into Act I asking for Tituba to do what she did in the forest. In this time, she is only thinking of herself and what she wants, which is for Goody Proctor to be out of the picture so she can be with John Proctor, as Betty said, “You did, you did! You drank a charm to kill John Proctor’s wife! You drank a charm to kill Goody Proctor!” Later in Act I, Abigail jumps back to stage two, and starts blaming others she claims were involved with witchcraft, as she says, “I saw Sarah Good with the Devil! I saw Goody Osburn with the Devil! I saw Bridget Bishop with the Devil!” Abigail stays in stage two throughout the play. Abigail’s motives were clearly seen for the audience and readers. Abigail started her decisions on jealousy and continued to ride through the drama on top, leading the girls and court, and causing unsettlement in the town. Abigail believes John Proctor loves her after their affair, and that getting rid of Elizabeth will give her the opportunity to become Proctor’s wife. Abigail clearly likes to be in control, which is why she takes over the girls and even gains control over their behavior throughout the play. Throughout the entire play, just about everything Abigail said has been logical fallacies. In Act I, she blames Tituba for the …show more content…

It refers to Moses, in the Bible, and how he parted the Red Sea for the Israelites to escape from Pharaoh and his armies. Thinking about empowerment taking place in The Crucible, there are a lot of real world events and applications based on this theme. Politicians wiggle their way to the top through power. Without power, politicians can’t proceed with their campaigns and governed activities. Politicians with empowerment can move forward and increase their strengths and position over their place as a candidate for an elected office. Politicians can be juxtaposed with Abigail, from The Crucible, because just as Abigail made her way to control the people of the town by putting everyone else beneath her, politicians start from their position and work their way up also by putting their political opponent beneath them to make themselves look

Open Document